On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>in</strong> which<br />
Xq ≡<br />
�<br />
v<br />
√ Y q Y<br />
2MKK<br />
† q ,<br />
¯Xq ≡<br />
2.4. Profiles of Fermions 75<br />
�<br />
v<br />
√ Y<br />
2MKK<br />
† q Y q . (2.133)<br />
The solutions to <strong>the</strong>se PDEs are hyperbolic functions. Integration constants are fixed<br />
by <strong>the</strong> fact that at <strong>the</strong> IR brane t = 1, <strong>the</strong> S-profiles have Dirichlet BCS, SQ,q n (1) = 0<br />
and at 1 − η, <strong>the</strong>y must be matched onto <strong>the</strong> solution of <strong>the</strong> bulk EOM at t = 1− . So<br />
that<br />
S Q � �<br />
Xq<br />
s<strong>in</strong>h (1 − t)<br />
η<br />
n (t) =<br />
s<strong>in</strong>h � � S<br />
Xq<br />
Q n (1 − ) , S q � �<br />
¯Xq<br />
s<strong>in</strong>h (1 − t)<br />
η<br />
n(t) =<br />
s<strong>in</strong>h � � S<br />
¯Xq<br />
q n(1 − ) .<br />
C Q � �<br />
Xq<br />
cosh (1 − t)<br />
η<br />
n (t) =<br />
cosh � � C<br />
Xq<br />
Q n (1 − ) , C q � �<br />
¯Xq<br />
cosh (1 − t)<br />
η<br />
n(t) =<br />
cosh � � C<br />
¯Xq<br />
q n(1 − ) ,<br />
(2.134)<br />
where <strong>the</strong> solutions for <strong>the</strong> C-profiles follow from (2.128). At <strong>the</strong> boundary between<br />
sliver and bulk, <strong>the</strong> bulk solutions are <strong>the</strong>refore related by<br />
S Q n (1 − ) a Q n =<br />
−S q n(1 − ) a q n =<br />
v � �<br />
√ Y ¯Xq<br />
−1 � �<br />
q tanh ¯Xq<br />
q<br />
Cn(1 2MKK<br />
− ) a q n , (2.135)<br />
v<br />
√ Y<br />
2MKK<br />
† � �−1 � � Q<br />
q Xq tanh Xq Cn (1 − ) a Q n , (2.136)<br />
which can be re-expressed by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effective Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
�<br />
�Y q ≡ f<br />
v<br />
�<br />
Y �q Y †<br />
�<br />
�q Y q , f(A) = A −1 tanh (A) . (2.137)<br />
√ 2MKK<br />
These correspond to <strong>the</strong> bare Yukawas plus corrections of <strong>the</strong> order O(v2 /M 2 KK ). <strong>On</strong>e<br />
can <strong>the</strong>refore write (2.137) as<br />
S Q n (1 − ) a Q n =<br />
−S q n(1 − ) a q n =<br />
v<br />
√<br />
2MKK<br />
v<br />
√<br />
2MKK<br />
�Y q C q n(1 − ) a q n , (2.138)<br />
�Y †<br />
q C Q n (1 − ) a Q n . (2.139)<br />
It is straightforward to derive <strong>the</strong> eigenvalue equation and expressions for <strong>the</strong> avectors<br />
from (2.138). S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> diagonal S- and C-profiles will have only nonzero<br />
entries (o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g SM quark would have no k<strong>in</strong>etic term), <strong>the</strong>y can<br />
be <strong>in</strong>verted and it follows<br />
S Q n (1 − ) a Q n = − v2<br />
2M 2 KK<br />
S q n(1 − ) a q n = − v2<br />
2M 2 KK<br />
�Y u C q n(1 − ) � S q n(1 − ) � −1 �Y †<br />
u C Q n (1 − ) a Q n ,<br />
�Y †<br />
u C Q n (1 − ) � S Q n (1 − ) � −1 �Y u C q n(1 − ) a q n . (2.140)