On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
With this def<strong>in</strong>ition,<br />
� |G|L<strong>in</strong>t ∋ e −3σ gs5<br />
�<br />
¯Q γ µ G a µ T a Q + ¯q c γ µ G a µ T a q c<br />
3.4. A Solution <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauge Sector 117<br />
− tan θ ¯ Q γ µ A a µ T a Q + cot θ ¯q c γ µ A a µ T a q c<br />
(3.57)<br />
�<br />
.<br />
It is obvious, that <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation Aµ will couple with opposite signs to 5D<br />
doublets and s<strong>in</strong>glets. These will <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> zero modes decompose <strong>in</strong>to lefthanded<br />
and right-handed 4D fields respectively, apart from small admixtures from<br />
<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r chirality. This is due to <strong>the</strong> fact, that <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r chirality enters with <strong>the</strong><br />
S-profiles <strong>in</strong> (2.123), which for <strong>the</strong> zero modes are suppressed by x0 ≈ v/MKK, see<br />
(2.149). The magnitude of <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs depends on <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>the</strong> propagator and<br />
<strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g angle θ. For θ = π/4, <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs become purely axial and one could<br />
speak of a 5D axigluon. In a slight abuse of language, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g, this notation<br />
will also be used for differ<strong>in</strong>g mix<strong>in</strong>g angles. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, however, <strong>in</strong> contributions<br />
to <strong>the</strong> diagrams responsible for C4, <strong>the</strong> dependence on <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g angle cancels, while<br />
<strong>the</strong> contributions to <strong>the</strong> purely left- and right-handed operators show <strong>the</strong> proportionality<br />
C1 ∼ tan 2 θ and � C1 ∼ cot 2 θ.<br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> contributions to C4 from <strong>the</strong> axigluon KK tower will lead to a<br />
cancellation of <strong>the</strong> contribution from <strong>the</strong> gluon KK tower will <strong>the</strong>refore only depend<br />
on <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g propagators which can <strong>in</strong>duce flavor changes at<br />
both vertices. These terms are fixed by <strong>the</strong> boundary conditions of Gµ and Aµ. As<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 2.3, <strong>the</strong> gluon must have Neumann BCs on both branes, with <strong>the</strong><br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g propagator (2.86). The only contribution to ∆F = 2 processes arise<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore from overlap <strong>in</strong>tegrals with <strong>the</strong> fermion profiles and <strong>the</strong> first term <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
second l<strong>in</strong>e of (2.86), which is ∼ t 2