05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With this def<strong>in</strong>ition,<br />

� |G|L<strong>in</strong>t ∋ e −3σ gs5<br />

�<br />

¯Q γ µ G a µ T a Q + ¯q c γ µ G a µ T a q c<br />

3.4. A Solution <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauge Sector 117<br />

− tan θ ¯ Q γ µ A a µ T a Q + cot θ ¯q c γ µ A a µ T a q c<br />

(3.57)<br />

�<br />

.<br />

It is obvious, that <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation Aµ will couple with opposite signs to 5D<br />

doublets and s<strong>in</strong>glets. These will <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> zero modes decompose <strong>in</strong>to lefthanded<br />

and right-handed 4D fields respectively, apart from small admixtures from<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r chirality. This is due to <strong>the</strong> fact, that <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r chirality enters with <strong>the</strong><br />

S-profiles <strong>in</strong> (2.123), which for <strong>the</strong> zero modes are suppressed by x0 ≈ v/MKK, see<br />

(2.149). The magnitude of <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs depends on <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>the</strong> propagator and<br />

<strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g angle θ. For θ = π/4, <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs become purely axial and one could<br />

speak of a 5D axigluon. In a slight abuse of language, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g, this notation<br />

will also be used for differ<strong>in</strong>g mix<strong>in</strong>g angles. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, however, <strong>in</strong> contributions<br />

to <strong>the</strong> diagrams responsible for C4, <strong>the</strong> dependence on <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g angle cancels, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> contributions to <strong>the</strong> purely left- and right-handed operators show <strong>the</strong> proportionality<br />

C1 ∼ tan 2 θ and � C1 ∼ cot 2 θ.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> contributions to C4 from <strong>the</strong> axigluon KK tower will lead to a<br />

cancellation of <strong>the</strong> contribution from <strong>the</strong> gluon KK tower will <strong>the</strong>refore only depend<br />

on <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g propagators which can <strong>in</strong>duce flavor changes at<br />

both vertices. These terms are fixed by <strong>the</strong> boundary conditions of Gµ and Aµ. As<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 2.3, <strong>the</strong> gluon must have Neumann BCs on both branes, with <strong>the</strong><br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g propagator (2.86). The only contribution to ∆F = 2 processes arise<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore from overlap <strong>in</strong>tegrals with <strong>the</strong> fermion profiles and <strong>the</strong> first term <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

second l<strong>in</strong>e of (2.86), which is ∼ t 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!