On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />
Here <strong>the</strong> subscript at <strong>the</strong> vertical bar reads “evaluated at <strong>the</strong> respective scale”. Therefore,<br />
<strong>the</strong> quark masses are given by<br />
mq ∼ b 〈QQ〉� � ETC<br />
Λ 2 ETC<br />
= b NTCΛ 3 TC<br />
Λ 2 ETC<br />
, (1.13)<br />
where we have assumed that 〈QQ〉 � � = 〈QQ〉 ETC � � = NTC Λ TC 3 TC . S<strong>in</strong>ce ΛTC is set by<br />
<strong>the</strong> electroweak break<strong>in</strong>g scale, for fixed NTC, <strong>the</strong> scale ΛETC can be extracted from<br />
(1.13) if <strong>the</strong> physical quark masses are used as an <strong>in</strong>put. Allow<strong>in</strong>g for a step-wise<br />
break<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> extended symmetry at different scales Λ1 > Λ2 > Λ3 would make<br />
it even possible to dynamically generate <strong>the</strong> hierarchy between <strong>the</strong> three generations<br />
which will <strong>the</strong>refore obta<strong>in</strong> masses mq3 > mq2 > mq1 .<br />
However, ΛETC is severely constra<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> third type of contributions to (1.11),<br />
<strong>the</strong> c-terms, which generate FCNC processes suppressed by <strong>the</strong> same scale that enters<br />
<strong>the</strong> effective Yukawas. From Table 1.1 we know that even <strong>in</strong> more optimistic scenarios<br />
(assum<strong>in</strong>g no additional CP violation), this bound amounts to at least ΛETC > 10 3<br />
TeV, which translates <strong>in</strong> a maximal quark mass of (NTC < 10, ΛTC ∼ 1TeV)<br />
mq < b × 10 MeV . (1.14)<br />
Especially <strong>the</strong> large mass of <strong>the</strong> top quark poses <strong>the</strong>refore a problem for <strong>the</strong>ories where<br />
<strong>the</strong> Higgs is described by a bound state.<br />
This problem can be attenuated by consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ories that are not like QCD [20].<br />
In a QCD-like <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>the</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>g is fast because asymptotic freedom<br />
sets <strong>in</strong> quickly above ΛQCD, as illustrated on <strong>the</strong> upper left panel of Figure 1.2. The<br />
techniquark condensate will <strong>the</strong>refore stay roughly <strong>the</strong> same between <strong>the</strong> ETC scale<br />
and <strong>the</strong> TC scale and <strong>the</strong> assumption go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to (1.13) is justified. More precisely,<br />
<strong>the</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g is given by<br />
〈QQ〉 � �� ΛETC<br />
� = exp<br />
ETC<br />
ΛTC<br />
dµ<br />
µ γm(α(µ))<br />
�<br />
〈QQ〉 � � , (1.15)<br />
TC<br />
and QCD-like runn<strong>in</strong>g corresponds to an anomalous dimension γm(α(µ)) ≈ γα(µ)<br />
≈ γ/ ln(µ), which results <strong>in</strong> a power-logarithmic enhancement factor proportional<br />
to ln(ΛETC) γ / ln(ΛTC) γ , similar to QCD radiative corrections to semileptonic electroweak<br />
processes.<br />
For general strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ories, such a behaviour is not mandatory. It may<br />
well be, that <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>g evolves slowly for a large range of scales, before asymptotic<br />
freedom sets <strong>in</strong>, as depicted on <strong>the</strong> lower left panel of Figure 1.2. In such a case, <strong>the</strong><br />
coupl<strong>in</strong>g stays close to a constant, so that γm(α(µ)) ≈ γα(µ) ≈ γα ∗ and <strong>the</strong> radiative<br />
corrections give a power-law enhancement factor (ΛETC/ΛTC) γ . In terms of <strong>the</strong> beta<br />
function, this behaviour corresponds to <strong>the</strong> convergence to a conformal fixed po<strong>in</strong>t,<br />
but not quite reach<strong>in</strong>g it, as illustrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower right panel of Figure 1.2. Yang-<br />
Mills <strong>the</strong>ories with this behaviour are called walk<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g walk<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technicolor (WTC) <strong>the</strong>ories allow for a significant amplification of <strong>the</strong> a-and b-terms<br />
<strong>in</strong> (1.11), while <strong>the</strong> FCNC <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g c-terms, which do not couple to <strong>the</strong> technicolor<br />
sector, still feel <strong>the</strong> full ETC scale suppression. In <strong>the</strong> WTC scenario, we can thus