On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A t FB ���<br />
8.75<br />
8.70<br />
8.65<br />
8.60<br />
2 4 6 8 10<br />
MKK �TeV�<br />
4.5. Numerical Analysis 169<br />
SU�3�C<br />
Figure 4.8: The forward backward asymmetry At FB <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal RS model plotted<br />
for <strong>the</strong> complete dataset versus MKK. The red l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> SM value.<br />
asymmetry as envisioned. Given that ˜ CV uū > 0 is a robust prediction of <strong>the</strong> RS framework,<br />
as long as <strong>the</strong> top quark is ma<strong>in</strong>ly composite, we conclude that <strong>the</strong> corrections<br />
to At FB are necessarily negative.<br />
This feature is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.8, which shows <strong>the</strong> predictions for <strong>the</strong> RS corrections<br />
to <strong>the</strong> forward-backward asymmetry for our complete dataset, plotted versus<br />
<strong>the</strong> KK scale. The central value of <strong>the</strong> SM prediction is <strong>in</strong>dicated by <strong>the</strong> red l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
It is evident, that <strong>the</strong> maximal atta<strong>in</strong>able effects amount to not even −0.05%. For<br />
all parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>the</strong> correction to <strong>the</strong> total <strong>in</strong>clusive cross section is larger than<br />
<strong>the</strong> contribution to <strong>the</strong> asymmetric cross section, which fixes <strong>the</strong> sign of <strong>the</strong> overall<br />
correction. Ano<strong>the</strong>r representation of <strong>the</strong> small effects can be found <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.10,<br />
which shows that <strong>the</strong> scatter plot of <strong>the</strong> complete parameter set <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> � C V uū− � C A uū plane<br />
ends up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> t<strong>in</strong>y red region. These results should be contrasted with <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />
[124], which f<strong>in</strong>ds positive corrections to <strong>the</strong> t¯t forward-backward asymmetry of up to<br />
5.6% (7%) aris<strong>in</strong>g from KK gluons (Z ′ -boson exchange) at LO. In <strong>the</strong> latter article,<br />
sizable corrections to ˜ C A q¯q arise s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 5D doublet and s<strong>in</strong>glet light-quark fields are<br />
localized at different ends of <strong>the</strong> extra dimension by choos<strong>in</strong>g cuL = cdL ∈ [−0.4, 0.4]<br />
(IR-localized) and cuR = cdR = −0.8 (UV-localized).10 This will sabotage <strong>the</strong> generation<br />
of hierarchical masses and mix<strong>in</strong>gs on <strong>the</strong> basis of fundamental anarchic parameters.<br />
As a consequence, one would have to re<strong>in</strong>troduce a structure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamental<br />
Yukawas <strong>in</strong> order to make such a model viable.<br />
10 Notice that <strong>the</strong> convention of <strong>the</strong> bulk mass parameters used <strong>in</strong> [124] differs from ours by an<br />
overall sign.