On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66 Chapter 2. The Randall Sundrum Model and its Holographic Interpretation<br />
modifications.<br />
The 5D Lagrangian is given by <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>in</strong> (2.12) m<strong>in</strong>us <strong>the</strong> SU(3)C terms and (2.13).<br />
Analogue to <strong>the</strong> SM, we def<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and<br />
W ± 1 � 1<br />
M = √ WM ∓ iW<br />
2<br />
2 �<br />
M ,<br />
ZM =<br />
AM =<br />
MW = vg5<br />
1<br />
�<br />
g2 5 + g ′2<br />
�<br />
g5W<br />
5<br />
3 M − g ′ �<br />
5BM , (2.94)<br />
1<br />
� g 2 5 + g ′2<br />
5<br />
� ′<br />
g 5W 3 �<br />
M + g5BM ,<br />
2 , MZ = v� g 2 5<br />
2<br />
+ g′2<br />
5<br />
, (2.95)<br />
where g5 and g ′ 5 are <strong>the</strong> 5D gauge coupl<strong>in</strong>gs of SU(2)L and U(1)Y , respectively. The<br />
covariant derivative act<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> Higgs reads<br />
DµH = 1<br />
�<br />
−i<br />
√<br />
2<br />
√ 2 � ∂µϕ + + MW W + � �<br />
µ<br />
+ terms bi-l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong> fields, (2.96)<br />
∂µh + i (∂µϕ3 + MZ Zµ)<br />
and <strong>the</strong> brane Higgs <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong> accordance with (2.76) <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g gauge fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
terms,<br />
LGF = − 1<br />
�<br />
∂<br />
2ξ<br />
µ �<br />
1<br />
Aµ − ξ MKKt ∂t<br />
t A5<br />
�� 2<br />
− 1<br />
�<br />
∂<br />
2ξ<br />
µ Zµ − ξ<br />
�<br />
δ(t − 1) kMZ ϕ3 + 2MKK t∂t<br />
2<br />
− 1<br />
�<br />
∂<br />
ξ<br />
µ W + µ − ξ<br />
�<br />
2<br />
�<br />
× ∂ µ W − µ − ξ<br />
2<br />
δ(t − 1) kMW ϕ + + 2MKK t∂t<br />
1<br />
t Z5<br />
��2 1<br />
t W + 5<br />
�<br />
δ(t − 1) kMW ϕ − 1<br />
+ 2MKK t∂t<br />
t W − 5<br />
��<br />
��<br />
, (2.97)<br />
<strong>in</strong> which (2.55) has been applied <strong>in</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g to t-coord<strong>in</strong>ates for all scalar components.<br />
More generally, <strong>the</strong> gauge fix<strong>in</strong>g parameters could have been chosen different<br />
for each gauge fix<strong>in</strong>g term, but for convenience <strong>the</strong>y are set equal. We will <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g concentrate on terms quadratic <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fields. It is however straightforward<br />
to implement three and four gauge boson terms. Account<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>etic terms of<br />
<strong>the</strong> gauge bosons and <strong>the</strong> Higgs, as well as for <strong>the</strong> gauge fix<strong>in</strong>g terms, results <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>