05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5. Implications for O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Theories</strong> 125<br />

would vanish, if <strong>the</strong> 5D doublet and s<strong>in</strong>glet would decompose <strong>in</strong>to purely left- and<br />

right-handed 4D fields. The mix<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced by <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to a brane-localized<br />

Higgs are <strong>the</strong> reason for <strong>the</strong> cancellation be<strong>in</strong>g not perfect, and those terms do also<br />

appear for <strong>the</strong> example of a purely left-handed coupl<strong>in</strong>g above. This is however rooted<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fermion implementation, which can be seen by <strong>the</strong> fact that one can not f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>the</strong>se terms based on <strong>the</strong> propagator (3.61) alone.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> IR localized Higgs has ano<strong>the</strong>r effect, not directly evident from (3.61).<br />

Because it gives masses to <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation with axial vector coupl<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

composite mesons will have a different mass <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> ones with vectorial<br />

coupl<strong>in</strong>gs which do not <strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>the</strong> composite Higgs. The term <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

of (3.66) measures <strong>the</strong> amount by which this mass splitt<strong>in</strong>g sets off <strong>the</strong> cancellation,<br />

which expla<strong>in</strong>s why it must be proportional to <strong>the</strong> Higgs vev. In <strong>the</strong> propagator we<br />

encountered <strong>the</strong> responsible terms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis of <strong>the</strong> (DD) BCs <strong>in</strong> Section 2.3.<br />

There is good reason to believe that <strong>the</strong>se conclusions carry over to a composite <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

which cannot be described by a holographic dual. Conformal Technicolor, which was<br />

shortly discussed <strong>in</strong> section 1.1 is such a small N strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory, which<br />

features a composite Higgs but no composite fermions. It does <strong>the</strong>refore not expla<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> hierarchies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> quark sector and has no built <strong>in</strong> RS-GIM, but it solves <strong>the</strong><br />

hierarchy problem by assum<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension of <strong>the</strong> Higgs mass operator<br />

is ∆ H † H = 4, while ∆H � 1. If it were possible to describe CTC by a 5D <strong>the</strong>ory, it<br />

would correspond to a model <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> whole SM model field content is on <strong>the</strong> UV<br />

brane and only <strong>the</strong> Higgs extends <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> bulk, but stays close to <strong>the</strong> UV brane <strong>in</strong><br />

order to allow for it to have a small scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension, so that <strong>the</strong> Yukawa <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

are only slightly irrelevant [29]. We concluded, that it may be <strong>the</strong> only feasible way to<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g an explanation of <strong>the</strong> hierarchy problem based on a strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>in</strong><br />

agreement with experimental constra<strong>in</strong>ts if it should turn out that quarks of all flavors<br />

are elementary particles. It is however strongly constra<strong>in</strong>ed from numerical analyses<br />

<strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with flavor constra<strong>in</strong>ts and already ruled out, if <strong>the</strong> new resonances<br />

do not respect additional flavor symmetries [30].<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> results obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last section will also hold for a small N <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

can not be computed. It is however encourag<strong>in</strong>g that QCD, which isn’t exactly a<br />

large N <strong>the</strong>ory does not only exhibit rho-photon mix<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> complete analogy with <strong>the</strong><br />

elementary-composite mix<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dual descriptions of RS models, but also features<br />

a vector meson octet, which corresponds to <strong>the</strong> global SU(3)V symmetry of (quantum)<br />

QCD. In <strong>the</strong> holographic dual, this octet would be <strong>the</strong> first KK mode of a gauged<br />

bulk flavor SU(3)V .<br />

If <strong>the</strong> global symmetry of such a small N <strong>the</strong>ory were SU(3)D × SU(3)S, it is not<br />

too far fetched to assume that <strong>the</strong>re would be mesons for <strong>the</strong>se global charges as well.<br />

The result<strong>in</strong>g loosen<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> flavor bounds is shown by <strong>the</strong> available parameter space<br />

for <strong>the</strong> extended model <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ∆ H † H − ∆H plane <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.8, shaded <strong>in</strong> green. It<br />

is achieved by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> coefficients of <strong>the</strong> dangerous mixed chirality operators<br />

from <strong>the</strong> analysis. For comparison, <strong>the</strong> bound for m<strong>in</strong>imal CTC as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.4<br />

is also plotted, <strong>the</strong> blue shaded region is generically excluded by numerical analyses.<br />

<strong>On</strong>ly a small corner of parameter space opens up, but <strong>the</strong> situation is actually better

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!