05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

δg b R /δgb L ∼ F (cbR )2 /F (cbL )2 for δg b = (g b RS −gb SM )/gb SM<br />

3.1. Electroweak Precision Observables 99<br />

, which is typically of <strong>the</strong> order<br />

of a few percent, because cbL is more IR localized <strong>in</strong> order to help realiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> large<br />

top mass <strong>in</strong> (2.158). The scal<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> plot <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> left panel of Figure 3.3 however<br />

makes <strong>the</strong> gb R corrections completely <strong>in</strong>visible. As a consequence, our set of parameter<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts, which is chosen so that <strong>the</strong> correct quark masses and mix<strong>in</strong>gs are reproduced<br />

(see Appendix A for details), lies entirely <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> red band shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> left panel of<br />

Figure 3.3 and <strong>the</strong>refore fails to agree with <strong>the</strong> experiment with<strong>in</strong> 3σ for <strong>the</strong> majority<br />

of po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Note, that <strong>the</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g of Figure 3.3 distorts <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re are still 10% of <strong>the</strong><br />

parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3σ ellipse. Translat<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>to a constra<strong>in</strong>t for MKK would<br />

yield a very strong bound. <strong>On</strong>e can <strong>in</strong>voke <strong>the</strong> reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variance <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

<strong>in</strong> section 2.5 <strong>in</strong> order to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> parameter corner<br />

which is <strong>in</strong> agreement with this constra<strong>in</strong>t. By reshuffl<strong>in</strong>g between F (cbL ) and F (cbR )<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g (2.169), for η < 1, one <strong>in</strong>creases δgb R /δgb L . For η = 1/2(1/3), about 35(45)%<br />

of <strong>the</strong> parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts do at least not aggravate <strong>the</strong> already large discrepancy between<br />

<strong>the</strong> SM and <strong>the</strong> experiment. Thus, parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts with strongly IR localized<br />

right-handed bottom quarks tend to give less dangerous corrections to <strong>the</strong> global fit<br />

<strong>in</strong> (3.14).<br />

It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to discuss <strong>the</strong> implications for <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory of such a considerable<br />

reparametrization. Scal<strong>in</strong>g down F (cbL ) will not only enlarge F (cbR ), but also F (ctR ),<br />

<strong>the</strong> zero mode of <strong>the</strong> right-handed top, which is already strongly IR localized. In a<br />

generalization of this shift to all generations, one can assume that all doublets are extremely<br />

UV localized and all s<strong>in</strong>glets shifted towards <strong>the</strong> IR. The dual <strong>the</strong>ory of such<br />

a model would have, to a good approximation, only right-handed quarks composites,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> left-handed quarks are elementaries. This right-handed compositeness was<br />

found to be a very attractive idea <strong>in</strong> [149], <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> relevance for <strong>the</strong> Z¯bb vertex<br />

was however not po<strong>in</strong>ted out. In <strong>the</strong> later sections we will get back to this scenario<br />

and check <strong>the</strong> compatibility with o<strong>the</strong>r observables.<br />

This situation is also ameliorated by <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g between <strong>the</strong> Z zero mode and <strong>the</strong><br />

additional neutral composite vector bosons of <strong>the</strong> SU(2)R present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> custodially<br />

protected RS model [148]. This is especially <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g, because as discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

previous section, <strong>the</strong> scalar sector of any extension of <strong>the</strong> SM should respect <strong>the</strong> cus-<br />

todial symmetry <strong>in</strong> order to not get <strong>in</strong>to conflict with <strong>the</strong> oblique parameters. The<br />

mix<strong>in</strong>g elim<strong>in</strong>ates completely <strong>the</strong> L enhanced term <strong>in</strong> gb L and <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>the</strong> L enhanced<br />

term <strong>in</strong> g b R by L → 3c2 w<br />

s 2 w<br />

L ≈ 10L. Therefore, corrections to g b L<br />

are dom<strong>in</strong>ated by <strong>the</strong><br />

terms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second l<strong>in</strong>e of (3.10), which can now account for both negative and<br />

positive modifications, controlled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terplay of <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>glet down quark localization<br />

parameters of all generations. Choos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> correct quark representations under<br />

<strong>the</strong> enlarged symmetry group and assum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bulk symmetric under <strong>the</strong> exchange<br />

and make <strong>the</strong>m purely<br />

SU(2)L ↔ SU(2)R, will fur<strong>the</strong>r reduce <strong>the</strong> correction to g b L

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!