On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.6. The Extension of <strong>the</strong> Scalar Sector 129<br />
<strong>the</strong> RS flavor problem is not solved.<br />
The scalar sector <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next section will allow for dimension four Yukawa<br />
coupl<strong>in</strong>gs, so that <strong>the</strong> vev is necessarily connected to <strong>the</strong> electroweak scale and a<br />
sufficient suppression of <strong>the</strong> dangerous FCNCs is achieved.<br />
A Realistic Higgs Sector<br />
In order to evade <strong>the</strong> tension between a realistic top Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> suppression<br />
of contributions to ɛK, we consider a scalar sector <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Higgs which is responsible<br />
for EWSB also carries color charges. Such an extension is shortly mentioned<br />
for a chiral color extension of <strong>the</strong> SM <strong>in</strong> [195]. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
have already been given <strong>in</strong> (3.60), and <strong>the</strong> additional terms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian read<br />
�<br />
δ(|φ| − π)<br />
��DµHu � †� � µ<br />
LS = Tr<br />
D Hu<br />
rc<br />
� ��DµHd � †� � µ<br />
+ T r<br />
D Hd<br />
�<br />
+ � Dµh � �<br />
†� � µ<br />
D h − V (h, Hu, Hd) , (3.79)<br />
where <strong>the</strong> potential will aga<strong>in</strong> be given <strong>in</strong> Appendix D. The three scalar fields carry<br />
<strong>the</strong> quantum numbers<br />
SU(3)D SU(3)S SU(2)L U(1)Y<br />
Hu 3 ¯3 2 − 1<br />
2<br />
Hd 3 ¯3 2 1<br />
2<br />
h 1 1 2 1<br />
2<br />
The Higgs with SM quantum numbers will <strong>in</strong> this section be denoted by h for a better<br />
differentiation, and <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g covariant derivative given by (2.96) does not<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> color group gauge bosons. Notice also, that <strong>the</strong> Dirichlet BCs<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UV can be modeled by putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian (3.73) on <strong>the</strong> UV brane and<br />
consequentially <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g a vev 〈S〉 ≈ MPl. 10<br />
There need to be different color charged Higgs fields for up and down quarks, because<br />
<strong>the</strong> complex conjugated Hd transforms as H †<br />
d ∼ (¯3, 3) under SU(3)D × SU(3)S and<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore if it is <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> up-Yukawa <strong>in</strong>teractions it will not saturate <strong>the</strong> quark<br />
color charges11 . The SM Higgs h will give Yukawa <strong>in</strong>teractions for <strong>the</strong> leptons. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
one could write down effective lepton Yukawas with only <strong>the</strong> two color charged<br />
fields, because h ∼ HdHdHu s<strong>in</strong>ce 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = (6 ⊕ ¯3) ⊗ 3 ∋ 1. However, <strong>the</strong> potential<br />
V (Hu, Hd) has a global U(3) × U(3) symmetry, while <strong>the</strong> vacuum is <strong>in</strong>variant under<br />
SU(3)C × U(1). This will lead to n<strong>in</strong>e Goldstone bosons from which only eight will<br />
be absorbed by <strong>the</strong> axigluons <strong>in</strong> order to become massive. It is <strong>the</strong>refore necessary<br />
10<br />
A scalar sector on <strong>the</strong> UV brane may not <strong>in</strong>clude an electroweak doublet, because this would<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduce Yukawa <strong>in</strong>teractions on <strong>the</strong> UV brane.<br />
11<br />
Notice, that for a Higgs bidoublet as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> custodial model, <strong>the</strong>re is no problem <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
down both Yukawa terms with one field, because for SU(2) <strong>the</strong> fundamental and anti-fundamental<br />
representation are isomorphic.