05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 Chapter 2. The Randall Sundrum Model and its Holographic Interpretation<br />

F G<br />

H<br />

UV brane IR brane<br />

F<br />

(ND)<br />

G<br />

(DD)<br />

I<br />

(NN)<br />

H<br />

(DN)<br />

Figure 2.6: Illustration of <strong>the</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g by BCs at <strong>the</strong> UV and IR brane. In <strong>the</strong> dual<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>the</strong> subgroup F is gauged by elementary fermions and <strong>the</strong> group H leaves<br />

<strong>the</strong> composite sector <strong>in</strong>variant after conf<strong>in</strong>ement. The right hand side shows a Venn<br />

diagram of <strong>the</strong> groups. The BCs of <strong>the</strong> fields liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g complements<br />

are also given (For example, fields <strong>in</strong> G may have any comb<strong>in</strong>ation of BCs, but fields<br />

<strong>in</strong> G\(F ∪ H) must have Dirichlet BCs on both branes).<br />

for all o<strong>the</strong>r comb<strong>in</strong>ations. We will consider <strong>the</strong> consequences of Goldstones <strong>the</strong>orem<br />

<strong>in</strong> a situation <strong>in</strong> which break<strong>in</strong>g on both branes can appear, and its implications for<br />

<strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory.<br />

In general, one has a bulk gauge group G, which is broken down to <strong>the</strong> subgroup<br />

F on <strong>the</strong> UV brane by explicit break<strong>in</strong>g through weakly gaug<strong>in</strong>g this subgroup <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> elementary sector, see Figure 2.6. The dual <strong>the</strong>ory is given by <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian<br />

(2.41), where a denotes <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices of <strong>the</strong> generators of F . <strong>On</strong> <strong>the</strong> IR brane, G is<br />

broken down to <strong>the</strong> subgroup H, which is <strong>the</strong> subgroup that still leaves <strong>the</strong> composite<br />

sector <strong>in</strong>variant after conf<strong>in</strong>ement sets <strong>in</strong>. We will call <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tersection of <strong>the</strong>se groups<br />

I = F ∩ H. <strong>On</strong>e <strong>the</strong>refore expects dim G/H = dim G − dim H Goldstone bosons<br />

from <strong>the</strong> spontaneous symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g. However, dim F/I of those will be eaten,<br />

because <strong>the</strong>re exist elementary gauge fields correspond<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> generators of this<br />

spontaneously broken subgroup. In <strong>the</strong> end, one thus has dim I massless gauge bosons<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> elementary sector and NPNGB = dim G/H −dim F/I pseudo-Nambu Goldstone<br />

bosons, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y correspond to explicitly broken generators. The general setup<br />

is depicted <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.6, where <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g BCs for <strong>the</strong> vector part of <strong>the</strong><br />

bulk gauge fields have been given. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g takes place via BCs, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

no scalar degrees of freedom on <strong>the</strong> brane. The longitud<strong>in</strong>al degrees of freedom of<br />

<strong>the</strong> gauge bosons are <strong>in</strong> this setup provided by <strong>the</strong> A5 components of <strong>the</strong> residual<br />

dim G/(F ∪ H), which must have Neumann BCs on both branes and thus develop<br />

zero modes, compare Section 4 of [62]. Both approaches, symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g via a<br />

brane field or via BCs, give <strong>the</strong> same number of degrees of freedoms. <strong>On</strong>e can fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>in</strong>fer, that <strong>the</strong> A5 mode of a bulk gauge field is <strong>the</strong> holographic dual of a composite<br />

pseudo Nambu Goldstone boson.<br />

Higgsless TC is <strong>the</strong>refore described by an RS model without a brane scalar and <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g symmetries realized <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk and on <strong>the</strong> branes respectively (here, and<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g scenarios, only <strong>the</strong> electroweak sector plays a role and <strong>the</strong> not noted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!