08.01.2013 Views

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

If, on the other hand, the forms of thought are said to be derived<br />

from sense experience itself---and this is apparently the<br />

Thomist contention---then the very first act of knowledge<br />

would be impossible: significant thought cannot begin unless<br />

the intellect has the basic forms of thought that make initial<br />

predication possible. Unless the proclivities or tendencies of<br />

intelligence are innate, the very first universals could never be<br />

abstracted, and knowledge would be impossible---which is selfcontradictory<br />

skepticism.<br />

(3) Again, if there are no innate categories of thought, why,<br />

as the Thomist maintains, should the active intellect concrete<br />

initially the so-called first principles? The answer is that these<br />

principles are the basis of all further knowledge: but why<br />

should they not also be the basis of a conscious knowledge of<br />

the principles themselves? The distinction between the basis of<br />

knowledge in the one case from that in the other is purely arbitrary.<br />

And the only satisfactory explanation is that the intellect<br />

must operate with such first principles in the initial act of<br />

knowledge: not, of course, in the sense that these prin- [[Page<br />

126]] ciples are present from the beginning as ideas in consciousness,<br />

but rather in the sense that they are modes of<br />

thought wrought into the very structure of intellect itself. But<br />

this is a repudiation of empiricist moorings.<br />

After all, if the first principles are the initial achievements of<br />

intellect, there must be some structure within the intellect which<br />

causes the abstraction of intelligibles in this order. The<br />

Thomists themselves admit this when they assert that the aptitude<br />

for the formation of first principles is in the soul initially.<br />

But what is this, if not the admission that the principles themselves<br />

are innate structures of intellect which rise gradually to<br />

consciousness through external or internal experience? The potentiality<br />

of intellect to achieve these principles is inexplicable<br />

on any other basis, especially when we realize that just these<br />

principles are in fact basic to all knowledge.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!