roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

Since the whole range of objections against the teleological
argument as correctly formulated has been found to be invalid
and freighted with both logical and experiential contradiction, I
therefore conclude that the teleological argument is valid and
that the absolutely necessary being is a personal intelligence
whose nature is absolute goodness.
Conclusion on the Whole Destructive Argument of Critical
Naturalism
The rational case for theism has at last emerged triumphant
over its foes at every point of debate: the clouds of objection
fade into mist and the mist vanishes into oblivion until now we
stand unquestionably confronted with the divine Being Himself.
Since both the cosmological and the teleological arguments
have been defended against the objections of a destructive naturalism.
I therefore con- [[365]] clude that these arguments are
valid, that God exists as the ultimate explanation and ground of
the whole complex of reality: God, that is, as the absolutely
necessary being of intelligent nature which embodies absolute
goodness.
CONCLUSION
Our path ahs been long, but it has brought us at last to the
general answer for the questions with which our investigation
began: the broad outlines of a philosophy may not be asserted.
The problem of epistemology has been solved in terms of a
rational empiricism which teaches that all knowledge is a union
of categorical and experiential elements: the mind comes to ex-