08.01.2013 Views

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it must be held that I directly perform the operation of each intermediary<br />

factor, if I am to be the ultimate explanation of the<br />

particular orientation of the series. Similarly with God, although<br />

it is true that God sustains the operation of second<br />

causes in a manner that transcends my sustaining of the operating<br />

of intermediary factors by my intent, purpose, and initial<br />

action in a given situation. So Tennant, <strong>com</strong>menting on the organic<br />

realm: “The fact of organic evolution, even when the<br />

maximum of instrumentality is accredited to what is figuratively<br />

called natural selection, is not in<strong>com</strong>patible with teleology<br />

on a grander scale. . . . This kind of teleology does not set<br />

out from the particular adaptations in individual organisms or<br />

species so much as from considerations as to the progressiveness<br />

of the evolutionary process and as to the organic realm as a<br />

whole.” (Footnote 67: Ibid., p. 84.) Explanation in terms of<br />

proximate causes, even if it eliminate appeal to intelligent will<br />

as the ultimate explanation of the whole progress of successive<br />

adaptations in nature. [[321]]<br />

But as a matter of fact, even if the evolutionary explanation<br />

of the organic realm were granted it appears that the process is<br />

not explicable merely in terms of proximate causes, but that it<br />

requires a progressive and continuing intelligent guidance for<br />

its sufficient explanation. Of course, this does not mean that<br />

proximate causes are not operative at every point in the process;<br />

what it does mean is that the particular mode of their operation<br />

is explicable only in teleological terms.<br />

The “survival of the fittest” presupposes the arrival of the fit,<br />

and, as Tennant remarks, “throws no light thereupon.” (Footnote<br />

68: Ibid., p. 85.) This is not to say that there are no proximate<br />

causes from which the “fittest” arrives: but rather that,<br />

merely because a chance arrival of anything at all is, as we have<br />

already explained at length, absolutely improbable, the fittest<br />

could not conceivably appear without the guidance of intelligent<br />

will in setting up the whole series of proximate causes and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!