08.01.2013 Views

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nor will it be difficult to see that such an analytical presuppositionalism<br />

is basically inconsistent with any ultimate acceptance<br />

of the metaphysical presuppositionalism which argues<br />

that the acceptance of a first metaphysical principle is a matter<br />

of unjustifiable assumption: for here we are offering to show<br />

exactly the validity and necessity of the first metaphysical principle<br />

itself by indicating that obviously its acceptance is the<br />

only basis on which an intelligible explanation of experience<br />

can ultimately be given. Of course, there is a starting-point; but<br />

it is not the assumption of the first reality: it is rather the epistemological<br />

starting-point of rational empiricism. It may be<br />

both interesting and <strong>com</strong>forting to hold at the same time both<br />

that we must assume God’s existence in order to arrive at it, and<br />

that we can show that only god’s existence postulates an adequate<br />

explanation of reality---it may, I say, be interesting and<br />

<strong>com</strong>forting, but it is not rational!<br />

Categorical or experiential presuppositionalism, finally, is<br />

the method of showing that a consistent application of the rational<br />

categories to the totality of available data must conclude<br />

the validity and truth of some ultimate metaphysical principle.<br />

This procedure is similar to that of the preceding type, except<br />

that with analytical presuppositionalism we were attempting to<br />

test the validity of a system of thought regarded as already constructed,<br />

whereas categorical pre- [[157]] suppositionalism attempts<br />

a more positive approach to experience with the goal of<br />

showing that the data available imply definitively the existence<br />

of some ultimate real. The former approach, briefly, was a<br />

negative method for testing the structure of a world view; while<br />

the present approach is a method, cast in the same mold, for arriving<br />

at that world view by a positive interpretation of experience.<br />

Thus, for example, theism asserts that the only adequate explanation<br />

for the intelligibility of experience is the truth of the<br />

proposition that God exists. Some Christian thinkers, realizing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!