08.01.2013 Views

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

roger wasson company - cheapersunglasses.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

not fruitfully applicable in this problem, and no theoretical conclusion<br />

can be drawn. (Thus saith Kant!)<br />

Answer to the argument.---In the case of this second antinomy<br />

(actually the fourth in Kant's own list), it is impossible to<br />

espouse the whole thesis as correct, since Kant not only asserts<br />

there the existence of an absolutely necessary being, but attempts<br />

to argue that this being must itself be a member of the<br />

temporal series. The argument for an absolutely necessary being<br />

appears to be valid enough and is in fact merely the formulation<br />

of the cosmological argument. But the second part of the<br />

thesis---that the absolute being must belong to the temporal series---is<br />

a wholly untenable position. Not only has such a view<br />

been amply refuted in numerous previous contexts, but Kant<br />

himself, in his formulation of the antithesis that there is no absolutely<br />

necessary being, clearly and cogently refutes the notion<br />

that such a being can be either a part of the temporal series or<br />

the whole of it, since either of these positions reduces to selfcontradiction.<br />

Hence our only relevant task in this connection is to show<br />

that the assertion of an absolutely necessary being existing<br />

apart from the world is not subject to the self-contradiction that<br />

Kant alleges. His relevant argument here is that, since the<br />

cause of the world must initiate the temporal series, it must be a<br />

member of the series---and this he has already shown to be impossible.<br />

Now there are two ways of escaping the charge that is<br />

thus leveled against argumentative theism, both of which ways<br />

seem to me to be legitimate, though the first admittedly postpones<br />

the ultimate problem. The first mode of [[267]] escape<br />

consists in the fact that the whole question may be abstracted<br />

from the temporal framework by considering the totality of existence<br />

at a given isolated moment.<br />

Take, for example, the present moment in which I am writing<br />

these words. I am holding the pen which writes the words,<br />

but a whole series of conditions is at this very moment sustain-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!