28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

εn,x (µm)<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

4-2001<br />

8560A95<br />

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Z (cm)<br />

Figure 6.2 Beam emittance versus z. Each curve is for a different solenoid strength, i.e., values<br />

between 0.26 and 0.33 T in equal increments.<br />

Since the minimum rms spot size in Figure 6.1 for the conditions of the new working point is<br />

σ=0.41 mm, the current averaged over the slices is 96 A, and the average slice energy is 6.4<br />

MeV, the matched accelerating gradient of the traveling wave (TW) booster is required to be 35<br />

MV/m. Two SLAC 3-m accelerating structures are required to drive the beam out of the space<br />

charge dominated regime, resulting in an energy of 216 MeV in an 8-m long injector line<br />

(assuming a 0.5-m long drift in between the two structures and not including the gun structure<br />

upstream of the cathode). As expected, the second emittance minimum, which is 0.5 µm, now<br />

occurs downstream of the booster structures, at z=10 m. (This location will be taken as a<br />

reference position to quote emittance at the injector exit).<br />

Despite the good emittance resulting from this design, the necessary gradient to match the<br />

beam to the booster exceeds the limit of reliable performance by available SLAC 3-m structures.<br />

One solution is to shift the solenoid location downstream and set the solenoid strength so as to<br />

recover the new working point conditions. By doing so the resulting spot size at the waist is<br />

bigger and thus, from Eq. (6.3), a lower matched gradient is required.<br />

A lower gradient solution can also be achieved by increasing the focusing properties of the<br />

booster [12]. This can be done by means of standing wave (SW) structures or equivalently by a<br />

long solenoid around the first TW structure [11]. The second solution is chosen for the <strong>LCLS</strong><br />

design to simplify the rf system. Setting the desired accelerating field of the TW sections to 26<br />

MV/m and scanning the long solenoid strength, a very good working point is indicated for a<br />

longitudinal field of Bz=800 G. A beam dynamics simulation using HOMDYN indicates a very<br />

low emittance value, of 0.2 µm (thermal emittance not included) at 160 MeV as shown in<br />

Figure 6.3, while at the same time the other relevant <strong>LCLS</strong> requirements are very nearly fulfilled.<br />

For example, the peak current of 95 A is only slightly below the desired value. The energy spread<br />

6-7 ♦ I NJECTOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!