28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

Genesis is used for the FEL calculations. Ideally, Genesis would be used to perform full timedependent<br />

calculations for each simulated pulse. However, this would require ~10 7<br />

macroparticles per pulse, and is not practical. Instead, the output of Elegant is cut into 136<br />

longitudinal slices; chosen because it is near the number of slippage lengths in the bunch. Each<br />

slice is analyzed to obtain relevant first and second moments, i.e., energy, energy spread,<br />

centroids of particle position and angle, rms emittances, Twiss parameters, and beam current.<br />

Each slice is simulated independently in Genesis, under the implicit assumption that slices do not<br />

influence each other. The low- and high-energy tails of the beam are also removed, to avoid<br />

artificially inflating the rms energy spread.<br />

Jitter is included in the Parmela and Elegant simulations using gaussian random numbers<br />

with a ±3σ cut-off. The variation in gun charge output, Q, is modeled as<br />

Q = Q0[1+(0.03)⋅∆ϕl]⋅[1+∆El/El]⋅[1+∆Vg/Vg], where ∆ϕl is the laser phase error, ∆El/El is the<br />

relative laser energy error, and ∆Vg/Vg is the relative gun voltage error. The coefficient of (0.03)<br />

is an empirical value obtained from experiments with a BNL-style gun at the Low Energy<br />

Undulator Test Line (LEUTL) at APS/ANL [40].<br />

Table 7.21 Results of start-to-end jitter simulations using Parmela, Elegant, and Genesis.<br />

Parameter symbol units mean rms ½ quartile<br />

range<br />

FEL 3D power gain length L g m 3.53 0.19 0.13<br />

FEL output power P 0 GW 6.8 1.6 1.0<br />

Relative e − energy error (E 0 ≈ 14.346 GeV) ∆E/E 0 % 0 0.06 0.04<br />

Peak current I pk kA 3.3 0.27 0.17<br />

Bunch length (full-width of 80% core slices) ∆tFW fs 188 19 13<br />

RMS e − energy spread σδ<br />

10 −4<br />

0.8 0.07 0.03<br />

Horizontal normalized emittance γε x µm 0.80 0.02 0.01<br />

Vertical normalized emittance γε y µm 0.70 0.01 0.01<br />

Bunch arrival time 〈∆t〉 fs 0 45 31<br />

Horizontal centroid amplitude (% of beam size) A x % 84 8.0 4.3<br />

Vertical centroid amplitude (% of beam size) A y % 8.0 0.6 0.4<br />

Table 7.21 lists the results of simulations with 227 different beam pulses (i.e., random seeds).<br />

The quantities for which statistics are shown are averaged or summed over the central 80% of the<br />

slices (the “core slices”), which excludes from analysis the ends of the bunch, which are heavily<br />

corrupted by CSR and can be neglected for FEL evaluation. The bunch length is the full length of<br />

the core slices. The horizontal centroid amplitude, Ax, for a slice is defined as<br />

Ax 2 = [x 2 + (αxx + βxx′) 2 ]/(εxβx), where x and x′ are the position and angle of the centroid of the<br />

7-76 ♦ A C C E L E R A T O R

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!