28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.12 Beam-based Alignment<br />

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

8.12.1 Undulator Beam-Based Alignment<br />

The electron trajectory within the <strong>LCLS</strong> undulator needs to be straight to a high degree of<br />

accuracy so that the 1.5-Å radiation grows efficiently over each gain length. For the <strong>LCLS</strong>, this<br />

condition requires a trajectory straightness of a few microns over a ~10-meter length. This level is<br />

very difficult to achieve with component survey alignment techniques. For this reason, the final<br />

alignment will rely on empirical beam-based alignment, which makes use of beam position<br />

monitor (BPM) readings as a function of large, deliberate variations of the electron energy. The<br />

BPM measurements at various energies are analyzed and then converted to 1) quadrupole magnet<br />

transverse position offsets, 2) BPM readback offset corrections and 3) adjustments of the<br />

incoming beam position and angle at the undulator entrance (initial launch conditions). The<br />

alignment procedure is repeated three times in succession for the initial machine startup, and then<br />

one pass of the procedure is reapplied approximately once per month, as necessary. Between<br />

these infrequent applications, a fine steering technique will be used for daily trajectory control,<br />

and a fast feedback system will maintain the trajectory over the time scale of a few pulses. This<br />

section primarily discusses the most involved alignment procedure, which is applied during the<br />

initial machine commissioning period. The effects of various errors are included in a full<br />

simulation of the alignment procedure.<br />

8.12.1.1 Introduction<br />

The readback mi of the i th BPM, which measures the centroid of the transverse position of the<br />

electron bunch at location si along the beamline, can be written as<br />

i<br />

mi = θjC ij<br />

j =1<br />

∑ – b i<br />

, (8.64)<br />

where θj is the kick angle at point j (< i) due to a transversely misaligned quadrupole magnet or<br />

undulator pole field error upstream of BPM-i, Cij is the transfer coefficient which maps a beam<br />

angle at point j to a position at point i, and bi is the readback offset (mechanical misalignment<br />

and/or electrical bias) of the i th BPM. This is described graphically in Figure 8.40 where the<br />

BPMs are shown as circles. The kick angles in the figure are represented as dipoles, however they<br />

are completely equivalent to either quadrupole magnets with transverse displacements and/or<br />

field strength errors of the undulator poles. The quadrupole focusing within the undulator is not<br />

explicitly shown in the figure, but it is represented mathematically in the transfer coefficients, Cij.<br />

The initial launch conditions are ignored for now (more on this below).<br />

Since the kick angles θj are inversely proportional to beam momentum p, whereas the BPM<br />

offsets bi are independent of momentum, variations of the beam energy (momentum) can be used<br />

to measure both parameters simultaneously. This is clear by substituting a dipole field error, ∆Bj,<br />

(equivalent to a quadrupole misalignment) for θj and explicitly showing the momentum<br />

dependence of Eq. (8.64).<br />

U N D U L A T O R ♦ 8-73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!