28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

j th kick to the i th BPM. The equation, as written here, also indicates N BPMs, N kicks and two<br />

different momenta (k = 1,2).<br />

⎡ m11 ⎤ ⎡ –1 0 0<br />

⎢ ⎥ ⎢<br />

⎢ m21 ⎥ ⎢ 0 –1 0<br />

⎢ ⎥ ⎢<br />

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ <br />

⎢<br />

⎢<br />

m ⎥ ⎢<br />

N1 ⎥ = ⎢<br />

0 0 –1<br />

⎢ m12 ⎥ ⎢ –1 0 0<br />

⎢ ⎥ ⎢<br />

⎢ m22 ⎥ ⎢ 0 –1 0<br />

⎢<br />

⎢<br />

<br />

⎥ ⎢<br />

⎥ ⎢ <br />

⎣ ⎢ mN 2⎦<br />

⎥ ⎢<br />

⎣ 0 0 –1<br />

P11( 1)<br />

0 0 ⎤ ⎡ b1 ⎤<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

P21() 1 P22() 1 0 ⎥ ⎢ b2 ⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

PN1() 1 PN 2() 1 PNN() 1<br />

⎥ ⎢<br />

⎥<br />

b ⎥<br />

⋅ ⎢ N ⎥<br />

P11() 2 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ ∆B1 ⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

P21() 2 P22() 2 0 ⎥ ⎢ ∆B2⎥ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

PN1() 2 PN 2() 2 PNN() 2<br />

⎥<br />

⎦ ⎣ ⎢ ∆BN ⎦<br />

⎥<br />

(8.66)<br />

There are a very large number of undulator poles along the undulator (3762) and therefore<br />

too many to determine, so the BPM data are fitted to quadrupole magnet misalignments and BPM<br />

offsets only. Therefore, any BPM readback sensitivity to energy change will be identified as<br />

upstream quadrupole offsets, and the determined quadrupole misalignments (in the wiggle-plane)<br />

will necessarily be biased in order to best cancel the net dipole error (i.e., real localized pole<br />

errors plus quadrupole misalignment). The quality of this cancellation is examined in the<br />

simulation section described below. The non-wiggle plane has no dipoles and therefore the<br />

determined quadrupole positions in this plane will not be biased (unless pole roll errors or other<br />

stray magnetic fields exist). This is a significant advantage for the energy scan technique because<br />

all bend fields, without explicit knowledge of their source, are approximately canceled by biasing<br />

the final quadrupole positions in order to best remove the trajectory’s sensitivity to energy<br />

variations.<br />

To explicitly write Eq. (8.66) in terms of quadrupole misalignments, ∆Bj is replaced with<br />

the quadrupole magnet misalignment ∆xj, and Pij(k) is replaced with<br />

j ji j ji<br />

Pij(k) →[ 1 − Q11(k) ]R11(k) − Q21(k)R12<br />

(k)<br />

. (8.67)<br />

Where Q j 11(k) and Q j 21(k) are the thick-lens transfer matrix elements across the j th quadrupole<br />

magnet evaluated at the k th momentum, and R11 ji (k) and R12 ji (k) (=Cij) are the position-to-position<br />

and angle-to-position, respectively, transfer matrix elements from the exit of the j th quadrupole to<br />

the i th BPM, also evaluated at the k th momentum. Note, a thin lens quadrupole of pole-tip field B,<br />

radius r, and length has a focal length f = rp/B e.<br />

Then the right side of Eq. (8.67) reduces to –<br />

Cij(k)/f, where the minus sign indicates that a horizontally focusing quadrupole (1/f < 0) displaced<br />

in the positive direction (∆x > 0) will kick the beam in the positive direction.<br />

In practice, the linear system of Eq. (8.66) is solved by imposing ‘soft-constraints’ on the<br />

solutions to stabilize the system. The inclusion of the soft-constraints is equivalent to including<br />

the additional known information that the quadrupole and BPM offsets are zero to within a<br />

reasonable scale (e.g., ~1 mm). The constraints are not hard limits but rather weight the fit error<br />

U N D U L A T O R ♦ 8-75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!