28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

the 3% of the structures that follow the 4 m gaps. Therefore, using the asymptotic wakefields to<br />

represent the entire SLAC linac, and ignoring the transient effects, should result in very little<br />

error even for a 20-µm bunch.<br />

There are three other effects that can be important for short bunches: (1) The so-called<br />

“catch-up distance” effect: If the head of the beam generates a wakefield at a certain position in<br />

the linac, due to causality the tail does not feel the effect until a distance ~0.5a 2 /σz, which in<br />

this case is 2.5 m, later. Since this is a small fraction of the 550-meters of accelerating structure<br />

after the second compressor, this effect should not be important. (2) For σ z ≤ a/γ, which in this<br />

case is 0.3 µm, the impedance drops dramatically. Since the minimum bunch length is 20 µm, this<br />

effect should also not be important for the <strong>LCLS</strong>. (3) The effect of the resistivity of the iris<br />

surface is shown, in the following section, not to be a significant effect for the <strong>LCLS</strong> accelerator.<br />

Finally, it should be noted that the above estimates all assume that the bunch is gaussian,<br />

which it is not. The real bunch shape is rectangular with spikes at the edges of the distribution<br />

(see bottom of Figure 7.7). The Fourier transform of such a bunch shape reaches to higher<br />

frequencies than the gaussian approximation, and therefore the short bunch effects will become<br />

somewhat more pronounced than estimated above. However, even with this consideration, the<br />

calculated wake functions will accurately represent the wakefield effects in the linac for the<br />

<strong>LCLS</strong> project.<br />

7.9.4 Confirmations<br />

There have been confirmations, both theoretical and by measurement, of the calculated SLAC<br />

wake functions and, more recently, of the similarly calculated wake functions for the NLC and<br />

the DESY-SBLC linac. All of the measurements, however, have been done for bunch lengths<br />

significantly larger than the 20-µm of interest here. As to theoretical comparisons, the calculated<br />

SLAC wake functions have been confirmed, for gaussian bunches down to σz ≈ 0.5 mm, using the<br />

time domain program TBCI [61]. A time domain program exists that is able to obtain accurate<br />

results for short bunches in accelerating structures [62]. For a 100-µm bunch in the NLC<br />

structure, the results of this program, as well as the results of an independent frequency domain<br />

program [63], agree with our frequency domain results to within a few percent.<br />

As to confirmation by measurement in the SLC linac, the total wakefield-induced energy loss<br />

[64] and more recently the wakefield-induced voltage of a bunch [65], [66] have been shown to<br />

agree quite well, for bunch lengths down to 0.5 mm. Also, in the ASSET test facility, the short<br />

range transverse wakefield of a 0.5-mm bunch in the NLC structure has been measured, and the<br />

results agree quite well with the calculated results [67].<br />

7.9.5 Resistive Wall Wakefields<br />

In addition to geometric wakefields, the micro-bunch beyond BC2 experiences a longitudinal<br />

resistive wall (RW) wakefield which introduces a small coherent energy spread along the bunch<br />

[68], [70]. For a bunch which is much longer then the characteristic length, s 0,<br />

A C C E L E R A T O R ♦ 7-107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!