28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

The emittance compensating solenoid is physically 22.5 cm long. For the simulations it is<br />

placed against the downstream edge of the rf gun, which results in the center of the solenoidal<br />

field being 19.1 cm from the cathode surface. The field map (Figure 6.19) indicates that for this<br />

configuration the field at the cathode is essentially zero without the use of a bucking coil.<br />

6.6.2 Optimization for 140 MV/m<br />

Using only the gun, solenoid, and the immediately following drift space (i.e., no booster), a<br />

minimum value for the first emittance minimum along the drift was obtained by varying the<br />

solenoidal field and beam spot radius. A value of Bz = 3.15 kG and hard-edge radius of 1 mm was<br />

found to be optimum. The emittance minimum very nearly coincides with that of the new<br />

working point described in Section 6.1.3, <strong>Design</strong> Principles. The slightly larger value of BZ here<br />

is consistent with the solenoid being displaced somewhat downstream because of the physical<br />

interference with the gun structure.<br />

Next, including both the boosters (with an accelerating gradient of 24.1 MV/m) and the<br />

second solenoid (S2), the emittance at the booster exit was minimized by varying the booster<br />

locations (keeping the drift distance between the two sections fixed at 0.5 m. The results are<br />

summarized in Figure 6.22, which is really a compilation of 12 independent figures. The<br />

optimum position of the entrance to the first section was found to be 1.4 m from the cathode (the<br />

S2 field was -1.5 kG). Note that as the booster is moved toward the position for the minimum<br />

emittance, the emittance decreases more gently and eventually monotonically, approximating the<br />

shape shown in Figure 6.3. Finally the emittance was minimized by varying the field and<br />

position of S2. An emittance minimum was found for a field of -1.75 kG and by positioning the<br />

start of the solenoid at 1.43 m with respect to the cathode. Finally, a thermal emittance of 0.3 µm<br />

was added to the PARMELA deck [8]. Using these parameters and an input pulse rise time of<br />

0.35 ps, a final emittance of 0.8 µm was obtained for a 20 K-particle run. See Figure 6.23. Using<br />

the same parameters but substituting a rise time of 0.7 ps for the input pulse increased the<br />

emittance by about 10%.<br />

6-50 ♦ I NJECTOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!