28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

linac, so that the entire linac and injector configuration is technically much less challenging than<br />

that required at 1.5 Å.<br />

The final absolute energy spread will decrease by a factor of two with the reduced<br />

compression (from ~2.8 MeV to 1.4 MeV), while the relative energy spread will increase with the<br />

reduced beam energy (from 0.02% to 0.03%). The very small energy chirp along the electron<br />

bunch can be approximately maintained, even after the L3 rf is switched off.<br />

The beta-match at the undulator entrance, due to its permanent magnet focusing, needs to be<br />

adjusted to produce ~6-meter average undulator beta functions, as opposed to the ~18-meter beta<br />

functions at 1.5 Å (14.3 GeV). The re-match is accomplished using the four QM35-38<br />

quadrupoles at undulator entrance (last four quads at right of Figure 7.36).<br />

Table 7.9 lists the machine parameters for the 15-Å case alongside the nominal 1.5-Å case.<br />

Parameters not listed here are the same in the two configurations. The same injector beam, shown<br />

at top of Figure 7.6, is tracked in 2D through the re-configured <strong>LCLS</strong> accelerator with the L3-<br />

linac rf switched off. The final longitudinal phase space at the undulator entrance, at 4.54 GeV, is<br />

shown in Figure 7.11. The temporal distribution is very flat with a nearly constant 2-kA peak<br />

current.<br />

Table 7.9 Machine parameters for 15-Å SASE radiation with a saturation length of ~60 m juxtaposed<br />

against the nominal 1.5-Å configuration, both with 1-nC of charge. Energy sensitivity is worse<br />

(×3) at left, but also more tolerable (×3) at 15 Å.<br />

Bunch Charge → 15 Å (long λ r) 1.5 Å (nominal) units<br />

Final rms bunch length 45 22 µm<br />

Norm. rms slice emittance 3.0 1.2 µm<br />

Peak current 1.9 3.4 kA<br />

L1 rf phase −35.1 −38.1 deg-S<br />

L2 rf phase −40.6 −42.8 deg-S<br />

R 56 of BC1 −40.0 −35.9 mm<br />

R 56 of BC2 −21.7 −22.5 mm<br />

energy spread in BC1 (rms) 1.59 1.78 %<br />

energy spread in BC2 (rms) 0.72 0.76 %<br />

energy spread in undulator (rms) 0.03 0.02 %<br />

bunch length after BC1 (rms) 200 195 µm<br />

rms gun ∆t 0 → 12% σ z 2.3 4.0 psec<br />

rms gun ∆t 0 → 0.1% ∆E/E 0 0.4 1.4 psec<br />

rms ∆Q/Q 0 → 12% I pk 11 6.0 %<br />

This is just one possible long-wavelength configuration. Many long-wavelength scenarios are<br />

possible including reduced charge, increased peak current, and reduced emittance. This specific<br />

7-26 ♦ A C C E L E R A T O R

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!