28.01.2013 Views

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

LCLS Conceptual Design Report - Stanford Synchrotron Radiation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L C L S C O N C E P T U A L D E S I G N R E P O R T<br />

charge distribution used in these experiments were replaced with one that is uniform, i.e., flattop.<br />

In addition, simulations for more recent photoinjector designs (see for example Section 6.6.<br />

PARMELA Simulations), now predict an emittance significantly less than 1 µm.<br />

εn,x (µm)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

3-2001<br />

8560A81<br />

SLAC<br />

Thermionic Injectors<br />

with Sub-harmonic Bunchers<br />

BOEING<br />

BNL<br />

LANL-APEX<br />

Photoinjectors<br />

LANL-AFEL<br />

BNL/UCLA/SLAC<br />

1980 1985 1990<br />

Year<br />

1995 2000<br />

Figure 6.6 Normalized rms transverse emittance measured by the leading thermoionic (SLAC,<br />

BOEING) and rf photocathode injectors [16]. All data are for bunched beams with<br />

approximately 1 nC of charge.<br />

In the 1-nC regime, the lowest reported projected, normalized, rms emittance for an S-band<br />

gun is 2.4 µm measured at BNL [3] using a two-screen emittance measurement technique with<br />

0.9 nC of charge. The emittance was measured using an approximately flat top transverse laser<br />

(clipped Gaussian) distribution and a 15-ps FWHM approximately Gaussian temporal<br />

distribution. However, the electron beam bunch length downstream of the booster accelerator was<br />

closer to 4 ps FWHM, which was attributed to rf compression in the gun. The beam was also<br />

measured using a quadrupole scan technique, which resulted in an emittance of 3.2 µm with 0.8<br />

nC of charge. The different results in the two measurement techniques were attributed to<br />

background subtraction errors in the quadrupole scan technique. A constant background obtained<br />

with a closed iris was used for background subtraction, while the real background varied with the<br />

electron beam image size due to image intensity changes during the quad scan. Since the beam<br />

size and, therefore, the intensity did not change during the two-screen measurement, the error is<br />

assumed to be less.<br />

Temporal slice emittance measurements were also achieved on the same machine with<br />

roughly 1-ps resolution. By phasing the last booster accelerator section, a linear energy chirp<br />

(energy vs. time) on the beam was created and then spatially filtered in a dispersive section<br />

allowing only a narrow time slice through the slit. The resolution was limited by the minimum<br />

achievable electron beam size primarily due to the intrinsic uncorrelated energy spread in the<br />

beam and the jitter in the rf system. A two-screen emittance measurement setup was located<br />

6-11 ♦ I NJECTOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!