From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 1 <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>National</strong> Approaches <strong>to</strong> Internal Displacement: Findings from 15 Countries<br />
reporting on IDP issues since at least 2004, as evidenced<br />
by its 2004 report <strong>to</strong> Parliament (the earliest such report<br />
available on the office’s website), which included a chapter<br />
on IDPs and refugees. 26 Since then, the office has<br />
continued <strong>to</strong> report on IDP issues; in fact, it has intensified<br />
its efforts in recent years, including by submitting<br />
<strong>to</strong> Parliament in 2010 a special report devoted entirely<br />
<strong>to</strong> internal displacement. 27 Yet, as the public defender<br />
himself has pointed out, the office’s efforts <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r<br />
and report on internal displacement have been limited<br />
nonetheless by the number and diversity of IDPs and<br />
the limited capacity of the office. 28<br />
Strengthening the capacity of the Office of the Public<br />
Defender <strong>to</strong> address issues related <strong>to</strong> internal displacement<br />
was the specific aim of a 2010 project entitled<br />
Support <strong>to</strong> Public Defender’s (Ombudsman’s) Office<br />
in Solving the Problems Related <strong>to</strong> IDPs and Persons<br />
Affected by Conflict, which was funded by the Council<br />
of Europe’s High Commissioner for Human Rights. Six<br />
new staff members were hired, including five moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
stationed in regional offices. Following training on<br />
the Guiding Principles and IDP issues provided by the<br />
Council of Europe <strong>to</strong>gether with UNHCR and other<br />
partners, the moni<strong>to</strong>rs began <strong>to</strong> conduct regular visits<br />
<strong>to</strong> IDP collective centers and other IDP settlements,<br />
undertaking a survey of 10 percent of IDP households<br />
in the collective settlements. They also began <strong>to</strong> provide<br />
on-site legal consultations and, in cooperation with the<br />
regional offices of the Ministry of Internally Displaced<br />
Persons from the Occupied Terri<strong>to</strong>ries, Accommodation<br />
and Refugees (previously known as the Ministry of<br />
Refugees and Accommodation), <strong>to</strong> work <strong>to</strong> resolve specific<br />
problems and rights issues identified. The Office<br />
26 Public Defender of Georgia, Report on Conditions of Human<br />
Rights in Georgia in 2004, pp. 66–73 (www.ombudsman.<br />
ge/files/downloads/en/szounjmrncjpwcvdgasn.pdf).<br />
27 For a summary of how and the extent <strong>to</strong> which IDP<br />
issues have been addressed in the reports of the Public<br />
Defender’s Office, see the Georgia case study in chapter 2<br />
of this volume.<br />
28 Public Defender of Georgia, The Situation of Human<br />
Rights and Freedoms in Georgia: Second Half of 2009, p.<br />
174 (www.ombudsman.ge).<br />
104<br />
of the Public Defender prepared a special report on the<br />
human rights of IDPs based on data provided by moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
from January <strong>to</strong> June 2010 and an analysis of existing<br />
national legislation, policies and programs, in which<br />
it made a number of recommendations for improving<br />
the national response. 29 In reports addressing IDP<br />
issues, the Public Defender typically makes reference <strong>to</strong><br />
the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. 30<br />
The Office of the Public Defender also has become<br />
increasingly active, especially since the second half of<br />
2010, in advocating for IDP rights. It has issued several<br />
public statements and press releases specifically on IDP<br />
issues, in particular concerning the process for privatizing<br />
and rehabilitating collective centers and related<br />
concerns about the eviction of IDPs. 31 The office’s IDP<br />
project team also has undertaken a survey on the situation<br />
of IDPs in private accommodations, thereby helping<br />
<strong>to</strong> address an important gap in data collection. 32<br />
As of January 2011, the IDP project in the Office of<br />
the Public Defender was co-funded by the Council of<br />
Europe, <strong>to</strong>gether with UNHCR. 33 The IDP project team<br />
thus relies, at present, entirely on extra-budgetary funds<br />
29 Public Defender of Georgia, Report on the Human Rights<br />
Situation of Internally Displaced Persons and Conflict-<br />
Affected Individuals in Georgia (September 2010),<br />
pp. 5–7 (www.ombudsman.ge/files/downloads/en/<br />
njyyccudreysvwktqszj.pdf).<br />
30 See, for example, See, for example, Public Defender<br />
of Georgia, Human Rights in Georgia: Report of the<br />
Public Defender of Georgia: Second Half of 2006, 2007,<br />
p. 149; Public Defender of Georgia, Report of the Public<br />
Defender of Georgia: The Situation of Human Rights and<br />
Freedoms in Georgia: Second Half of 2009, 2010, p. 177;<br />
both available at Public Defender of Georgia, “Reports,”<br />
(www.ombudsman.ge/index.php?page=21&lang=1); and<br />
Public Defender of Georgia, Report on the Human Rights<br />
Situation of Internally Displaced Persons and Conflict-<br />
Affected Individuals in Georgia..<br />
31 See, for example, “Statement of Public Defender of Georgia<br />
Regarding Eviction of Internally Displaced Persons,” 17<br />
August 2010; and “Statement of the Public Defender,” 21<br />
January 2011 (www.ombudsman.ge).<br />
32 See also the Georgia case study in chapter 2 of this volume.<br />
33 Ibid.