From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Benchmark 9<br />
Facilitate IDPs’ Participation<br />
in Decisionmaking<br />
(a) Do the national authorities encourage<br />
and facilitate the participation of IDPs<br />
in the planning and implementation of<br />
policies and programs for addressing<br />
internal displacement?<br />
IDPs have the right <strong>to</strong> have a say in the decisions affecting<br />
their lives. As affirmed in the Guiding Principles<br />
on Internal Displacement, authorities in fact have a responsibility<br />
<strong>to</strong> facilitate the participation of IDPs in the<br />
planning and implementation of policies and programs<br />
concerning internal displacement. That responsibility<br />
pertains <strong>to</strong> all phases of displacement and <strong>to</strong> different<br />
elements during each phase.<br />
Principle 3(1) affirms that IDPs have the right <strong>to</strong> request<br />
and <strong>to</strong> receive protection and humanitarian assistance<br />
from the national authorities and that they shall not<br />
be persecuted or punished for making such a request.<br />
Principle 7 specifies that outside of the emergency states<br />
of armed conflict or disaster, any decision requiring<br />
displacement must meet several guarantees in order <strong>to</strong><br />
comply with international law, including that the displaced<br />
have access <strong>to</strong> full information on the reasons<br />
and procedures for their displacement and, when applicable,<br />
on compensation and relocation programs; that<br />
free and informed consent is sought of the persons <strong>to</strong> be<br />
displaced; and that the authorities endeavor <strong>to</strong> involve<br />
affected persons, particularly women, in the planning<br />
and management of their relocation. Principle 22 affirms<br />
that during displacement, regardless of the cause<br />
of displacement, no IDPs shall be discriminated against<br />
as a result of their displacement in the enjoyment of<br />
their rights, including the right <strong>to</strong> freedom of thought,<br />
conscience, belief, opinion and expression; the right <strong>to</strong><br />
associate freely and <strong>to</strong> participate equally in community<br />
affairs; the right <strong>to</strong> vote and <strong>to</strong> participate in government<br />
and public affairs; and the right <strong>to</strong> communicate<br />
in a language that they understand. Principle 28(2)<br />
Benchmark 9 Facilitate IDPs’ Participation in Decisionmaking<br />
113<br />
affirms that authorities are expected <strong>to</strong> make “special<br />
efforts” <strong>to</strong> ensure the full participation of IDPs in the<br />
planning and management of their return or resettlement<br />
(including the option of local integration) and<br />
reintegration. Moreover, Principle 29 affirms that upon<br />
their return, resettlement or local integration, IDPs have<br />
the right <strong>to</strong> participate fully and equally in public affairs<br />
at all levels.<br />
While the Guiding Principles emphasize that IDPs, like<br />
all persons, have the right <strong>to</strong> advocate for and participate<br />
in and thereby shape decisions affecting their lives, it is<br />
a right that is all <strong>to</strong>o easy <strong>to</strong> affirm in laws, policies and<br />
public statements but that is seldom implemented in a<br />
meaningful way. In fact, establishing effective mechanisms<br />
<strong>to</strong> encourage and enable substantive participation<br />
of IDPs in decisionmaking is not easy as a previous<br />
study by the <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal<br />
Displacement found. 1 For example, it can be difficult<br />
<strong>to</strong> identify genuine representatives of IDP communities,<br />
<strong>to</strong> ensure that women’s voices are heard, <strong>to</strong> manage expectations<br />
about consultation and participation, and <strong>to</strong><br />
ensure that the safety of IDPs is not jeopardized by their<br />
participation in consultative mechanisms.<br />
Moreover, the terms “consultation” and “participation”<br />
tend <strong>to</strong> be used interchangeably, yet there are important<br />
differences. Broadly defined, “consultation” is the process<br />
of soliciting and listening <strong>to</strong> people’s opinions and<br />
perceptions. “Participation” refers <strong>to</strong> deeper engagement<br />
that may imply a degree of control over decisionmaking<br />
and/or the contribution of labor, skills or material<br />
inputs. Consultation and participation are part of a<br />
process through which stakeholders influence and share<br />
control over initiatives and decisions that affect them.<br />
1 <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal Displacement, Moving<br />
beyond Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric: Consultation and Participation with<br />
Populations Displaced by Conflict or Natural Disasters,<br />
Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2008 (www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/10_<br />
internal_displacement.aspx); <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project<br />
on Internal Displacement, Consulting IDPs: Moving<br />
Beyond Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric, summary report of conference held<br />
15–16 November 2007 in Geneva, February 2008 (www.<br />
brookings.edu/papers/2008/02_displacement.aspx).