10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion<br />

Benchmark 2 Raise <strong>National</strong> Awareness of the Problem of Displacement<br />

When displacement occurs, a government’s public acknowledgment<br />

of its existence and of the government’s<br />

responsibility <strong>to</strong> address it is an important first step in<br />

protecting and assisting IDPs. In comparison with the<br />

eleven other benchmarks, raising awareness of IDPs appears<br />

<strong>to</strong> be a relatively easy measure <strong>to</strong> take. Even so, it<br />

is a step that not all of the countries surveyed have managed<br />

<strong>to</strong> take, at least not in response <strong>to</strong> conflict-induced<br />

displacement. The case of Myanmar illustrates how a<br />

government’s refusal <strong>to</strong> acknowledge displacement, in<br />

this case of conflict-induced IDPs, ensures that for any<br />

such ignored group of IDPs, government action on all of<br />

the other benchmarks also is a non-starter.<br />

In cases in which internal displacement was acknowledged,<br />

whether or not the government admitted responsibility<br />

for causing it, government efforts <strong>to</strong> raise<br />

awareness of internal displacement through public<br />

statements was not always a useful indica<strong>to</strong>r of the government’s<br />

commitment <strong>to</strong> upholding the basic human<br />

rights of IDPs, as in the cases of Pakistan and Sri Lanka.<br />

Across the countries surveyed, governments at different<br />

times and in very different situations have tried <strong>to</strong><br />

raise awareness of internal displacement within their<br />

41<br />

countries. Sometimes their efforts have been belated,<br />

getting off the ground only several years after displacement<br />

first occurred or only as a response <strong>to</strong> political<br />

developments or external pressure; sometimes efforts<br />

have been sporadic, with government engagement<br />

ebbing and flowing over the years. In cases such as<br />

Colombia, Kenya, Turkey, Yemen and others, the influence<br />

of the Representative of the UN Secretary-General<br />

on Internally Displaced Persons on national authorities<br />

seeking <strong>to</strong> address internal displacement through policies<br />

cannot be underestimated.<br />

While there is always a risk in raising expectations with<br />

promises that may not be kept, acknowledgment of the<br />

problem of internal displacement by a high-level government<br />

official is an essential first step <strong>to</strong> addressing<br />

it. Moreover, by raising awareness that IDPs have rights<br />

that must be respected, governments can send a strong<br />

message recognizing their national responsibility <strong>to</strong><br />

IDPs <strong>to</strong> IDPs themselves, communities and government<br />

officials at all levels; that, in turn, can help <strong>to</strong> trigger<br />

more concrete measures <strong>to</strong> address internal displacement.<br />

But governments have different motivations and<br />

levels of sincerity in acknowledging internal displacement,<br />

if they do, which are reflected in their subsequent<br />

actions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!