From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusion<br />
Benchmark 2 Raise <strong>National</strong> Awareness of the Problem of Displacement<br />
When displacement occurs, a government’s public acknowledgment<br />
of its existence and of the government’s<br />
responsibility <strong>to</strong> address it is an important first step in<br />
protecting and assisting IDPs. In comparison with the<br />
eleven other benchmarks, raising awareness of IDPs appears<br />
<strong>to</strong> be a relatively easy measure <strong>to</strong> take. Even so, it<br />
is a step that not all of the countries surveyed have managed<br />
<strong>to</strong> take, at least not in response <strong>to</strong> conflict-induced<br />
displacement. The case of Myanmar illustrates how a<br />
government’s refusal <strong>to</strong> acknowledge displacement, in<br />
this case of conflict-induced IDPs, ensures that for any<br />
such ignored group of IDPs, government action on all of<br />
the other benchmarks also is a non-starter.<br />
In cases in which internal displacement was acknowledged,<br />
whether or not the government admitted responsibility<br />
for causing it, government efforts <strong>to</strong> raise<br />
awareness of internal displacement through public<br />
statements was not always a useful indica<strong>to</strong>r of the government’s<br />
commitment <strong>to</strong> upholding the basic human<br />
rights of IDPs, as in the cases of Pakistan and Sri Lanka.<br />
Across the countries surveyed, governments at different<br />
times and in very different situations have tried <strong>to</strong><br />
raise awareness of internal displacement within their<br />
41<br />
countries. Sometimes their efforts have been belated,<br />
getting off the ground only several years after displacement<br />
first occurred or only as a response <strong>to</strong> political<br />
developments or external pressure; sometimes efforts<br />
have been sporadic, with government engagement<br />
ebbing and flowing over the years. In cases such as<br />
Colombia, Kenya, Turkey, Yemen and others, the influence<br />
of the Representative of the UN Secretary-General<br />
on Internally Displaced Persons on national authorities<br />
seeking <strong>to</strong> address internal displacement through policies<br />
cannot be underestimated.<br />
While there is always a risk in raising expectations with<br />
promises that may not be kept, acknowledgment of the<br />
problem of internal displacement by a high-level government<br />
official is an essential first step <strong>to</strong> addressing<br />
it. Moreover, by raising awareness that IDPs have rights<br />
that must be respected, governments can send a strong<br />
message recognizing their national responsibility <strong>to</strong><br />
IDPs <strong>to</strong> IDPs themselves, communities and government<br />
officials at all levels; that, in turn, can help <strong>to</strong> trigger<br />
more concrete measures <strong>to</strong> address internal displacement.<br />
But governments have different motivations and<br />
levels of sincerity in acknowledging internal displacement,<br />
if they do, which are reflected in their subsequent<br />
actions.