10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Georgia <strong>From</strong> Solidarity <strong>to</strong> Solutions: The Government <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Internal Displacement in Georgia<br />

the training on disaster preparedness addressed<br />

specific issues regarding displacement is unclear.<br />

Training of Central Election Commission officials at the<br />

central, district and precinct level as well as MRA staff<br />

on IDP voting rights and procedures was recommended<br />

following the legislative amendments <strong>to</strong> the Elec<strong>to</strong>ral<br />

Code <strong>to</strong> enable IDPs <strong>to</strong> fully exercise their right <strong>to</strong> vote 70<br />

(see Benchmark 9b); information was not available on<br />

whether training has occurred.<br />

5. Ensure a Legal Framework<br />

for Upholding IDPs’ Rights<br />

Does national legislation address the<br />

specific needs arising in situations of<br />

internal displacement and support IDPs<br />

<strong>to</strong> realize their rights?<br />

Since 1992—and therefore shortly after internal displacement<br />

first occurred in Georgia—the government<br />

has issued more than 200 normative acts with provisions<br />

directly relevant <strong>to</strong> internal displacement. These<br />

include normative acts for which the scope of application<br />

is limited <strong>to</strong> IDPs as well as acts that have a general<br />

scope of application but have specific relevance <strong>to</strong> the<br />

situation of IDPs. 71<br />

In the first category of IDP-specific legislation, the most<br />

notable example is that Georgia counts among the first<br />

countries in the world <strong>to</strong> have enacted a specific law <strong>to</strong><br />

address internal displacement. The Law of Georgia on<br />

Forcibly Displaced Persons—Persecuted Persons was<br />

adopted on 28 June 1996, and it has been amended on<br />

a number of occasions, most recently on 25 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber<br />

2010. As stated in its preamble, the law “determines the<br />

70 Erin Mooney and Balkees Jarrah, The Voting Rights of<br />

Internally Displaced Persons: The OSCE Region (<strong>Brookings</strong><br />

Institution–Johns Hopkins SAIS Project on Internal<br />

Displacement, November, 2004), p. 41.<br />

71 UNHCR, Gap Analysis, 2009, p. 8. For a detailed analysis of<br />

the plethora of normative acts adopted from 1992 through<br />

<strong>to</strong> the end of 2001, see Chkeidze and Korkelia, “Report on<br />

the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and the<br />

Law of Georgia.”<br />

193<br />

legal status of IDPs, grounds and rules for recognition as<br />

an IDP, granting, suspension, termination and deprivation<br />

of IDP status, legal, economic and social guarantees<br />

as well as IDPs’ rights and obligations.” 72<br />

Whereas the definition of “internally displaced persons”<br />

elaborated in the Guiding Principles on Internal<br />

Displacement is simply a descriptive definition, under<br />

Georgian legislation the definition of “IDP” or, more<br />

specifically of “forcibly displaced persons–persecuted<br />

persons” confers a specific legal status. According <strong>to</strong><br />

Article 1 of the law, a “forcibly displaced person–persecuted<br />

person” (also commonly referred <strong>to</strong> as an “IDP” 73 )<br />

is a citizen of Georgia or stateless person permanently<br />

residing in Georgia who was forced<br />

<strong>to</strong> leave their place of habitual residence and<br />

became displaced within the terri<strong>to</strong>ry of<br />

Georgia due <strong>to</strong> the threat <strong>to</strong> her/his life, health<br />

or freedom or <strong>to</strong> the life, health and freedom<br />

of her/his family members, as a result of aggression<br />

of a foreign power, internal conflict or<br />

mass violation of human rights.<br />

There is no other national legislation that defines other<br />

categories of IDPs. <strong>National</strong> legislation in Georgia<br />

therefore defines IDPs more narrowly than in the<br />

Guiding Principles by excluding IDPs who were forced<br />

<strong>to</strong> flee their homes or places of habitual residence due<br />

<strong>to</strong> causes other than those mentioned, including natural<br />

disasters. However, it should be noted that although<br />

persons internally displaced by disasters in Georgia are<br />

not formally recognized as IDPs and given IDP status,<br />

the government does recognize and act upon its respon-<br />

72 Government of Georgia, Law on Forcibly Displaced<br />

Persons–Persecuted Persons.<br />

73 This term is commonly unders<strong>to</strong>od, both in translation<br />

as well as in state and international practice in Georgia, <strong>to</strong><br />

mean “IDP.” Indeed, this is confirmed in the Government<br />

of Georgia, Decree No. 47 of 2 February 2007, “Approving<br />

of the State Strategy for Internally Displaced Persons–<br />

Persecuted Persons.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!