10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Benchmark 12 Cooperation with International and Regional Organizations<br />

Darfur. 28 Immediately after the warrant was issued, the<br />

Sudanese government revoked the operating licenses<br />

of thirteen INGOs and disbanded three national NGOs<br />

in Darfur, 29 accusing them of spying for the court and<br />

passing on information about crimes committed in<br />

Darfur. 30 Some 40 percent of the <strong>to</strong>tal aid workers in<br />

northern Sudan—which had managed over half of the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal humanitarian aid delivered <strong>to</strong> northern Sudan,<br />

including the eastern states and the Three Areas—were<br />

directly affected by the expulsions. 31 The expulsion<br />

threatened <strong>to</strong> severely obstruct the delivery of health<br />

services <strong>to</strong> 1.5 million people, water and sanitation <strong>to</strong><br />

1.16 million and food aid <strong>to</strong> 1.1 million people—many<br />

of them IDPs. In June 2009, three of the expelled<br />

NGOs—CARE, Mercy Corps, Save the Children<br />

and the expelled development firm, Planning and<br />

Development Collaborative International (PADCO)<br />

resumed operations in Darfur by registering under<br />

different names and logos. The announcement by UN<br />

Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs<br />

and Emergency Relief Coordina<strong>to</strong>r John Holmes that<br />

the NGOs had been allowed <strong>to</strong> “return” <strong>to</strong> Darfur<br />

sparked a sharply negative response from the Sudanese<br />

government, which asserted that Sudan was hosting<br />

new NGOs with new names and logos, not allowing<br />

the expelled organizations <strong>to</strong> return. 32 Since then there<br />

28 “Darfur One Year after NGOs Expelled,” Radio Netherlands<br />

Worldwide, 4 March 2010 (www.rnw.nl/internationaljustice/article/darfur-one<br />

-year-after-ngos-expelled).<br />

29 UN Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on<br />

the Sudan, S/2009/211, 17 April 2009, para. 50.<br />

30 “Sudan Expels NGOs, Defies Hague Court,” Mail and<br />

Guardian, 5 March 2009 (www.mg.co.za/article/2009-03-<br />

05-sudan-expels-ngos-defies-hague-court); “Darfur One<br />

Year after NGOs Expelled,” Radio Netherlands Worldwide.<br />

31 Humanitarian Policy Group, ALNAP, “Where <strong>to</strong> Now?<br />

Agency Expulsions in Sudan: Consequences and<br />

Next Steps,” 26 March 2009 (www.odi.org.uk); IRIN,<br />

“Sudan: Expulsions Leave Gaps in Three Areas, Eastern<br />

Region,” 31 March 2009 (www.irinnews.org/Report.<br />

aspx?ReportId=83708).<br />

32 BBC, “Sudan ‘Allows Aid Agencies Back,’” 12 June<br />

2009 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8096214.stm);<br />

Michael Kleinman, “Tough Choices for Agencies Expelled<br />

from Darfur,” Humanitarian Practice Network, Overseas<br />

Development Initiative, 6 May 2009 (www.odihpn.org/<br />

173<br />

have been spikes in attacks on humanitarian workers<br />

in Darfur. Darfur has been a dangerous operating environment<br />

not only for humanitarian ac<strong>to</strong>rs, but also<br />

for other UN personnel. As of June 2011, ninety UN–<br />

African Union Mission in Darfur personnel had been<br />

killed since the mission began in 2008. 33<br />

While his<strong>to</strong>rically the government of Yemen has blocked<br />

access <strong>to</strong> displaced populations and impeded the work of<br />

humanitarian organizations during the conflict, following<br />

the February 2010 cease-fire agreement for the north<br />

of the country, it began <strong>to</strong> permit international agencies<br />

more access <strong>to</strong> facilitate the delivery of aid, albeit with<br />

limitations. The government reportedly was worried<br />

that aid would fall in<strong>to</strong> rebel hands. 34 Aid agencies granted<br />

access <strong>to</strong> conflict-affected regions have faced significant<br />

insecurity, which has consistently undermined<br />

and at times required them <strong>to</strong> suspend their activities. 35<br />

Renewed armed conflict in late 2010 rendered humanitarian<br />

access very challenging, with UN reporting severe<br />

access restrictions in the governorates of Sa’ada and Al<br />

Jawf in the north, particularly for international staff. 36<br />

Ongoing hostilities and access restrictions, in addition<br />

<strong>to</strong> attacks on international NGO personnel and assets,<br />

were also reported in 2011 in the northern governorates<br />

report.asp?id=2998); VOA News, “Sudan Denies Some<br />

Expelled NGOs Returning,” 11 June 2009 (www1.voanews.<br />

com/english/news/a-13-2009-06-11-voa52-68802962.<br />

html); ENews, “Sudan Denies Expelled Aid Groups<br />

Allowed <strong>to</strong> Return,” 14 June 2009 (www.enews.ma/sudandenies_i133254_1.html).<br />

33 UN African Union Mission in Darfur, “UNAMID Facts<br />

and Figures” (www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/<br />

unamid/facts.shtml).<br />

34 Human Rights Watch, “All Quiet on the Northern Front?”<br />

March 2010, p. 51 (www.hrw.org/en/reports/2010/04/07/<br />

all-quiet-northern-front-0).<br />

35 IDMC, Yemen: Constrained <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Protection Needs<br />

of IDPs and Returnees, July 2009, p. 113 (www.internaldisplacement.org).<br />

36 See, for example, OCHA, Yemen: 2011 Humanitarian<br />

<strong>Response</strong> Plan (http://reliefweb.int).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!