From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Benchmark 8 Support NHRIs <strong>to</strong> Integrate Internal Displacement in<strong>to</strong> Their Work<br />
from donors rather than on funds in the office’s regular<br />
annual budget.<br />
The Kenya <strong>National</strong> Commission on Human Rights<br />
(KNCHR) was established in 2002 through the Kenya<br />
<strong>National</strong> Commission on Human Rights Act, which<br />
became operational in July 2003 when the president appointed<br />
nine commissioners. 34 KNCHR’s mandate is <strong>to</strong><br />
enhance the promotion and protection of human rights.<br />
The commission’s activities are independent of government<br />
direction, although it draws its finances from the<br />
Treasury. 35<br />
The KNCHR focused on the human rights situation of<br />
IDPs before and after the 2007-2008 election violence.<br />
In 2009, the commission recognized IDPs as an important<br />
human rights concern and designated a focal point<br />
and staff dedicated <strong>to</strong> IDP issues. It established regional<br />
offices and a network of field moni<strong>to</strong>rs and is also working<br />
in concert with other organizations concerned with<br />
IDPs. 36 Its activities include moni<strong>to</strong>ring the government’s<br />
response <strong>to</strong> IDPs, investigating cases of human<br />
rights violations, advising government institutions, and<br />
promoting rights awareness among IDPs and government<br />
authorities. 37 It visits IDPs in camps and other settings<br />
as well as at return sites <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r their progress<br />
and <strong>to</strong> determine whether their rights are being respected.<br />
In 2009, the KNCHR released a report showing that<br />
millions of shillings from the Humanitarian Fund meant<br />
for IDPs had been embezzled. 38 Following investigations<br />
34 KNHRC, “Public Accountability Statement for 2006–2008:<br />
Statement of Successes and Challenges” (www.knchr.org/<br />
index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=&task=doc_<br />
download&gid=21).<br />
35 See the case study on Kenya, in chapter 2 of this volume.<br />
36 Interview with a KNCHR commissioner, 26 January 2011.<br />
37 KNCHR, Strategic Plan 2009–2013, launched 28 January<br />
2010 (www.knchr.org/index.php?option=com_<br />
docman&Itemid=&task=doc_download&gid=41).<br />
38 KNCHR, “Outcome of KNCHR Assessment of GOK<br />
Resettlement Program of IDPs and Corruption<br />
Allegations,’ press release, Daily Nation, 2 December<br />
2009;also see South Consulting, December 2009 Status of<br />
Implementation Report, p. 29 (www.kenyadialogue.org).<br />
105<br />
in<strong>to</strong> the Kenya situation by the International Criminal<br />
Court in 2010, the KNCHR advocated for an effective<br />
witness protection program <strong>to</strong> protect witnesses,<br />
some of whom are IDPs. 39 KNCHR plays a large and<br />
important role in protecting and promoting the human<br />
rights of IDPs and holding the government accountable<br />
through its advocacy work. 40<br />
The KNCHR is obligated <strong>to</strong> submit an annual report<br />
<strong>to</strong> the <strong>National</strong> Assembly that includes an “overall assessment<br />
of the performance of the government in the<br />
field of human rights” and of KNCHR’s achievements<br />
and challenges. 41 In its 2009–13 strategic plan, KNCHR<br />
reported that among its main challenges in carrying out<br />
its mandate is limited physical access across the country<br />
and adequate staffing. 42 <strong>From</strong> 2009, it began <strong>to</strong> boost<br />
its internal capacity <strong>to</strong> address internal displacement<br />
through engagement of permanent staff and a network<br />
of field moni<strong>to</strong>rs, and it moved away from ad hoc <strong>to</strong> sustained<br />
activities. IDP issues are now an established part<br />
of the work of the commission. 43 While its initial focus<br />
was on those displaced by the election violence of 2007,<br />
its broader response under the Economic, Social and<br />
Cultural Rights Programme is looking at all the causes<br />
of displacement as articulated in the draft national IDP<br />
policy. 44 The KNCHR was an important ac<strong>to</strong>r in the<br />
development of the government’s draft IDP policy, and<br />
39 Interview with a KNCHR commissioner, 26 January 2011.<br />
40 IDMC, Kenya: No Durable Solutions for Internally Displaced<br />
Yet, December 2008 (www.internal-displacement.org).<br />
41 KNCHR produces two reports, the Status of Human<br />
Rights Report and an accountability report, the Annual<br />
Report of the Commission. Since its inception, the KNCHR<br />
has produced three status of human rights reports and<br />
submitted an annual report <strong>to</strong> the Minister for Justice,<br />
who is supposed <strong>to</strong> present it <strong>to</strong> the <strong>National</strong> Assembly for<br />
debate. No annual report has ever been discussed by the<br />
<strong>National</strong> Assembly. The KNCHR does not know why the<br />
reports have not been discussed, but it has continued <strong>to</strong><br />
submit its reports. Interview with deputy secretary of the<br />
KNCHR, 21 January 2011.<br />
42 KNCHR, Strategic Plan 2009–2013.<br />
43 Interview with human rights officer, KNCHR, 26 January<br />
2011.<br />
44 Ibid.