From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Benchmark 10 Establish the Conditions and Provide the Means for IDPs <strong>to</strong> Secure Durable Solutions<br />
IDPs, including compensation for losses suffered as<br />
a result of displacement, was among the five priority<br />
issues of the peace process (the others were security<br />
arrangements, power sharing, wealth sharing, and justice<br />
and reconciliation). The Doha Process concluded<br />
in July 2011 with a framework agreement between<br />
the government and only the Liberation and Justice<br />
Movement; the agreement cites the Guiding Principles<br />
on Internal Displacement. However, a comprehensive<br />
peace deal will require an agreement among all parties<br />
<strong>to</strong> the conflict, including in particular the Justice and<br />
Equality Movement (JEM) and the Sudan Liberation<br />
Movement–Abdel Wahid armed groups.<br />
Especially in the absence of a comprehensive peace<br />
agreement for Darfur, progress <strong>to</strong>ward achieving durable<br />
solutions <strong>to</strong> displacement inevitably is limited due<br />
<strong>to</strong> continued insecurity and ongoing problems of safe<br />
and unrestricted humanitarian access <strong>to</strong> all conflictaffected<br />
areas and populations. Nonetheless, certain<br />
efforts have been made, especially by affirming the<br />
relevance of key international standards and putting in<br />
place mechanisms <strong>to</strong> ensure that those standards are<br />
observed. In particular, the High-Level Committee for<br />
Darfur, of which the government of Sudan is a member,<br />
agreed <strong>to</strong> a joint verification mechanism for returns in<br />
Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2009, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on<br />
Internal Displacement and Sudan’s <strong>National</strong> Policy on<br />
Internally Displaced Persons. 112 IDP returns in Darfur<br />
are moni<strong>to</strong>red and coordinated by the Humanitarian<br />
112 The High-Level Committee for Darfur was established<br />
in 2008 by the “Joint Communiqué on Facilitation of<br />
Humanitarian Activities in Darfur” in 2008. Its members<br />
are the Government of <strong>National</strong> Unity, the African Union,<br />
UN humanitarian agencies, the League of Arab States, the<br />
European Commission, Russia, the Netherlands, Canada,<br />
the United States, and the United Kingdom. Ministerial<br />
Decree No. 4 of May 2009 strengthened and expanded the<br />
committee. UNMIS, “HLC Joint Press Advisory,” November<br />
2010 (www.unsudanig.org/docs/HLC%20Joint%20<br />
Press%20Advisory%2028%20November%202010.pdf);<br />
Sudanese News Agency, “Sudan: High-Level Committee<br />
on Humanitarian Activities in Darfur Lauds Government<br />
Cooperation,” 21 May 2007 (www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.<br />
nsf/db900sid/SHES-73ER9B?OpenDocument).<br />
149<br />
Aid Commission of the government of Sudan, UN<br />
agencies, the International Organization for Migration,<br />
the United Nations–African Union Mission in Darfur<br />
and NGOs. The mechanism was activated in December<br />
2009. Its work has only underscored the severe lack of<br />
the conditions necessary <strong>to</strong> achieve durable solutions.<br />
In July 2010, reporting on over 100 assessment missions<br />
conducted over five months, the UN Secretary-General<br />
revealed that permanent and durable returns were few<br />
and far between in all three states of Darfur due <strong>to</strong><br />
“rural insecurity and land tenure disputes, crop destruction<br />
and a lack of rule of law and basic services in areas<br />
of origin.” 113 Until those issues are resolved, safety is<br />
ensured, and a voluntary choice is offered of possible<br />
solutions—whether return, local integration or resettlement—it<br />
is difficult <strong>to</strong> envisage meaningful progress in<br />
the search for durable solutions for IDPs and refugees<br />
displaced by the ongoing conflict in Darfur.<br />
In Yemen as elsewhere, the government has promoted<br />
return as the preferred solution for IDPs. In 2009, while<br />
conflict was ongoing, it was reported that IDPs living<br />
in camps had been pressured, either directly or through<br />
the withdrawal of humanitarian assistance, <strong>to</strong> return. 114<br />
Moreover, many IDPs risked secondary displacement<br />
on returning, as they were going back <strong>to</strong> destroyed<br />
homes, communities without services, and often a lack<br />
of security due <strong>to</strong> the absence of government forces and<br />
the presence of land mines and unexploded ordnance. 115<br />
Those conditions also prevented access <strong>to</strong> income-generating<br />
opportunities, pushing many IDPs in<strong>to</strong> trafficking<br />
and child labor. 116<br />
113 UN Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on<br />
the African Union–United Nations Hybrid Operation in<br />
Darfur, S/2010/382, 14 July 2010, para. 39 (www.un.org/<br />
en/peacekeeping/missions/unamid/reports.shtml).<br />
114 IDMC, Yemen: Constrained <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Protection Needs<br />
of IDPs and Returnees, July 2009, p. 110, available at: www.<br />
internal-displacement.org<br />
115 Ibid; Reuters, “Interview-Yemen donors wary as displaced<br />
slowly return north,” 8 June 2010 (http://uk.reuters.com/<br />
article/2010/06/08/idUKLDE65624G).<br />
116 IDMC, Yemen: Constrained <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Protection Needs<br />
of IDPs and Returnees, p. 97.