10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Benchmark 10 Establish the Conditions and Provide the Means for IDPs <strong>to</strong> Secure Durable Solutions<br />

IDPs, including compensation for losses suffered as<br />

a result of displacement, was among the five priority<br />

issues of the peace process (the others were security<br />

arrangements, power sharing, wealth sharing, and justice<br />

and reconciliation). The Doha Process concluded<br />

in July 2011 with a framework agreement between<br />

the government and only the Liberation and Justice<br />

Movement; the agreement cites the Guiding Principles<br />

on Internal Displacement. However, a comprehensive<br />

peace deal will require an agreement among all parties<br />

<strong>to</strong> the conflict, including in particular the Justice and<br />

Equality Movement (JEM) and the Sudan Liberation<br />

Movement–Abdel Wahid armed groups.<br />

Especially in the absence of a comprehensive peace<br />

agreement for Darfur, progress <strong>to</strong>ward achieving durable<br />

solutions <strong>to</strong> displacement inevitably is limited due<br />

<strong>to</strong> continued insecurity and ongoing problems of safe<br />

and unrestricted humanitarian access <strong>to</strong> all conflictaffected<br />

areas and populations. Nonetheless, certain<br />

efforts have been made, especially by affirming the<br />

relevance of key international standards and putting in<br />

place mechanisms <strong>to</strong> ensure that those standards are<br />

observed. In particular, the High-Level Committee for<br />

Darfur, of which the government of Sudan is a member,<br />

agreed <strong>to</strong> a joint verification mechanism for returns in<br />

Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2009, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on<br />

Internal Displacement and Sudan’s <strong>National</strong> Policy on<br />

Internally Displaced Persons. 112 IDP returns in Darfur<br />

are moni<strong>to</strong>red and coordinated by the Humanitarian<br />

112 The High-Level Committee for Darfur was established<br />

in 2008 by the “Joint Communiqué on Facilitation of<br />

Humanitarian Activities in Darfur” in 2008. Its members<br />

are the Government of <strong>National</strong> Unity, the African Union,<br />

UN humanitarian agencies, the League of Arab States, the<br />

European Commission, Russia, the Netherlands, Canada,<br />

the United States, and the United Kingdom. Ministerial<br />

Decree No. 4 of May 2009 strengthened and expanded the<br />

committee. UNMIS, “HLC Joint Press Advisory,” November<br />

2010 (www.unsudanig.org/docs/HLC%20Joint%20<br />

Press%20Advisory%2028%20November%202010.pdf);<br />

Sudanese News Agency, “Sudan: High-Level Committee<br />

on Humanitarian Activities in Darfur Lauds Government<br />

Cooperation,” 21 May 2007 (www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.<br />

nsf/db900sid/SHES-73ER9B?OpenDocument).<br />

149<br />

Aid Commission of the government of Sudan, UN<br />

agencies, the International Organization for Migration,<br />

the United Nations–African Union Mission in Darfur<br />

and NGOs. The mechanism was activated in December<br />

2009. Its work has only underscored the severe lack of<br />

the conditions necessary <strong>to</strong> achieve durable solutions.<br />

In July 2010, reporting on over 100 assessment missions<br />

conducted over five months, the UN Secretary-General<br />

revealed that permanent and durable returns were few<br />

and far between in all three states of Darfur due <strong>to</strong><br />

“rural insecurity and land tenure disputes, crop destruction<br />

and a lack of rule of law and basic services in areas<br />

of origin.” 113 Until those issues are resolved, safety is<br />

ensured, and a voluntary choice is offered of possible<br />

solutions—whether return, local integration or resettlement—it<br />

is difficult <strong>to</strong> envisage meaningful progress in<br />

the search for durable solutions for IDPs and refugees<br />

displaced by the ongoing conflict in Darfur.<br />

In Yemen as elsewhere, the government has promoted<br />

return as the preferred solution for IDPs. In 2009, while<br />

conflict was ongoing, it was reported that IDPs living<br />

in camps had been pressured, either directly or through<br />

the withdrawal of humanitarian assistance, <strong>to</strong> return. 114<br />

Moreover, many IDPs risked secondary displacement<br />

on returning, as they were going back <strong>to</strong> destroyed<br />

homes, communities without services, and often a lack<br />

of security due <strong>to</strong> the absence of government forces and<br />

the presence of land mines and unexploded ordnance. 115<br />

Those conditions also prevented access <strong>to</strong> income-generating<br />

opportunities, pushing many IDPs in<strong>to</strong> trafficking<br />

and child labor. 116<br />

113 UN Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on<br />

the African Union–United Nations Hybrid Operation in<br />

Darfur, S/2010/382, 14 July 2010, para. 39 (www.un.org/<br />

en/peacekeeping/missions/unamid/reports.shtml).<br />

114 IDMC, Yemen: Constrained <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Protection Needs<br />

of IDPs and Returnees, July 2009, p. 110, available at: www.<br />

internal-displacement.org<br />

115 Ibid; Reuters, “Interview-Yemen donors wary as displaced<br />

slowly return north,” 8 June 2010 (http://uk.reuters.com/<br />

article/2010/06/08/idUKLDE65624G).<br />

116 IDMC, Yemen: Constrained <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Protection Needs<br />

of IDPs and Returnees, p. 97.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!