10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Response</strong>: <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>National</strong> Approaches <strong>to</strong> Internal Displacement<br />

national policy on internal displacement drafted by the<br />

government for having “ignored international guidelines<br />

on establishing a framework for national responsibility.” 57<br />

Important <strong>to</strong> note is that the Framework is being applied<br />

<strong>to</strong> and used in all types of internal displacement.<br />

The country examples cited above all relate <strong>to</strong> conflictinduced<br />

displacement. However, the Framework also is<br />

being promoted and used <strong>to</strong> advocate and guide national<br />

responses <strong>to</strong> internal displacement caused by natural<br />

disasters. For example, in the United States of America,<br />

lawyers’ groups have drawn upon the Framework<br />

<strong>to</strong> advocate for the protection of IDPs displaced by<br />

Hurricane Katrina. 58 More generally, UN OCHA<br />

refers UN Resident Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs and Humanitarian<br />

Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the Framework as among the sources of<br />

guidance in situations of natural disaster. 59 In addition,<br />

the World Bank is among those promoting reference <strong>to</strong><br />

the Framework in examining responses <strong>to</strong> displacement<br />

in the context of development. 60<br />

The wide dissemination and use that the Framework<br />

has enjoyed by governments and other ac<strong>to</strong>rs supporting<br />

the promotion of IDP rights protection since its<br />

publication in 2005 is testament <strong>to</strong> the interest in and<br />

57 The Kenya <strong>National</strong> Dialogue and Reconciliation<br />

Moni<strong>to</strong>ring Project, Agenda Item 2: Addressing the<br />

Humanitarian Crisis and Promoting <strong>National</strong> Healing and<br />

Reconciliation, Report on Status of Implementation (January<br />

2009).(www.dialoguekenya.org/docs/Agenda%20<br />

Item%20Two%20chapter.pdf).<br />

58 Hon. Cynthia Diane Stephens and Jerome Reide,<br />

“Katrina & Internally Displaced Persons: More than Mere<br />

Semantics,” Human Rights, Fall 2006, vol. 33, no. 4, p.2-4<br />

(www.americanbar.org/publications/human_rights_<br />

magazine_home/irr_hr_fall06_stephensreide.html).<br />

59 See, for example, “Protection in Disasters,” presentation by<br />

UN OCHA at Resident Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs Regional Workshop<br />

on Humanitarian Coordination, 16-18 June 2008, Panama<br />

City, Panama.<br />

60 Asger Christensen and Niels Harild, Forced Displacement<br />

– The Development Challenge, The World Bank Group,<br />

December 2009, p. 7 (http://siteresources.worldbank.<br />

org/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/Resources/ 244362-<br />

1164107274725/3182370-1164201144397/Forced_<br />

Displacement.pdf).<br />

12<br />

need for guidance on IDP protection and assistance.<br />

Indeed, what is clear from the above examples is that the<br />

Framework is used primarily as an awareness-raising,<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>ring and training <strong>to</strong>ol. Such activities are useful<br />

and can indeed further implementation of a number<br />

of the benchmarks, namely those concerning a state’s<br />

acknowledgment of the occurrence of internal displacement<br />

(Benchmark 2), training of government officials<br />

on IDP issues (Benchmark 4) and moni<strong>to</strong>ring the<br />

government response, for instance, by national human<br />

rights institutions (Benchmark 8).<br />

Methodology<br />

This study seeks <strong>to</strong> use the Framework for <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Responsibility</strong>, in particular its twelve benchmarks,<br />

<strong>to</strong> understand and assess the specific measures that<br />

national authorities have taken or have failed <strong>to</strong> take <strong>to</strong><br />

meet their obligations <strong>to</strong> protect the human rights of<br />

internally displaced persons in fifteen countries.<br />

Country selection<br />

Using this template of benchmarks, in addition <strong>to</strong> indica<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

developed for each benchmark (see below), data<br />

on national responses <strong>to</strong> internal displacement in fifteen<br />

countries was collected and analyzed. The countries<br />

included in the study (see map 1) were selected from<br />

a list of the twenty countries with the largest populations<br />

of IDPs, according <strong>to</strong> global figures on internal<br />

displacement in situations of armed conflict, generalized<br />

violence and human rights violations. Together,<br />

these 15 countries represent around 72 percent of the<br />

world’s 27.5 million IDPs (see figure 1). 61 Nine of the<br />

ten countries with the highest number of IDPs were<br />

included in the study; Somalia was excluded on the<br />

grounds that the Somali government does not exercise<br />

effective control over more than a few square kilometers<br />

61 Percent estimate is according <strong>to</strong> correspondence with<br />

IDMC, based on the best estimates of IDPs displaced by<br />

armed conflict, generalized violence and human rights<br />

violations as of December 2010.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!