10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Response</strong>: <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>National</strong> Approaches <strong>to</strong> Internal Displacement<br />

cies and NGOs. 43 The UN Special Representative of the<br />

Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict has<br />

also drawn on the Framework in setting out the expectations<br />

of government and nonstate ac<strong>to</strong>rs in meeting<br />

their responsibilities <strong>to</strong>ward internally displaced children<br />

in situations of armed conflict. 44<br />

Box 2. IDP situations in which<br />

the Framework has been used<br />

Afghanistan Mexico<br />

Central African Republic The Philippines<br />

Ethiopia Russian Federation<br />

Georgia Sierra Leone<br />

Iraq Sri Lanka<br />

Kenya Uganda<br />

Nepal United States of America<br />

In addition, regional organizations and forums have<br />

discussed and disseminated the Framework at various<br />

levels, perhaps most important, the country level.<br />

Regional Initiatives<br />

In the Americas, a regional conference on internal displacement<br />

attended by governments, local NGOs and<br />

researchers, and international agencies and NGOs, endorsed<br />

the Framework and elaborated upon the twelve<br />

benchmarks <strong>to</strong> specify a <strong>to</strong>tal of sixteen key elements in<br />

all. 45 The Framework also has been formally presented<br />

43 IASC, Handbook for the Protection of Internally Displaced<br />

Persons, 2010 (www.unhcr.org/4c2355229.html).<br />

44 UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-<br />

General for Children and Armed Conflict, “The Rights<br />

and Guarantees of Internally Displaced Children in<br />

Armed Conflict,” Working Paper No. 2, September 2010<br />

(www.un.org/children/conflict/english/index.html).<br />

45 Regional Seminar on Internal Displacement in the<br />

Americas, Mexico City, Mexico, February 18-20, 2004,<br />

<strong>Brookings</strong>-SAIS Project on Internal Displacement, 2004<br />

(www.brookings.edu/idp). For a summary of the how the<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong> Framework was used as the basis<br />

for the Regional Framework for Action adopted, see Erin<br />

Mooney, “Promoting national responsibility for internal<br />

10<br />

<strong>to</strong> and discussed by member states of the Organization<br />

for Security and Cooperation in Europe and, in Africa,<br />

<strong>to</strong> member states of the Southern African Development<br />

Community and of the Economic Community of West<br />

African States. 46 Also in Africa, the Framework was presented<br />

and discussed at the pre-summit <strong>to</strong> the African<br />

Union (AU)’s first ever summit on forced displacement;<br />

the Summit which followed adopted the AU Convention<br />

for the Protection of Internally Displacement (Kampala<br />

Convention), in which national responsibility is a central<br />

theme. Local NGOs have promoted the Framework <strong>to</strong><br />

focus attention and advocacy efforts on national responsibility<br />

for addressing internal displacement in Africa. 47<br />

In the Asia-Pacific region, the Framework has been used<br />

in regional training forums for national human rights<br />

institutions on issues of internal displacement. 48 The<br />

Commonwealth, a cross-regional inter-governmental<br />

organization, including several countries with internal<br />

displacement (e.g. Bangladesh, Cyprus, India, Kenya,<br />

Nigeria, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Uganda and Zimbabwe),<br />

promotes the benchmarks contained in the Framework<br />

as ‘best practices’ for its member states. 49<br />

displacement in the Americas,” Forced Migration Review,<br />

Issue 20 (2004), p. 49.<br />

46 See further: <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal<br />

Displacement, Regional Seminar on Internal Displacement<br />

in the Southern African Development Community (SADC)<br />

Region, 24-26 August 2005, Gaborone, Botswana, February<br />

2006; <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal Displacement,<br />

Regional Conference on Internal Displacement in West<br />

Africa, 26-28 April 2006, Abuja, Nigeria; <strong>Brookings</strong> Project<br />

on Internal Displacement, Regional Workshop on Internal<br />

Displacement in the South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan,<br />

Georgia), 10-12 May 2000, Tbilisi, Georgia—Summary<br />

Report. For reports and related conference materials, see:<br />

www.brookings.edu/projects/idp/contents.aspx<br />

47 Joseph Chilengi, “Appeal for IDPs,” Pambazuka News,<br />

(www.pambazuka.org/en/category/letters/30019/print).<br />

48 See, for example, Roberta Cohen, “<strong>National</strong> Policy and<br />

Legal Development,” (www.asiapacificforum.net/services/<br />

training/regional-workshops/idp/downloads/session-2/<br />

cohen2.pdf)<br />

49 Commonwealth Secretariat, Human Rights Unit, Report<br />

of the Expert Group Meeting on Internal Displacement in<br />

the Commonwealth: Common Themes and Best Practice<br />

Guidelines, 19-21 May 2003 (June 2004).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!