From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 1 <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>National</strong> Approaches <strong>to</strong> Internal Displacement: Findings from 15 Countries<br />
In terms of policy development, Afghanistan 25 was<br />
seemingly more active on the issue of internal displacement<br />
at a national level several years ago than it has been<br />
in recent times. In 2003, the government of Afghanistan<br />
committed itself <strong>to</strong> the Guiding Principles through its<br />
Regional Operational Plan (2003) for the south of the<br />
country, which states that “the UN Guiding Principles<br />
on Internal Displacement are <strong>to</strong> be adhered <strong>to</strong> by the<br />
Afghan State <strong>to</strong> promote and seek permanent solutions<br />
for IDPs.” In 2005, the Consultative Group on Returnees,<br />
Refugees, and IDPs endorsed the <strong>National</strong> IDP Plan<br />
and Policy, which emphasized durable solutions and<br />
affirmed the government’s responsibility <strong>to</strong> address<br />
internal displacement. This group was reportedly the<br />
mechanism that facilitated coordination between the<br />
government and the United Nations as of April 2003.<br />
The <strong>National</strong> IDP Plan and Policy was an initiative of<br />
the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development,<br />
the Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation, and the<br />
Ministry of Frontiers and Tribal Affairs, which was supported<br />
by UNHCR, the UN Development Programme,<br />
the World Food Programme, and the UN Assistance<br />
Mission in Afghanistan. The Consultative Group also<br />
agreed <strong>to</strong> respect the Guiding Principles. However, both<br />
the Regional Operational Plan and the <strong>National</strong> IDP<br />
Plan and Policy are defunct. 26<br />
Within the Afghanistan <strong>National</strong> Development<br />
Strategy, the Afghan government adopted the Refugee<br />
Return and IDP (RRI) Sec<strong>to</strong>r Strategy, thereby committing<br />
itself <strong>to</strong> ensuring durable return and reintegration<br />
for the displaced. Accordingly, the relevant ministries<br />
commit <strong>to</strong> incorporate returnee requirements in<strong>to</strong> their<br />
national development programs. The RRI Strategy was<br />
also affirmed in Kabul at an International Conference<br />
on Return and Reintegration in November 2008.<br />
The government of Sudan adopted the <strong>National</strong> Policy<br />
on Internally Displaced Persons in January 2009, which<br />
refers <strong>to</strong> and generally incorporates the UN Guiding<br />
25 See further, Afghanistan case study in chapter 2 of this<br />
volume.<br />
26 Key informant interview, July 2011.<br />
80<br />
Principles on Internal Displacement. While the policy<br />
focuses in large measure on South Sudan, as follow-up <strong>to</strong><br />
implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement,<br />
it was intended <strong>to</strong> apply <strong>to</strong> all levels of government<br />
throughout the entire country. The national policy recognizes<br />
the civil and political as well as economic, social<br />
and cultural rights of the country’s IDPs. It strives <strong>to</strong> promote<br />
voluntary settlement and reunification of IDP families<br />
and <strong>to</strong> involve affected groups and communities in<br />
planning programs and projects that seek <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong><br />
their needs. By promoting reintegration, the government<br />
seeks <strong>to</strong> establish sustainable peace and development<br />
programs that reduce relief dependency and encourage<br />
self-reliance. 27 Nevertheless, the policy’s implementation<br />
as of 2011 has been largely stalled.<br />
In July 2008, the government of Iraq adopted the<br />
<strong>National</strong> Policy on Displacement, which creates a<br />
framework focused on protection during displacement,<br />
but also includes some elements that could support<br />
durable solutions (for example, with respect <strong>to</strong><br />
property and compensation.) The policy covers those<br />
displaced before 2003—“‘transferred/relocated populations,’<br />
i.e., those who were forced <strong>to</strong> leave their homes<br />
as a result of state policies”—and those displaced after<br />
2003. 28 Notably, the policy defines IDPs in accordance<br />
with the Guiding Principles and states that assistance,<br />
moni<strong>to</strong>ring and pursuit of durable solutions are <strong>to</strong> be<br />
undertaken in accordance with the principles. Included<br />
in the policy are provisions outlining government responsibilities<br />
<strong>to</strong> address displacement. The Ministry of<br />
Displacement and Migration is responsible for coordinating,<br />
moni<strong>to</strong>ring, and overseeing the implementation<br />
of the policy. The role of local authorities, however, is<br />
27 For full text, see <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal<br />
Displacement, “<strong>National</strong> and Regional Laws and Policies<br />
on Internal Displacement: Sudan” (www.brookings.edu/<br />
projects/idp/Laws-and-Policies/sudan.aspx).<br />
28 Sections 2.1.1, 2.1.2; see full text of policy at <strong>Brookings</strong>-<br />
Bern Project on Internal Displacement, “<strong>National</strong> and<br />
Regional Laws and Policies on Internal Displacement:<br />
Iraq” (www.brookings.edu/projects/idp/Laws-and-Policies/<br />
iraq.aspx).