10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Georgia <strong>From</strong> Solidarity <strong>to</strong> Solutions: The Government <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Internal Displacement in Georgia<br />

In Abkhazia in particular, the de fac<strong>to</strong> authorities have<br />

passed numerous laws and acts that impact the rights<br />

of IDPs and especially returnees regarding “citizenship”<br />

and property registration and transfer of ownership. 87<br />

These laws have no force under international law, which<br />

does not recognize them or the de fac<strong>to</strong> authorities.<br />

Even so, as UNHCR points out, the de fac<strong>to</strong> legislation<br />

does create administrative hurdles for IDPs who want<br />

<strong>to</strong> return and has the effect of creating “at the very least<br />

a psychological obstacle <strong>to</strong> IDP return.” 88 In addition,<br />

there have been widespread reports that in the aftermath<br />

of the August 2008 conflict, the de fac<strong>to</strong> authorities in<br />

South Ossetia have imposed requirements (besides preexisting<br />

legislation by which IDPs from Georgia were<br />

classified as “refugees”), such as for notarized translation<br />

of identity cards, for persons <strong>to</strong> cross the administrative<br />

boundary line adjacent <strong>to</strong> Akhalgori. At the<br />

same time, the Georgian Law on Occupied Terri<strong>to</strong>ries<br />

reportedly is invoked by Georgian law enforcement officials<br />

as the legal basis for limiting freedom of movement<br />

<strong>to</strong>ward Akhalgori for both persons and goods (see also<br />

Benchmark 12). 89<br />

6. Develop a <strong>National</strong> Policy<br />

on Internal Displacement<br />

Has the national government adopted a<br />

policy or plan of action <strong>to</strong> address internal<br />

displacement?<br />

That the government should adopt a national policy for<br />

addressing internal displacement in accordance with the<br />

Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement first was<br />

87 For a summary, see for instance, UN Commission<br />

on Human Rights, Report of the Representative of the<br />

Secretary-General on the Human Rights of Internally<br />

Displaced Persons, Walter Kälin—Mission <strong>to</strong> Georgia (21 <strong>to</strong><br />

24 December 2005), 24 March 2006, paras. 20, 41 and 48.<br />

88 UNHCR, Gap Analysis, Section 2.2.1, p. 13.<br />

89 Council of Europe, Report on Human Rights Issues<br />

Following the August 2008 Armed Conflict in Georgia, by<br />

Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights,<br />

Strasbourg (7 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010), CommDH(2010)40, para.<br />

11.<br />

197<br />

recommended <strong>to</strong> the government in 2000, during the<br />

mission <strong>to</strong> Georgia by Francis Deng, Representative of<br />

the Secretary-General on the Human Rights of Internally<br />

Displaced Persons. In particular, the RSG recommended<br />

that the government develop a more comprehensive<br />

approach <strong>to</strong> durable solutions <strong>to</strong> displacement that went<br />

beyond simply emphasizing IDPs’ “right <strong>to</strong> return” <strong>to</strong><br />

also improving the living conditions of IDPs in their<br />

current place of displacement and thereby cease viewing<br />

these goals as mutually exclusive. 90 When Deng’s successor,<br />

Walter Kälin, visited the country in 2005, he was<br />

pleased <strong>to</strong> learn that the government had finally begun<br />

<strong>to</strong> make plans <strong>to</strong> draft a national strategy for IDPs in<br />

line with those recommendations. RSG Kälin strongly<br />

encouraged that initiative and recommended that the<br />

national policy be rights-based and comprehensive,<br />

with the aim of supporting IDPs’ integration in<strong>to</strong> society<br />

and access <strong>to</strong> adequate living arrangements while<br />

maintaining their option <strong>to</strong> return. Kälin also advocated<br />

that the government consult closely with civil society<br />

groups, including IDPs, in the process of designing the<br />

policy, and that UNHCR and the wider international<br />

community assist the government in its efforts. 91<br />

In February 2006, the State Commission for Elaborating<br />

the State Strategy for Internally Displaced Persons<br />

was established. 92 The commission was chaired by<br />

the Minister of the MRA; other members included<br />

the Ministers of Finance; of Justice; of Economic<br />

Development; of Labor, Health and Social Affairs; of<br />

Education and Science; Agriculture; Civil Integration;<br />

and Reforms Coordination; as well as the Deputy<br />

Minister of Foreign Affairs and the chair of the Abkhaz<br />

90 UN Commission on Human Rights, Report of the<br />

Representative of the Secretary-General on Internally<br />

Displaced Persons, Mr. Francis Deng—Addendum: Profiles<br />

in Displacement: Georgia, 2001.para. 130(iii)-(iv).<br />

91 UN Commission on Human Rights, Report of the<br />

Representative of the Secretary-General on the Human<br />

Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, Walter Kälin—<br />

Mission <strong>to</strong> Georgia (21 <strong>to</strong> 24 December 2005), 24 March<br />

2006, paras.18 and 56-57.<br />

92 Government of Georgia, Decree No. 80, 23 February 2006.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!