From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Benchmark 5<br />
Ensure a Legal Framework<br />
for Upholding IDPs’ Rights<br />
Does national legislation address the<br />
specific needs arising in situations of<br />
internal displacement and support IDPs <strong>to</strong><br />
realize their rights?<br />
Experience shows that an effective response <strong>to</strong> displacement<br />
almost always requires legislative action, typically<br />
because current laws pose unintended obstacles<br />
<strong>to</strong> the ability of IDPs <strong>to</strong> realize their rights or because<br />
they do not, on their own, provide a sufficient basis for<br />
addressing the needs of IDPs. Existing laws may unintentionally<br />
discriminate against IDPs. For example,<br />
a requirement that children present their educational<br />
records in order <strong>to</strong> register for school may discriminate<br />
against IDP children who have lost their documents in<br />
the course of displacement or who, because they are displaced,<br />
are unable <strong>to</strong> return home, even temporarily, <strong>to</strong><br />
obtain them. In some cases, such shortcomings can be<br />
addressed through an executive order or policy; in other<br />
cases, legislation may be required.<br />
As the Framework for <strong>National</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong> emphasizes,<br />
there are different ways of addressing internal displacement<br />
and protecting the rights of IDPs through national<br />
legislation. In some instances, governments have adopted<br />
legislation <strong>to</strong> address a specific phase of displacement,<br />
such as return and resettlement; in other cases, governments<br />
have adopted comprehensive laws. In addition, it<br />
is important <strong>to</strong> review and analyze existing national legislation<br />
in terms of its compatibility with international<br />
standards, including the Guiding Principles on Internal<br />
Displacement (the Guiding Principles), and <strong>to</strong> introduce<br />
any amendments required. Protecting Internally Displaced<br />
Persons: A Guide for Law and Policy Makers, developed<br />
by the Representative of the UN Secretary-General on<br />
the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons (RSG<br />
on IDPs) and the <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal<br />
Displacement, recommends that the legal framework for<br />
addressing displacement include at least two elements:<br />
Benchmark 4 Training on the Rights of IDPs<br />
63<br />
—a review and analysis of existing national<br />
legislation <strong>to</strong> identify and change provisions<br />
that are incompatible with international human<br />
rights law and the Guiding Principles;<br />
—national laws regulating the response <strong>to</strong> internal<br />
displacement specifically, including the<br />
prevention of arbitrary displacement. 1<br />
As a former legal adviser <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern project<br />
observed, “the process of developing a comprehensive<br />
law or policy presents an opportunity for all relevant<br />
stakeholders <strong>to</strong> share perspectives on the best practices<br />
for addressing internal displacement.” Such laws should<br />
take in<strong>to</strong> account the particular conditions of displacement,<br />
national legal frameworks and particular vulnerabilities<br />
of the displaced. 2<br />
To date, fourteen countries have developed laws on or<br />
pertaining <strong>to</strong> internal displacement, many of them based<br />
on the Guiding Principles. 3 A few other countries have<br />
drafted legislation on internal displacement (Nigeria<br />
and the Philippines) or are currently drafting legislation<br />
(Central African Republic). These developments reflect<br />
the growing realization that internal displacement must<br />
be addressed at the national level, as a matter of both legal<br />
obligation and national interest. Based on analysis of information<br />
available online and the work of the Office of<br />
the Representative of the UN Secretary-General on the<br />
Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, several of<br />
1 <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal Displacement,<br />
Protecting Internally Displaced Persons: A Manual for Law<br />
and Policymakers, Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2008 (www.brookings.edu/<br />
papers/2008/1016_internal_displacement.aspx).<br />
2 Jessica Wyndham, “A Developing Trend: Laws and Policies<br />
on Internal Displacement,” Human Rights Brief, 2006, p. 8<br />
(www.brookings.edu/articles/2006/winter_humanrights_<br />
wyndham.aspx).<br />
3 Angola, Liberia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Colombia, Peru,<br />
United States, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina,<br />
Georgia, Russia, Turkey, and Iraq. See the <strong>Brookings</strong><br />
Project on Internal Displacement laws and policies<br />
database for a summary and the full text of IDP-related<br />
laws and policies (www.brookings.edu/projects/idp/Lawsand-Policies/idp_policies_index.aspx).