10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Benchmark 5<br />

Ensure a Legal Framework<br />

for Upholding IDPs’ Rights<br />

Does national legislation address the<br />

specific needs arising in situations of<br />

internal displacement and support IDPs <strong>to</strong><br />

realize their rights?<br />

Experience shows that an effective response <strong>to</strong> displacement<br />

almost always requires legislative action, typically<br />

because current laws pose unintended obstacles<br />

<strong>to</strong> the ability of IDPs <strong>to</strong> realize their rights or because<br />

they do not, on their own, provide a sufficient basis for<br />

addressing the needs of IDPs. Existing laws may unintentionally<br />

discriminate against IDPs. For example,<br />

a requirement that children present their educational<br />

records in order <strong>to</strong> register for school may discriminate<br />

against IDP children who have lost their documents in<br />

the course of displacement or who, because they are displaced,<br />

are unable <strong>to</strong> return home, even temporarily, <strong>to</strong><br />

obtain them. In some cases, such shortcomings can be<br />

addressed through an executive order or policy; in other<br />

cases, legislation may be required.<br />

As the Framework for <strong>National</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong> emphasizes,<br />

there are different ways of addressing internal displacement<br />

and protecting the rights of IDPs through national<br />

legislation. In some instances, governments have adopted<br />

legislation <strong>to</strong> address a specific phase of displacement,<br />

such as return and resettlement; in other cases, governments<br />

have adopted comprehensive laws. In addition, it<br />

is important <strong>to</strong> review and analyze existing national legislation<br />

in terms of its compatibility with international<br />

standards, including the Guiding Principles on Internal<br />

Displacement (the Guiding Principles), and <strong>to</strong> introduce<br />

any amendments required. Protecting Internally Displaced<br />

Persons: A Guide for Law and Policy Makers, developed<br />

by the Representative of the UN Secretary-General on<br />

the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons (RSG<br />

on IDPs) and the <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal<br />

Displacement, recommends that the legal framework for<br />

addressing displacement include at least two elements:<br />

Benchmark 4 Training on the Rights of IDPs<br />

63<br />

—a review and analysis of existing national<br />

legislation <strong>to</strong> identify and change provisions<br />

that are incompatible with international human<br />

rights law and the Guiding Principles;<br />

—national laws regulating the response <strong>to</strong> internal<br />

displacement specifically, including the<br />

prevention of arbitrary displacement. 1<br />

As a former legal adviser <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern project<br />

observed, “the process of developing a comprehensive<br />

law or policy presents an opportunity for all relevant<br />

stakeholders <strong>to</strong> share perspectives on the best practices<br />

for addressing internal displacement.” Such laws should<br />

take in<strong>to</strong> account the particular conditions of displacement,<br />

national legal frameworks and particular vulnerabilities<br />

of the displaced. 2<br />

To date, fourteen countries have developed laws on or<br />

pertaining <strong>to</strong> internal displacement, many of them based<br />

on the Guiding Principles. 3 A few other countries have<br />

drafted legislation on internal displacement (Nigeria<br />

and the Philippines) or are currently drafting legislation<br />

(Central African Republic). These developments reflect<br />

the growing realization that internal displacement must<br />

be addressed at the national level, as a matter of both legal<br />

obligation and national interest. Based on analysis of information<br />

available online and the work of the Office of<br />

the Representative of the UN Secretary-General on the<br />

Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, several of<br />

1 <strong>Brookings</strong>-Bern Project on Internal Displacement,<br />

Protecting Internally Displaced Persons: A Manual for Law<br />

and Policymakers, Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2008 (www.brookings.edu/<br />

papers/2008/1016_internal_displacement.aspx).<br />

2 Jessica Wyndham, “A Developing Trend: Laws and Policies<br />

on Internal Displacement,” Human Rights Brief, 2006, p. 8<br />

(www.brookings.edu/articles/2006/winter_humanrights_<br />

wyndham.aspx).<br />

3 Angola, Liberia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Colombia, Peru,<br />

United States, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina,<br />

Georgia, Russia, Turkey, and Iraq. See the <strong>Brookings</strong><br />

Project on Internal Displacement laws and policies<br />

database for a summary and the full text of IDP-related<br />

laws and policies (www.brookings.edu/projects/idp/Lawsand-Policies/idp_policies_index.aspx).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!