06.06.2022 Views

B. P. Lathi, Zhi Ding - Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems-Oxford University Press (2009)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.1 Optimum Linear Detector for Binary Polar Signaling 511

t m = T 0 gives the minimum delay for decision making using a realizable filter. In our future

discussion, we shall assume t m = T 0 , unless otherwise specified.

Observe that both p(t) and h(t) have a width of T 0 seconds. Hence, p 0 (t), which is a

convolution ofp(t) and h(t), has a width of 2T 0 seconds, with its peak occurring at t = T 0 where

the decision sample is taken. Also, because P 0 (f) = P(f)H (f) = k'IP(f) l 2 e-i 2 11:fT 0 , p 0 (t) is

symmetrical about t = T 0 .*

Since the gain k' does not affect the SNR p, we choose k' = 1. This gives the matched

filter under white noise

or equivalently

h(t) = p (T 0 - t) (10.12a)

H (f) = P(-f)e - } 2 11:fTo

(10.12b)

for which the signal to noise ratio is maximum at the decision-making instant t = T 0 •

The matched filter is optimum in the sense that it maximizes the signal-to-noise ratio

at the decision-making instant. Although it is reasonable to assume that maximization of this

particular signal-to-noise ratio will minimize the detection error probability, we have not proven

that the original structure of linear receiver with threshold detection (sample and decide) is the

optimum structure. The optimality of the matched filter receiver under white Gaussian noise

will be shown later (Section 10.6).

Given the matched filter under white Gaussian noise, the matched filter receiver leads to

Pmax of Eq. (10.lla) as well as the minimum BER of

Pe = Q(Pmax) = Q ( ffi-) (10.13)

Equation (10. 13) is quite remarkable. It shows that, as far as the system performance is concerned,

when the matched filter receiver is used, various waveforms used for p(t) are equivalent

as long as they have the same energy

The matched filter may also be implemented by the alternative arrangement shown in

Fig. 10.3. If the input to the matched filter is y(t), then the output r(t) is given by

r(t) = L: y(x)h(t - x) dx

(10.14)

where h(t) = p (T 0 - t) and

h(t - x) = p [T 0 - (t - x)] = p (x + T 0 - t)

(10.15)

* This follows from the fact that because IP(f)l 2 is an even function off, its inverse transform is symmetrical about

t = 0 (see Prob. 3.1-1). The output from the previous input pulse terminates and has a zero value at t = T 0 .

Similarly, the output from the following pulse starts and has a zero value at t = T 0 • Hence, at the decision-making

instant TO, no intersymbol interference occurs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!