06.06.2022 Views

B. P. Lathi, Zhi Ding - Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems-Oxford University Press (2009)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

538 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Figure 1 O. 16

Binary communication

in the

presence of

noise.

er

(a)

(b)

when s1 and sk are widely separated in signal space. In this case, there is virtually no overlap

between the two scattered regions. If either mj or mk is transmitted, the received signal will lie

in one of the two scatter regions. From the position of the received signal, one can decide with

a very small probability of error whether mj or mk was transmitted. In Fig. 10. 16a, the received

signal r is much closer to Sk than to Sj , It is therefore more likely that mk was transmitted.

Note that theoretically each scatter extends to infinity, although the probability of observing

the received signal diminishes rapidly as a point is scattered away from the center. _Hence,

there will always be some overlap between the two scatter sets, resulting in a nonzero error

probability. Thus, even though the received r is much closer to Sk in Fig. 10. 16a, it may still

be generated by Sj plus channel noise.

Figure 10. 16b illustrates the case of stronger noise. In this case, there is a considerable

overlap between the two scattered regions. Because the received signal r is closer to Sj than

to Sk , it is more likely that mj was transmitted. But in this case there is also a considerable

probability that mk may have been transmitted. Hence in this situation, there will be a much

higher probability of error in any decision scheme.

The optimum receiver must decide, from a knowledge of r, which message has been

transmitted. The signal space must be divided into M nonoverlapping, or disjoint, decision

regions R 1 , R2, ..., RM , corresponding to the M messages m 1 , m2, ..., mM. If r falls in the

region R k , the decision is m k . The problem of designing the receiver then reduces to choosing

the boundaries of these decision regions R1 , R2, ..., RM to minimize the probability of error

in decision making.

To recapitulate: A transmitter sends a sequence of messages from a set of M

messages m1 , m2, ..., mM . These messages are represented by finite energy waveforms

s1 (t), s2 (t), ... , SM (t). One waveform is transmitted every T 0 = TM seconds. We assume that

the receiver is time-synchronized with the transmitter. The waveforms are corrupted during

transmissions by an AWGN of PSD N /2. Knowing the received waveform, the receiver must

decide which waveform was transmitted. The merit criterion of the receiver is the minimum

probability of error in making this decision.

10.6.2 Dimensionality of the Detection Signal Space

Let us now discuss the dimensionality of the signal space in our detection problem. If there was

no noise, we would be dealing with only M waveforms s1 (t), s2(t), ... , SM (t). In this case

a signal space of, at most, M dimensions would suffice. This is because the dimensionality

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!