27.07.2013 Views

Last ned - Direktoratet for naturforvaltning

Last ned - Direktoratet for naturforvaltning

Last ned - Direktoratet for naturforvaltning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Klimaendringer, hav<strong>for</strong>suring og langtransportert <strong>for</strong>urensning<br />

fillet generally exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) set by the EU. However, the<br />

pollution levels found at present have not generally been shown to have direct biological effects.<br />

It is concluded that, particularly considering the implications <strong>for</strong> food safety, long-range transport of<br />

hazardous substances currently has moderate effects in the management plan area. In the “positive”<br />

and “negative” scenarios <strong>for</strong> 2030, the effects are assessed as minor and moderate respectively.<br />

Long-range transport of marine litter affects the entire management plan area to a varying degree.<br />

Marine litter has been shown to have a number of biological effects, both externally and internally.<br />

For example, ingested litter may damage the digestive system or block the gut, preventing the<br />

ingestion of food and digestion. There is also concern about the possible effects of microplastic<br />

pollution, although relatively low concentrations were found in a study in the Skagerrak. It is likely<br />

that marine litter harms only a small proportion of many populations, but that a much larger<br />

proportion of certain seabird populations (particularly the northern fulmar) is affected. It is<br />

concluded that marine litter currently has moderate effects, and this result remains unchanged in<br />

both scenarios <strong>for</strong> 2030.<br />

Long-range transport of radioactive substances: in general, both inputs and levels of radioactive<br />

pollution are low in the North Sea and Skagerrak, but higher than in the Norwegian and Barents Seas.<br />

Current levels are well below those that have been shown to have effects on biota. The effects of this<br />

factor are there<strong>for</strong>e assessed as minor at present, and also in both scenarios <strong>for</strong> 2030. However, the<br />

“negative” scenario specifies a higher risk of acute pollution. The effects could be considerably more<br />

serious in the event of an accidental release of radioactivity.<br />

Long-range transport of nutrients and organic material. Concentrations of nutrients are generally low<br />

in the management plan area, but there are elevated concentrations in the Norwegian coastal<br />

current in the Skagerrak. The concentrations found at present probably have only minor effects in<br />

the management plan area. However, the combination of long-range transport and local inputs of<br />

nutrients along the Skagerrak coast may have effects on algal/seaweed communities used as a<br />

habitat by species that are also found in the management plan area. The assessment concludes that<br />

long-range transport of nutrients and organic material has minor effects today. In the “positive” and<br />

“negative” scenarios <strong>for</strong> 2030, the effects are assessed as minor and moderate respectively.<br />

Acute pollution: Scenarios have also been developed <strong>for</strong> a release of radioactivity from the<br />

reprocessing plant at Sellafield and an oil spill from the Preemraff oil refinery in Lysekil in Sweden.<br />

Modelling of the scenario <strong>for</strong> radioactive pollution from Sellafield indicates that there would be no<br />

effects on marine organisms, but that caesium 137 concentrations in fish and other seafood species<br />

in upper layers of the water column might <strong>for</strong> a short period of time exceed current limits.<br />

Assessment of the scenario <strong>for</strong> an oil spill from the Preemraff refinery indicates a high potential <strong>for</strong><br />

transport of oil into the management plan area. It is concluded that an oil spill would have moderate<br />

effects, but the level of uncertainty is high.<br />

Combi<strong>ned</strong> impacts<br />

There may be complex interactions between the different pressures described in this report, which<br />

makes it very difficult to predict the cumulative environmental effects. When a number of pressures<br />

Side 10 av 172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!