12.11.2014 Views

LEDDEGIGT – - Sundhedsstyrelsen

LEDDEGIGT – - Sundhedsstyrelsen

LEDDEGIGT – - Sundhedsstyrelsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

heumatology specialist capacity in Denmark, with the ratio of specialists to<br />

inhabitants ranging from 1:47,000 to 1:13,000. In areas where specialist coverage<br />

is low, rheumatoid arthritis patients are largely dependent on treatment<br />

by general practitioners. The differences in specialist capacity are also reflected<br />

in the waiting time for both inpatient and outpatient treatment.<br />

The general practitioners should offer patients with joint swelling a follow-up<br />

control no later than six weeks after the first examination. If the<br />

joint swelling persists, the patient should be referred to a specialist in<br />

rheumatology on suspicion of rheumatoid arthritis.<br />

Irrespective of what treatment the patient receives, it is important that<br />

the treatment is conducted by multidisciplinary teams so as to ensure<br />

optimal conditions for early diagnosis, treatment, care and rehabilitation.<br />

Patients who are treated in the primary sector should be offered<br />

relevant physiotherapy and occupational therapy, and should be ensured<br />

easy access to evaluation for surgical treatment.<br />

Economic factors<br />

The additional cost to the Counties for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis<br />

patients relative to age-corrected control groups is calculated to be DKK 278<br />

million. This is not an unequivocal estimate of the costs, however, among<br />

other reasons because unequivocal identification of rheumatoid arthritis patients<br />

via registers is not possible. Moreover, a number of important costs<br />

cannot be calculated and incorporated, and the cost estimate must therefore<br />

be considered as a minimum figure.<br />

The TNF-alpha antagonists are presently considerably more expensive than<br />

the traditional anti-rheumatic drugs. Even though the price is expected to fall<br />

in step with the introduction of more biological drugs on the market, their<br />

use will still entail considerable additional costs.<br />

The additional costs of treatment with infliximab and etanercept,<br />

which are usually administered in combination with methotrexate, are<br />

calculated relative to the cost of treatment with methotrexate alone.<br />

With infliximab administered in standard doses the costs amount to an<br />

average of DKK 73,000 per patient the first year. With etanercept the<br />

additional costs amount to DKK 110,300 per patient in the first year<br />

and subsequent years. Concerning infliximab the treatment is dearer the<br />

first year than the following due to the initial more frequent influsions.<br />

The additional cost calculations do not take into account the expected<br />

savings resulting from the less severe course of the disease.<br />

Three possible treatment models<br />

Three theoretical models have been established for future organization of<br />

medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In this connection, treatment<br />

plans have been drawn up and the models have been characterized from the<br />

medical, patient, organizational and economic perspectives.<br />

Model A describes the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis solely by<br />

means of the slowly-acting anti-rheumatic drugs. Referral practice and<br />

diagnosis are assumed to remain unchanged. Model A is intended as<br />

the baseline for comparison with models B and C. The model is no<br />

longer a reality since the use of TNF-alpha antagonists has already been<br />

initiated in Denmark, and they are presently estimated to be administered<br />

to approximately 400 patients (May 2002).<br />

Model B describes a course whereby the new drugs are offered to all newly<br />

diagnosed patients as well as to other patients attended by rheumatologists<br />

in whom the slowly-acting anti-rheumatic drugs are ineffective.<br />

The model entails early referral and diagnosis.<br />

Model C describes a course whereby the new drugs are not generally offered<br />

until the slowly-acting anti-rheumatic drugs have not had an adequate<br />

effect. This model also presumes early referral and diagnosis.<br />

Based on current treatment standards it is expected that of rheumatoid arthritis<br />

patients attended by rheumatologists, the slowly-acting anti-rheumatic<br />

drugs will be ineffective in an estimated 10-20% of those with longstanding<br />

disease and 10% of those who are diagnosed and treated after introduction of<br />

early diagnosis.<br />

Model A: slowly-acting anti-rheumatic drugs<br />

Slowly-acting anti-rheumatic drugs only have an effect while treatment is<br />

maintained, thus necessitating long-term treatment. With most of these<br />

drugs (except methotrexate), few patients remain responsive and can tolerate<br />

the treatment for more than 2 years. This necessitates frequent change of<br />

medication and long periods with insufficient control of the disease due to<br />

the slow onset of action of these anti-rheumatic drugs.<br />

Due to the absence of TNF-alpha antagonists in this model, a group of unresponsive<br />

patients (an estimated 10-20% of the population of rheumatoid<br />

arthritis patients attended by rheumatologists) will not have access to a modern<br />

treatment. Similarly, the treatment benefits of early referral and diagnosis<br />

will be denied these patients. This model entails the lowest costs.<br />

30 <strong>LEDDEGIGT</strong> – medicinsk teknologivurdering af diagnostik og behandling<br />

<strong>LEDDEGIGT</strong> – medicinsk teknologivurdering af diagnostik og behandling 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!