A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
There are now many items <strong>of</strong> photographic and derived data evidence that support Arp’s claim that many<br />
objects, supposedly far away from us, are in fact physically joined to objects that are relatively near to us. This<br />
directly contradicts what standard science has hailed for decades is pro<strong>of</strong> through the analysis <strong>of</strong> redshifted<br />
light, that our universe started in a Big Bang event and that it still continues to expand. It seems that orthodox<br />
astro-science would just not take this convincing and potentially embarrassing evidence on board. In fact, such<br />
was the reaction against Arp’s revelation that he was denied observing time on all major telescopes in the US<br />
and his working life made so miserable that he was forced to leave his job at the Mount Palomar observatory.<br />
In the end, and due to not being able to satisfactorily pursue his work in astronomy in the US, Arp moved to<br />
Germany where he now works at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching.<br />
What Arp had discovered was that many bodies in space, calculated by the application <strong>of</strong> redshift theory to be<br />
both very close and very far away from us, are actually joined together. How could this be if the application <strong>of</strong><br />
redshift for distance calculation was correct to do? Could it really be that the Big Bang event never happened<br />
and all the other stuff about a 13.7 billion year old expanding universe, is wrong? The evidence does indeed<br />
indicate this is the case!<br />
Dr Anthony L Peratt (? – present) [5-8]<br />
Probably today’s leading plasma research scientist, Dr Peratt is well known<br />
in electrical and plasma science circles. He has conducted experiments that<br />
have provided significant pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the behaviour <strong>of</strong> plasma in space and has<br />
shown that it can hold stupendous levels <strong>of</strong> electrical energy.<br />
These levels <strong>of</strong> energy have been calculated as significant enough to account<br />
for the formation <strong>of</strong> galaxies and stars and for deep space phenomena such<br />
as novae, active galaxy cores, quasars and other sources <strong>of</strong> high-intensity<br />
radio, X-ray and gamma ray emissions. He remains a working scientist but<br />
has contributed significantly to aspects <strong>of</strong> EU theory and research. Two <strong>of</strong> his<br />
major achievements have been ... the definition <strong>of</strong> ‘Peratt Instabilities’, which<br />
are now considered fundamental to plasma science, and his interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />
the stone-carved petroglyphs left as records by ancient civilisations in their<br />
attempts to describe the mysterious and frightening events they observed<br />
taking place all around them and in the heavens above their heads. Dr Peratt’s<br />
Anthony L Peratt<br />
work and reputation has brought great credibility to the EU model and to its<br />
community <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional proponents. If it were not for the contributions <strong>of</strong> Peratt and others like him, then<br />
building the powerful case we have for the EU model would have been far more difficult.<br />
0 | The work <strong>of</strong> the honourable but ignored