A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Even further down in relation to the thermonuclear star model, this is where we find the so-called ‘failed stars’<br />
but that term has no relevance in the electric model <strong>of</strong> a star. It is simply the case that these are stars whose<br />
plasmaspheres are not being electrically excited enough to give <strong>of</strong>f a great deal <strong>of</strong> visible light. In our own solar<br />
system today there are bodies that have a relationship with this idea. Jupiter and Saturn both have enormous<br />
invisible electromagnetic bubbles around them, as do all other bodies in the solar system, plus very relevantly<br />
the solar system itself, but these two gas giants are particularly important because <strong>of</strong> their possible histories<br />
about which I will say more later.<br />
Taking Jupiter as the example, the electromagnetic bubble that surrounds it, also referred to as Jupiter's<br />
plasmasphere or magnetosphere, is extremely large and currently not visible because it consists <strong>of</strong> plasma in<br />
dark mode. If the outer surface <strong>of</strong> that plasmasphere, being Jupiter’s electrical barrier to the rest <strong>of</strong> space, were<br />
to receive per unit area a much greater current density than it does at the moment, then it would start to glow<br />
and Jupiter would appear to us here on Earth as if it was a much larger brown/red dwarf star. The diameter <strong>of</strong><br />
Jupiter's plasmasphere is many times its own diameter, and if we could see this in the night sky it would look<br />
similar in size to the full moon. Incidentally, if this were to happen, then all <strong>of</strong> Jupiter’s current moons would<br />
orbit inside this glowing bubble, so anyone standing on one <strong>of</strong> those moons would only see above them a<br />
visually impenetrable purple glow right across the sky; there would be no day or night, no seasons, no stars to<br />
see and the temperature and level <strong>of</strong> illumination would be very constant. (Associated information [6-9a] [6-9b] )<br />
Here is a contradiction that underlines the relevance <strong>of</strong> questioning what we are told about stars. There are<br />
classes known as T and L type dwarf stars. Relative to normal stars, these are very cool indeed with estimated<br />
temperatures <strong>of</strong> between 600 to 1000K. Interestingly, these are temperatures in the same region as areas on<br />
the surface <strong>of</strong> the planet Venus. Temperatures this low indicate that the thermonuclear fusion process cannot<br />
possibly be occurring inside these bodies. Yet X-rays have been detected coming from similarly cool brown<br />
dwarf stars, where again, the low temperatures involved are fundamentally incapable <strong>of</strong> initiating the production<br />
<strong>of</strong> this powerful type <strong>of</strong> radiation. Straightforward evidence like this that indicates things are not right with the<br />
thermonuclear theory <strong>of</strong> stars should be all that is needed to drive a more open and inclusive investigation, but<br />
sadly, it does not.<br />
Mainstream astro-science can talk about size, temperature, colour, radiation emissions and behaviours <strong>of</strong> their<br />
range <strong>of</strong> star types, but it does not matter, for there seems to be an electrical bottom line to what has traditionally<br />
been interpreted as different types <strong>of</strong> star. According to the EU model, all stars started as different combinations<br />
and amounts <strong>of</strong> ionised matter as plasma, being brought together by the EM force then maintained in appearance<br />
as the stars we recognise or as other phenomena by a certain level <strong>of</strong> current density delivered to them from their<br />
environments. The standard list <strong>of</strong> star types is misleading and the thermonuclear star theory is wrong. What we<br />
see in space are fundamentally all the same things; concentrated bodies <strong>of</strong> plasma reacting to different levels <strong>of</strong><br />
electrical energy.<br />
102 | The <strong>Electric</strong> <strong>Universe</strong> answers I see