A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Recommendations

Info

The central peaks often seen inside craters are said to be produced by rebounding molten rock that has instantaneously ‘frozen into place’ after an impact event. Alignment of the strata of central peaks with those in crater walls © author Standard theory claims that the central peaks of craters are formed by the instant solidification of rock that has become molten after a projectile strikes and heats an area on the solid surface of a planet or moon. The event being suggested here can be imagined as something akin to when you drop a stone into water and watch a central column shoot up. Again I share the view of others and cannot believe this is how these central peaks are formed. Instead, it seems logical to believe that a bifilar Birkeland current with its rotating machining action around a crater’s central point could leave behind a single or tight group of protruding cone-shaped features. In support of this it is claimed by some that these peaks have the same vertical sequence of stratification (distribution of layers of material) that the inner wall of its crater has. In any case, a process for central peak formation supports the idea of a rotating scouring action that removes material and does not support the idea of a catastrophic impact event. We never seem to see any great amounts of rubble lying around the site of craters, even though this would be a logical expectation resulting from an explosive impact. Why do we not see debris around these craters on the Moon? Credit NASA LRO It is practically impossible to find extensive rubble-strewn areas in the immediate vicinity of craters. Even where we see craters adjacent to one another, no material from one (referred to as ejecta) can be found lying inside another, so where has that excavated material gone? Due once more to the scouring action of Birkeland currents two main things have happened: most of the pulverised debris has been lifted upward into space, and the vast fields of sharp rock fragments, for example, those now found extensively across the surface of Mars, must be a result of much of that debris having fallen back to the surface after being lifted skyward. This is also the process that supplies us with an explanation as to why we still find small pieces of Mars as meteorites lying around here on Earth. 14 | The Electric Universe answers I see
Crater chains are common, where if these were produced by impacts then it is also to be expected that tight formations of flying rocks of similar size are at this moment travelling at speed through space in formations similar to that of the carriages of a train. A plasma discharge moving across a planet or moon’s surface will tend on occasion to hesitate for short periods as it progresses. Again, for a measure of visual confirmation you can look at the often-hesitant performance of plasma filaments inside a decorative plasma ball. One result of this discharge behaviour on a body’s surface will be to produce a line of adjacent craters, the rims of which might touch or overlap. Formations such as these are just impossible to reproduce through impact theory. However, if impact was to be considered, then we should expect to see one crater being physically affected by the creation of the next but evidence for this is not being found. On some occasions, we even see crater chains that change direction to leave geometric patterns that the theory of flying rocks could never reproduce. We should accept that a large body can indeed break up due to the action of electrical forces inside it being influenced by the environment of charged space to fracture that body and that a formation of large pieces might be the result. This is what happened with comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 as it began to pass Jupiter. That comet was however particularly large and its remnant fragments rapidly drifted apart as they neared Jupiter’s atmosphere and were drawn in by its gravity. So basically, the idea of rock fragments remaining together in tight formation to produce the results we see in crater chains is not supported by the basic mechanics involved or by observation. Any theory to explain crater chains must involve a relatively constant force that moves across a body’s surface. In the case of crater chains the energy will likely be discharged in rapid bursts due to surface material densities and fluctuations in the discharge energy available from the source. 150 | The Electric Universe answers I see Crater Chain on the Moon - Credit NASA Crater Chain on Jupiter’s Moon Ganymede - Credit NASA Crater Chain on Mercury - Credit NASA - Messenger Mission
Page 2 and 3:
A Beginner’s View of Our Electric
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Dedication Acknowledgement
Page 6 and 7:
science book, this book will requir
Page 8 and 9:
Dedication For my wife Nora, my swe
Page 10 and 11:
Gerard, your eye for detail has bee
Page 12 and 13:
Foreword I continue to be amazed at
Page 14 and 15:
And so why should the theories behi
Page 16 and 17:
After having spent a good deal of t
Page 18 and 19:
In terms of what I felt I could do
Page 20 and 21:
In addition, my desire is to by-pas
Page 22 and 23:
Each and every one of these things
Page 24 and 25:
He believed that by including dark
Page 26 and 27:
They are further thought of as star
Page 28 and 29:
White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, Pulsar
Page 30 and 31:
Redshift [1-10] , in the context of
Page 32 and 33:
We have all seen Craters [1-13] in
Page 34 and 35:
Despite this being the case it seem
Page 36 and 37:
There have of course been very impo
Page 38 and 39:
Having reached this point with grav
Page 40 and 41:
make. People are not born to be sci
Page 42 and 43:
The process of nuclear fusion is no
Page 44 and 45:
We looked earlier at dark energy as
Page 46 and 47:
This is just not possible to reconc
Page 48 and 49:
to the effects of assumed, colossal
Page 50 and 51:
They have therefore failed on every
Page 52 and 53:
Comets were first described in 1950
Page 54 and 55:
“If the Earth’s orbit were repr
Page 56 and 57:
What if this powerful process based
Page 58 and 59:
One such very expensive experiment
Page 60 and 61:
… Young stars have been found in
Page 62 and 63:
In the normal state where everythin
Page 64 and 65:
We will go back to our model of a s
Page 66 and 67:
The four fundamental states of matt
Page 68 and 69:
on how much of an ‘encouraging fo
Page 70 and 71:
Dark Mode: (Low Energy) • • •
Page 72 and 73:
If a hydrogen atom has its single e
Page 74 and 75:
63 | Some basic theory that will he
Page 76 and 77:
On the domestic scene, we often fin
Page 78 and 79:
We experience two types of magnetis
Page 80 and 81:
Getting back to electric currents a
Page 82 and 83:
Here, the often powerful radiation
Page 84 and 85:
This twisted form will come as no s
Page 86 and 87:
These are all examples that involve
Page 88 and 89:
• • • • • • • • Rad
Page 90 and 91:
Helium is a gas with 2 protons and
Page 92 and 93:
5 | The work of the honourable but
Page 94 and 95:
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790) was
Page 96 and 97:
Birkeland’s name will be remember
Page 98 and 99:
Here are some of Alfvén’s other
Page 100 and 101:
Ralph E Juergens (1924 - 1979) [5-6
Page 102 and 103:
This has been a look back into hist
Page 104 and 105:
Donald E Scott. [5-11] is the third
Page 106 and 107:
Many of these ‘star objects’ ap
Page 108 and 109:
These variables are: regions of vas
Page 110 and 111: If a straight split of a star is ac
Page 112 and 113: There is one other item to highligh
Page 114 and 115: Producing planets and moons: I ment
Page 116 and 117: Here, it has been suggested that ju
Page 118 and 119: Given what has been said so far, go
Page 120 and 121: As development progressed in radio
Page 122 and 123: The way we do this today, however,
Page 124 and 125: Note that Nova is the name given to
Page 126 and 127: Is this a pipe-dream? I do not know
Page 128 and 129: Here is what this experiment infers
Page 130 and 131: This time, however, the types of ma
Page 132 and 133: Visually, it appears to us that bot
Page 134 and 135: that have no other significant valu
Page 136 and 137: In real life, a capacitor has two m
Page 138 and 139: The Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud
Page 140 and 141: As mentioned previously, comet Holm
Page 142 and 143: There are many other visual observa
Page 144 and 145: Astro-scientists interpret these pl
Page 146 and 147: Asteroids and comets are fundamenta
Page 148 and 149: When meteoroids become meteors as t
Page 150 and 151: Geology thoughts: I have looked clo
Page 152 and 153: Just before the copper projectile s
Page 154 and 155: It seems once again that what was k
Page 156 and 157: We can closely inspect many craters
Page 158 and 159: Consider the ‘doctored’ image o
Page 162 and 163: Vast areas of the hemispheres of pl
Page 164 and 165: How is it that the small bodies of
Page 166 and 167: Monument Valley Arizona - Source Wi
Page 168 and 169: The similarities between this chasm
Page 170 and 171: ‘As seen in numerous counterparts
Page 172 and 173: It may therefore be NASA and ESA th
Page 174 and 175: These gullies have an almost errati
Page 176 and 177: Flat Top Mesa It may just be me, bu
Page 178 and 179: In terms of the job I originally se
Page 180 and 181: Given that these electrical process
Page 182 and 183: We need to find the more worthy sci
Page 184 and 185: important reason behind me writing
Page 186 and 187: And finally ... Why should any of t
Page 188 and 189: [1-13] Wikipedia article - “Impac
Page 190 and 191: Chapter Five References: [5-1] Kris
Page 192 and 193: [6-23] Wal Thornhill, “Mystery of
Page 194 and 195: [6-5 ] TPOD - “Meteor Crater in A
show all

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?