A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Our</strong> solar system’s supposed accretion disk is<br />
described in the mainstream model as being a<br />
dense and flat disk-like structure <strong>of</strong> enormous<br />
size that had its own natural spin. The matter it<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> was in the form <strong>of</strong> rocks, dust and<br />
gas that had gradually been brought together<br />
by gravity from the wider space environment<br />
[6-7a] . During this process, the material collected<br />
is also said to have been distributed through<br />
the disk by gravity so that the heaviest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
elements were attracted towards the centre,<br />
an action which left the lighter gas elements<br />
nearer to the outer edge <strong>of</strong> this solar system<br />
sized disk.<br />
The Solar System disc with heavy matter<br />
inside and light matter outside © author<br />
(Where the natural spin comes from in this description and why the original matter forms a well defined flat<br />
disk rather than a three dimensional sphere, are questions that have been speculated on but famously never<br />
adequately addressed by the gravity model. The electric model answers these questions.)<br />
On the other hand, the EU version <strong>of</strong> how matter in the star creation process is collected together has been<br />
covered, in part, by previous mention <strong>of</strong> the Z-pinch process. A further aspect <strong>of</strong> influencing heavy and light<br />
elements that might help us understand the variety and distribution <strong>of</strong> planets, as indicated in the graphic above,<br />
is a specific electrical process that involves the ‘ionisation potential’ <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> elements (i.e. how<br />
easily or otherwise the electrons <strong>of</strong> their atoms can be stripped away so that differentially charged atomic and<br />
sub-atomic particles will exist). Due to the greater ionisation potential <strong>of</strong> heavy elements, they and the denser<br />
planetary bodies they comprise are the easiest for electromagnetic forces to influence and to draw towards the<br />
inner region <strong>of</strong> a plasma disk, an effect that would leave in the outer region the lighter gas elements and the<br />
larger planetary bodies they constitute. This produces the same overall result in terms <strong>of</strong> planet distribution as<br />
described by the mainstream model, but it is arrived at through considering the effects <strong>of</strong> the EM force and<br />
not gravity. This natural electrical process that apparently sorts elements and planets out is called ‘Marklund<br />
Convection [6-7b] ’. So, given the problems known to exist using the gravity model to explain the distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> planets in our solar system, could the basic principles <strong>of</strong> Marklund Convection help us with a basis for<br />
explaining why we now have small solid planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) orbiting close to the Sun<br />
and larger less dense types (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) orbiting much further away?<br />
100 | The <strong>Electric</strong> <strong>Universe</strong> answers I see<br />
HEAVY ELEMENTS<br />
LIGHT ELEMENTS