A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Recommendations

Info

Is this a pipe-dream? I do not know, but what I can say is that I will personally do what I can in my own small way to help bring this about. It is an amusing thought to consider that the legendary Sherlock Holmes would have seen right through the weakness of the almighty gravity story and that he would have constructed an assessment of the EU model as the party actually responsible for the wonderful universe we have! The idea that gravity-initiated implosions and explosions of stars being able to expel mechanical shock waves powerfully enough to make dust and gas glow to emit the most harmful radiation in the universe is bunkum, hogwash, claptrap, and codswallop … in my opinion! Pulsars, Neutron Stars and Magnetars: These supposed different ‘types of star’ and other related star types are treated by traditional astro-science as mysterious, but at the same time, understandable enough to describe to the public in confident terms. This has meant that the information given to us about them has left the impression that they really are all stars of different types. It will become clear, however, that they are all ‘effects’ rather than objects distinct from other stars, in fact, EU theory suggests that all of them may arise from electrical activity in the magnetospheres of otherwise ordinary stars. The main discriminating factors for the powerful events we detect in space should now be apparent, these being the differing types and amounts of ionised matter, energy and time. Time, of course, plays a part in every event, but in the case of the effects being discussed here, it is appropriate to highlight its role in particular. Remember that events in the universe happen at a pace that is apparently so slow we do not think to consider its effect. We have been observing deep space and the events out there for nowhere near one hundred years, so again our arrogance and lack of appreciation of the actual scale of things blinds us to the fact that our judgement of these events, which we effectively see in still picture form, is in no way good enough to inform us fully of what the movie we are watching is really about. The observed behaviour of so-called Pulsars has given them the name ‘lighthouses of the universe’. This has been a handy analogy to use, but is misleading in the impression it conjures up of a rotating beam of light. Pulsars in standard theory are incredibly dense, narrow radiation beam emitting, rotating bodies formed through the dying star notion of a supernova event. They are labelled ‘lighthouses’ because they are observed producing pulses of EM radiation (X-rays) on a very regular basis. There is actually no direct evidence of actual rotation that would bring about a sweeping lighthouse beam effect; it is only because they pulse that physical rotation has been assumed. This is old and narrow thinking again! The radiation they emit can be identified and measured, but this is pretty much all that is known about them; everything else has been guesswork, and as with so many other things, nobody has seen one as an actual object in the eyepiece of a telescope! The idea of a beam emanating from a rotating body is immediately suspect when in the context of our plasma universe we consider a simple electrical explanation for the behaviour we see. However, before we do this, we will have a further brief look at the standard story around pulsars. 115 | The Electric Universe answers I see
I think it is reasonable to ask, how, out of the thousands of pulsars detected so far, all of their assumed narrow beams of radiation are able to find Earth in their sweeping path. This suggests that pulsars must be extremely common in space. I do admit this would be possible, especially since their claimed narrow beams would spread out to become broad cones over distance, but there is no firm evidence to believe any of this is true. Moreover, astro-science seems to assume that all of the power emitted by pulsars can be detected and measured accurately. What then about the situation where the Earth may only find itself swept by the edge of one of these cone-like beams? How in that case could the true radiation levels measured be considered accurate enough data on which to make absolute judgements about the object from which they came? Mere ‘convenient analogy’, the mark of a doomed approach, seems to take the lead with astro-scientists today. The only exception to this is when ever more complicated mathematics indicates something might just be real, so if it suits their purpose, they typically go ahead and make it so! The mathematical invention of a rotating body with a narrow sweeping beam of powerful radiation is rejected in favour of what common sense EU theory has to say. In this respect, I want to explain a simple electrical circuit that provides the same visual effect that a pulsar does as it demonstrates the electrical principal that probably lies behind their observed behaviour. This is a simple circuit in which the neon bulb on the right flashes repeatedly (pulses), just as a pulsar does. Circuit of a simple relaxation oscillator © author (Refer to the small inset graph.) (1) Current flow from the DC source is limited by the resistor so time is needed to build up charge in the capacitor. (2) When the charge in the capacitor reaches the ‘striking or breakdown voltage’ of the neon gas inside the bulb, a shorter time is taken for current to flow (discharge) from the capacitor through the gas to briefly light it up; this also lets the current make its way back to the negative side of the supply. The key here is the ‘striking or breakdown voltage’. This can be monitored at point ‘A’ where we see the waveform of voltage reaching an appropriately high value that will switch the neon gas inside the bulb from its plasma ‘dark mode’ to ‘glow mode’. When this happens we see the brief period of glow mode as a flash of light before the gas reverts back to its dark mode. After a discharge takes place in the neon gas, the circuit will go on to do the same thing over and over again until such time as the DC supply is removed. Might this flashing action be mimicking the behaviour of a pulsar? Yes it does, and this is what is actually happening out in space, except on a scale that is hard to imagine. What we see here in this simple circuit is basic electrical engineering in practice. It is the same level of theory that is taught to first year electrical engineering students in colleges. 116 | The Electric Universe answers I see + DC VOLTAGE _ RESISTOR CAPACITOR A 1 2 + VOLTAGE AT A NEON BULB TIME
Page 2 and 3:
A Beginner’s View of Our Electric
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Dedication Acknowledgement
Page 6 and 7:
science book, this book will requir
Page 8 and 9:
Dedication For my wife Nora, my swe
Page 10 and 11:
Gerard, your eye for detail has bee
Page 12 and 13:
Foreword I continue to be amazed at
Page 14 and 15:
And so why should the theories behi
Page 16 and 17:
After having spent a good deal of t
Page 18 and 19:
In terms of what I felt I could do
Page 20 and 21:
In addition, my desire is to by-pas
Page 22 and 23:
Each and every one of these things
Page 24 and 25:
He believed that by including dark
Page 26 and 27:
They are further thought of as star
Page 28 and 29:
White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, Pulsar
Page 30 and 31:
Redshift [1-10] , in the context of
Page 32 and 33:
We have all seen Craters [1-13] in
Page 34 and 35:
Despite this being the case it seem
Page 36 and 37:
There have of course been very impo
Page 38 and 39:
Having reached this point with grav
Page 40 and 41:
make. People are not born to be sci
Page 42 and 43:
The process of nuclear fusion is no
Page 44 and 45:
We looked earlier at dark energy as
Page 46 and 47:
This is just not possible to reconc
Page 48 and 49:
to the effects of assumed, colossal
Page 50 and 51:
They have therefore failed on every
Page 52 and 53:
Comets were first described in 1950
Page 54 and 55:
“If the Earth’s orbit were repr
Page 56 and 57:
What if this powerful process based
Page 58 and 59:
One such very expensive experiment
Page 60 and 61:
… Young stars have been found in
Page 62 and 63:
In the normal state where everythin
Page 64 and 65:
We will go back to our model of a s
Page 66 and 67:
The four fundamental states of matt
Page 68 and 69:
on how much of an ‘encouraging fo
Page 70 and 71:
Dark Mode: (Low Energy) • • •
Page 72 and 73:
If a hydrogen atom has its single e
Page 74 and 75:
63 | Some basic theory that will he
Page 76 and 77: On the domestic scene, we often fin
Page 78 and 79: We experience two types of magnetis
Page 80 and 81: Getting back to electric currents a
Page 82 and 83: Here, the often powerful radiation
Page 84 and 85: This twisted form will come as no s
Page 86 and 87: These are all examples that involve
Page 88 and 89: • • • • • • • • Rad
Page 90 and 91: Helium is a gas with 2 protons and
Page 92 and 93: 5 | The work of the honourable but
Page 94 and 95: Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790) was
Page 96 and 97: Birkeland’s name will be remember
Page 98 and 99: Here are some of Alfvén’s other
Page 100 and 101: Ralph E Juergens (1924 - 1979) [5-6
Page 102 and 103: This has been a look back into hist
Page 104 and 105: Donald E Scott. [5-11] is the third
Page 106 and 107: Many of these ‘star objects’ ap
Page 108 and 109: These variables are: regions of vas
Page 110 and 111: If a straight split of a star is ac
Page 112 and 113: There is one other item to highligh
Page 114 and 115: Producing planets and moons: I ment
Page 116 and 117: Here, it has been suggested that ju
Page 118 and 119: Given what has been said so far, go
Page 120 and 121: As development progressed in radio
Page 122 and 123: The way we do this today, however,
Page 124 and 125: Note that Nova is the name given to
Page 128 and 129: Here is what this experiment infers
Page 130 and 131: This time, however, the types of ma
Page 132 and 133: Visually, it appears to us that bot
Page 134 and 135: that have no other significant valu
Page 136 and 137: In real life, a capacitor has two m
Page 138 and 139: The Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud
Page 140 and 141: As mentioned previously, comet Holm
Page 142 and 143: There are many other visual observa
Page 144 and 145: Astro-scientists interpret these pl
Page 146 and 147: Asteroids and comets are fundamenta
Page 148 and 149: When meteoroids become meteors as t
Page 150 and 151: Geology thoughts: I have looked clo
Page 152 and 153: Just before the copper projectile s
Page 154 and 155: It seems once again that what was k
Page 156 and 157: We can closely inspect many craters
Page 158 and 159: Consider the ‘doctored’ image o
Page 160 and 161: The central peaks often seen inside
Page 162 and 163: Vast areas of the hemispheres of pl
Page 164 and 165: How is it that the small bodies of
Page 166 and 167: Monument Valley Arizona - Source Wi
Page 168 and 169: The similarities between this chasm
Page 170 and 171: ‘As seen in numerous counterparts
Page 172 and 173: It may therefore be NASA and ESA th
Page 174 and 175: These gullies have an almost errati
Page 176 and 177:
Flat Top Mesa It may just be me, bu
Page 178 and 179:
In terms of the job I originally se
Page 180 and 181:
Given that these electrical process
Page 182 and 183:
We need to find the more worthy sci
Page 184 and 185:
important reason behind me writing
Page 186 and 187:
And finally ... Why should any of t
Page 188 and 189:
[1-13] Wikipedia article - “Impac
Page 190 and 191:
Chapter Five References: [5-1] Kris
Page 192 and 193:
[6-23] Wal Thornhill, “Mystery of
Page 194 and 195:
[6-5 ] TPOD - “Meteor Crater in A
show all

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?