A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

We can closely inspect many craters and have even had our hands on some of them. Should it not then be
reasonable to expect that our ability to deduce their cause through common sense and reference to laboratory
evidence might triumph? Sadly no, this does not seem to be the case, for the existence of electricity in space
is denied and so the blinkers of gravitational and mechanical forces stubbornly still hold sway. Astro-scientists
just refuse to consider the electrical theories that go well beyond those of gravity to provide many of the answers
they seek. Their collective lack of education in electrical and plasma science is holding them and science back
while also doing nothing to enhance the knowledge of the interested public. I expand further here on common
features of craters and cratering that generally go unnoticed or are taken for granted without thinking.
More on the question of, why do craters always appear round?
Experiments claimed to reproduce convincing circular craters no
matter the angle of trajectory of the projectile go against the apparent
logic of the situation where one would think that a shallow angle
strike would result in an elongated surface scar. This idea seems
to me to be reasonable and would appear at the very least to be a
possibility, yes? No, astro-scientists do not place much weight on
this obvious aspect and tend only to offer their standard impact,
volcanism and surface collapse models to explain crater creation.
One of their lines of explanation is that small, fast moving bodies
on course to strike large bodies with atmospheres will heat up and
explode at the surface with enough force to produce a circular crater directly beneath the blast. An assumption
of this model is that none of the significant fragments of the incoming projectile would actually remain –
i.e. the power of the explosion would be significant enough to ensure that the whole projectile is completely
disintegrated.
It is also interesting to note that with impact being claimed as the cause, it could never be the case that the
various materials of which rocky projectiles will consist would always react to impact and heating in the way
typically described. Every object would have its own speed, angle of entry, material construction and chemical
make-up that would ensure at least some of them were not completely destroyed with zero debris and no telltale
signs left lying around on the surface. So what we are being asked to believe is that all projectiles no matter
their size, composition, speed and angle of trajectory will disintegrate totally to leave round craters and no
debris or other visual clues in the surrounding area. I leave you to ponder this!
145 | The Electric Universe answers I see
Timocharis crater on the Moon - Credit NASA LRO