A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

The result of this mathematical assumption was the presumption of an actual body that possessed super gravity
and also that this body could spin very rapidly while physically remaining together to emit copious amounts
of deadly radiation as particles were drawn to its surface. This is what the standard story basically describes
neutron stars as being. The origin they are assumed to spring from begins as the compressed core remnant of a
very large star when it dies; a supernova event. (Please remember, this is according to the standard story and we
will stay with this for just a little longer.) The collapse of very large stars is said to initiate the process of extreme
atomic compression which in this case breaks atoms apart into their constituent sub-atomic components of
neutrons, protons and electrons. At this level of structure breakdown the protons and electrons are forced to
recombine to become ‘new’ neutrons. These, together with the original neutrons of the star then form a solid
mass of neutrons which is claimed to have absolutely no space between those then cosy particles. What results
is a most perfect sphere of neutron material that is calculated to be between 10 to 20 kilometres in diameter.
Most neutron stars are also claimed to have a high rate of spin associated with them. Here you can think of them
being like pulsars emitting high frequency EM radiation but without the detectable beaming action. This leads
to an interesting claim by astro-science that beggars belief as it highlights the extent to which they allow their
imaginations to go. Despite the laboratory proven fact that neutrons cannot remain together or even remain
stable individually for any more than 15 minutes, it is claimed that many of these kilometres in diameter bodies
can actually spin at a rate of many tens of thousands of revolutions per minute and stay together. To highlight
the basis of this extreme claim, if we take the diameter for the (typical) neutron star J1739-285 as being, say, 15
kilometres, can you imagine this incredibly huge ball spinning as is claimed at 51,720rpm? Well, that is what
is being asked of us. This would mean that the outer surface of that sphere would rotate at 47.1 x 862 (i.e. the
circumference of the star in kilometres multiplied by number of revolutions per second) which provides us with
a figure of 40,600 kilometres per second or 146 million kilometres per hour! I leave you to consider this.
The bottom line is that neutron stars have never been ‘observed’ as anything other than high frequency EM
radiation sources and apparent gravitational anomalies in space. They are only theorised to exist and have never
been observed in physical form. In EU terms they are an ‘effect’ rather than an object; one that is linked with
supernovae events that have at their heart typical Z-pinch events. These in turn produce stellar scale EM forces
that act on and within dense plasma to bring about the effects now mistakenly attributed to gravity [6-29] .
Magnetars: These again are said to be tremendously dense objects which, this time, are detected through the
outrageously strong magnetic fields attributed to them and the effect these fields have on matter within their
reach. Magnetars have only been hailed as distinct and ‘real objects’ in the past few decades, yet astro-science
was quick to say they can be satisfactorily understood. However, the effects apparently observed that have
encouraged their invention are again the seeds from which fairy-tale objects are grown. They are, in fact,
understandable through the same creation methodology as provided to explain pulsars and neutron stars.
11 | The Electric Universe answers I see