A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Is this a pipe-dream? I do not know, but what I can say is that I will personally do what I can in my own small
way to help bring this about. It is an amusing thought to consider that the legendary Sherlock Holmes would
have seen right through the weakness of the almighty gravity story and that he would have constructed an
assessment of the EU model as the party actually responsible for the wonderful universe we have! The idea that
gravity-initiated implosions and explosions of stars being able to expel mechanical shock waves powerfully
enough to make dust and gas glow to emit the most harmful radiation in the universe is bunkum, hogwash,
claptrap, and codswallop … in my opinion!
Pulsars, Neutron Stars and Magnetars: These supposed different ‘types of star’ and other related star types
are treated by traditional astro-science as mysterious, but at the same time, understandable enough to describe to
the public in confident terms. This has meant that the information given to us about them has left the impression
that they really are all stars of different types. It will become clear, however, that they are all ‘effects’ rather than
objects distinct from other stars, in fact, EU theory suggests that all of them may arise from electrical activity
in the magnetospheres of otherwise ordinary stars.
The main discriminating factors for the powerful events we detect in space should now be apparent, these being
the differing types and amounts of ionised matter, energy and time. Time, of course, plays a part in every event,
but in the case of the effects being discussed here, it is appropriate to highlight its role in particular. Remember
that events in the universe happen at a pace that is apparently so slow we do not think to consider its effect.
We have been observing deep space and the events out there for nowhere near one hundred years, so again our
arrogance and lack of appreciation of the actual scale of things blinds us to the fact that our judgement of these
events, which we effectively see in still picture form, is in no way good enough to inform us fully of what the
movie we are watching is really about.
The observed behaviour of so-called Pulsars has given them the name ‘lighthouses of the universe’. This
has been a handy analogy to use, but is misleading in the impression it conjures up of a rotating beam of
light. Pulsars in standard theory are incredibly dense, narrow radiation beam emitting, rotating bodies formed
through the dying star notion of a supernova event. They are labelled ‘lighthouses’ because they are observed
producing pulses of EM radiation (X-rays) on a very regular basis. There is actually no direct evidence of actual
rotation that would bring about a sweeping lighthouse beam effect; it is only because they pulse that physical
rotation has been assumed. This is old and narrow thinking again! The radiation they emit can be identified and
measured, but this is pretty much all that is known about them; everything else has been guesswork, and as
with so many other things, nobody has seen one as an actual object in the eyepiece of a telescope! The idea of
a beam emanating from a rotating body is immediately suspect when in the context of our plasma universe we
consider a simple electrical explanation for the behaviour we see. However, before we do this, we will have a
further brief look at the standard story around pulsars.
115 | The Electric Universe answers I see