A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Recommendations

Info

to the effects of assumed, colossal gravitational forces. The case made by astro-science for the existence of these ‘gravity monsters’ has been built on a foundation of unrestrained mathematics and is another good example of a theory that everyone has just accepted. Black Holes are components of the gravity model which, in themselves, lend nothing to the purpose of this book. Their explanation has had 'extra bits' added as required, so the overall story around them has become complicated and confused. Not many people understand what is actually being described and any information that does appear tends to be of a sensational science fiction nature. I will say more later about the forces and processes that have led astro-scientists to believe that Black Holes are real. I will leave commenting on theories for a moment to say something about the information given to us through the collaboration of astro-science with various parts of the media. Although interesting and highly convincing, many of the documentaries, magazines and books that have been produced to explain ideas from astro-science only present a narrow, superficial view of things. It is true that if we look further we are often put off by the complexity we find, so we tend to quickly stop looking and thinking about these things. However, it seems that our universe is less complicated than currently portrayed, so in what lies ahead, I want to introduce the alternative and simpler theories which for many of us bear this out. I am led here to think of the wonderfully simple visual education experience that could be produced around these alternative theories, if even just a portion of the funds allocated to astro-science documentaries and professional presentations was made available. We all too frequently find ourselves taking a difficult route when trying to understand things or solve problems, only later to find that we have disregarded the simpler and more obvious routes that should first have been considered. This was a concept known and understood well by a particular English Friar and philosopher of the 1300s, William of Ockham. He supported the notion that when looking for solutions, we should not make unnecessary assumptions and should initially consider the more obvious and simple options. Today this idea is summarised under the label ‘Ockham’s Razor’, and in terms of the current potpourri of complicated theories that astro-science has spent its time on, it certainly seems applicable as a caution to heed. The thermonuclear model of the Sun also has many problems, mainly because the Sun does not behave in the way astro-scientists assume and tell us it should. The Sun has provided obvious clues about the way it works for many decades but the questions that have arisen from these clues have, unsurprisingly, not been satisfactorily answered. The situation is embarrassing, and it is a rather odd one for astro-science to continue to defend, as they do. Why is this embarrassing? Well, it is because we are being asked to believe that the Sun operates in a way that can be described as both a severe stretch of the imagination and a scientific impossibility! Here, astro-science's attitude to the thermonuclear model of the Sun cannot be called an open-minded one. Despite great amounts of evidence that indicate better alternative theories, astro-scientists seem strangely unshakable in hanging on to their outdated ideas and unworkable theories. A far more plausible explanation for the Sun’s operation is available if we include and consider things from electrical and plasma science with which we are already familiar. From that new vantage point, we are able to take a fresh look at how all stars operate. 37 | We are waiting for answers to these questions
3 | We are waiting for answers to these questions Here are just some of the issues we have with the current thermonuclear model of the Sun: Why is it that the Sun’s ‘nuclear core’ temperature of around 15,000,000˚C drops to around 6,000˚C at the surface then increases again to 2,000,000˚C (and beyond) in the Sun’s surrounding corona? Solar astronomers have been working for decades to answer this question and the absence of anything convincing speaks volumes about the basis on which they have looked at it. They have not even come close to convincing serious-minded folk with what they have come up with, and they remain puzzled. Amusingly, I have seen this temperature profile problem described as ‘getting warmer the further you walk away from a fire!’ Then we have the issue of Sunspots. These are described as being caused by magnetic fields leaving and entering the surface of the Sun. The fact that the centres of sunspots are found to be 1,500˚C cooler than the surrounding photosphere is typically ignored in explanations that include talk of 'tangled magnetic fields'. A Sunspot compared to the size of the Earth (adapted image) Original Image Credit: SST Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences They say these tangled fields stop an amount of heat energy from inside the Sun getting to its surface. This is extreme conjecture and a testable theory that has never been proved workable. Astro-scientists get in a muddle and tie their own hands by avoiding discussion of the simple fact that electric currents are required in order to generate the magnetic fields they so often rely on in their explanations. How can we make progress when they are so selective in what they choose to consider from existing knowledge? The temperature profile we are currently given of our Sun © author Next we have the Sunspot Cycle. This is where our Sun has been observed to go through similar patterns of sunspot production in approximate 11-year cycles. Astro-scientists have repeatedly tried to explain this through complicated magnetic fields affecting one another. Here they have limited themselves by thinking only of things from inside the Sun; they have no framework whatsoever for considering forces that exist outside the Sun.
Page 2 and 3: A Beginner’s View of Our Electric
Page 4 and 5: Contents Dedication Acknowledgement
Page 6 and 7: science book, this book will requir
Page 8 and 9: Dedication For my wife Nora, my swe
Page 10 and 11: Gerard, your eye for detail has bee
Page 12 and 13: Foreword I continue to be amazed at
Page 14 and 15: And so why should the theories behi
Page 16 and 17: After having spent a good deal of t
Page 18 and 19: In terms of what I felt I could do
Page 20 and 21: In addition, my desire is to by-pas
Page 22 and 23: Each and every one of these things
Page 24 and 25: He believed that by including dark
Page 26 and 27: They are further thought of as star
Page 28 and 29: White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, Pulsar
Page 30 and 31: Redshift [1-10] , in the context of
Page 32 and 33: We have all seen Craters [1-13] in
Page 34 and 35: Despite this being the case it seem
Page 36 and 37: There have of course been very impo
Page 38 and 39: Having reached this point with grav
Page 40 and 41: make. People are not born to be sci
Page 42 and 43: The process of nuclear fusion is no
Page 44 and 45: We looked earlier at dark energy as
Page 46 and 47: This is just not possible to reconc
Page 50 and 51: They have therefore failed on every
Page 52 and 53: Comets were first described in 1950
Page 54 and 55: “If the Earth’s orbit were repr
Page 56 and 57: What if this powerful process based
Page 58 and 59: One such very expensive experiment
Page 60 and 61: … Young stars have been found in
Page 62 and 63: In the normal state where everythin
Page 64 and 65: We will go back to our model of a s
Page 66 and 67: The four fundamental states of matt
Page 68 and 69: on how much of an ‘encouraging fo
Page 70 and 71: Dark Mode: (Low Energy) • • •
Page 72 and 73: If a hydrogen atom has its single e
Page 74 and 75: 63 | Some basic theory that will he
Page 76 and 77: On the domestic scene, we often fin
Page 78 and 79: We experience two types of magnetis
Page 80 and 81: Getting back to electric currents a
Page 82 and 83: Here, the often powerful radiation
Page 84 and 85: This twisted form will come as no s
Page 86 and 87: These are all examples that involve
Page 88 and 89: • • • • • • • • Rad
Page 90 and 91: Helium is a gas with 2 protons and
Page 92 and 93: 5 | The work of the honourable but
Page 94 and 95: Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790) was
Page 96 and 97: Birkeland’s name will be remember
Page 98 and 99:
Here are some of Alfvén’s other
Page 100 and 101:
Ralph E Juergens (1924 - 1979) [5-6
Page 102 and 103:
This has been a look back into hist
Page 104 and 105:
Donald E Scott. [5-11] is the third
Page 106 and 107:
Many of these ‘star objects’ ap
Page 108 and 109:
These variables are: regions of vas
Page 110 and 111:
If a straight split of a star is ac
Page 112 and 113:
There is one other item to highligh
Page 114 and 115:
Producing planets and moons: I ment
Page 116 and 117:
Here, it has been suggested that ju
Page 118 and 119:
Given what has been said so far, go
Page 120 and 121:
As development progressed in radio
Page 122 and 123:
The way we do this today, however,
Page 124 and 125:
Note that Nova is the name given to
Page 126 and 127:
Is this a pipe-dream? I do not know
Page 128 and 129:
Here is what this experiment infers
Page 130 and 131:
This time, however, the types of ma
Page 132 and 133:
Visually, it appears to us that bot
Page 134 and 135:
that have no other significant valu
Page 136 and 137:
In real life, a capacitor has two m
Page 138 and 139:
The Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud
Page 140 and 141:
As mentioned previously, comet Holm
Page 142 and 143:
There are many other visual observa
Page 144 and 145:
Astro-scientists interpret these pl
Page 146 and 147:
Asteroids and comets are fundamenta
Page 148 and 149:
When meteoroids become meteors as t
Page 150 and 151:
Geology thoughts: I have looked clo
Page 152 and 153:
Just before the copper projectile s
Page 154 and 155:
It seems once again that what was k
Page 156 and 157:
We can closely inspect many craters
Page 158 and 159:
Consider the ‘doctored’ image o
Page 160 and 161:
The central peaks often seen inside
Page 162 and 163:
Vast areas of the hemispheres of pl
Page 164 and 165:
How is it that the small bodies of
Page 166 and 167:
Monument Valley Arizona - Source Wi
Page 168 and 169:
The similarities between this chasm
Page 170 and 171:
‘As seen in numerous counterparts
Page 172 and 173:
It may therefore be NASA and ESA th
Page 174 and 175:
These gullies have an almost errati
Page 176 and 177:
Flat Top Mesa It may just be me, bu
Page 178 and 179:
In terms of the job I originally se
Page 180 and 181:
Given that these electrical process
Page 182 and 183:
We need to find the more worthy sci
Page 184 and 185:
important reason behind me writing
Page 186 and 187:
And finally ... Why should any of t
Page 188 and 189:
[1-13] Wikipedia article - “Impac
Page 190 and 191:
Chapter Five References: [5-1] Kris
Page 192 and 193:
[6-23] Wal Thornhill, “Mystery of
Page 194 and 195:
[6-5 ] TPOD - “Meteor Crater in A
show all

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?