07.03.2013 Views

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dr. Charles E R Bruce (1902 – 1979) [5-5]<br />

A Scotsman who was an astrophysicist and writer, born near Glasgow and<br />

educated at Edinburgh University; Dr. Bruce was to become known as a<br />

leading expert on the causes and effects <strong>of</strong> lightning. His insights allowed<br />

him to link what we observe regarding lightning behaviour here on Earth<br />

with the activities he had observed at the photosphere ‘surface’ <strong>of</strong> the Sun,<br />

which by implication, would also apply to the photospheres <strong>of</strong> all other stars<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same type. Bruce used his scientific awareness <strong>of</strong> lightning within his<br />

considerations <strong>of</strong> the action taking place in the Sun’s photosphere because<br />

he viewed it as also being electrical in nature. From the credible scientific<br />

position he established through this approach, he was able to provide answers<br />

to puzzling questions that had arisen from observations <strong>of</strong> the Sun; questions<br />

that standard astronomy had previously not been able to answer.<br />

His work in this respect included the observed variability <strong>of</strong> star energy, as<br />

indicated by changes in the ‘radiant brightness’ that some <strong>of</strong> them display.<br />

Charles E R Bruce<br />

In addressing this, he believed that the Sun’s surface was being subjected to<br />

the equivalent <strong>of</strong> lightning strikes here on Earth, with the exception that these would be on a much larger scale<br />

<strong>of</strong> power, number and frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence. From this, he went on to suggest that the variability <strong>of</strong> star<br />

brightness could be explained through an association with a variation in the electric driving force that a star<br />

experiences on its plasmasphere from its surrounding cosmic environment.<br />

Bruce expanded this view to encompass electrical events in the more distant reaches <strong>of</strong> space, notably where<br />

Novae were concerned. He suggested that a nova event was electrical in nature and that it did not necessarily<br />

represent the death <strong>of</strong> a star. This was in stark opposition to the standard idea <strong>of</strong> gravitational collapse producing a<br />

nova event when a star dies. Although Bruce adhered to standard theory regarding the non-proven thermonuclear<br />

model for star operation, his preference was always for tangible pro<strong>of</strong>, especially where it could be obtained<br />

through observation and experiment. Through his core adherence to a pragmatic approach, and in the eyes <strong>of</strong><br />

many <strong>of</strong> his colleagues, the output <strong>of</strong> his research activities was viewed as having come from sound practical<br />

foundations. Significantly, he continued in this vein to suggest the existence <strong>of</strong> Quasars, and that these were<br />

born from galactic scale electrical discharges.<br />

Thinking as he did, Bruce was the man who introduced the word ‘electricity’ into astronomy. This, however,<br />

spelled disaster for him as his theories began to spread and eventually become ignored by the mainstream. The<br />

day is coming, however, when Dr. Bruce will be vindicated and recognised as the visionary man he was.<br />

| The work <strong>of</strong> the honourable but ignored

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!