A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Dr. Charles E R Bruce (1902 – 1979) [5-5]<br />
A Scotsman who was an astrophysicist and writer, born near Glasgow and<br />
educated at Edinburgh University; Dr. Bruce was to become known as a<br />
leading expert on the causes and effects <strong>of</strong> lightning. His insights allowed<br />
him to link what we observe regarding lightning behaviour here on Earth<br />
with the activities he had observed at the photosphere ‘surface’ <strong>of</strong> the Sun,<br />
which by implication, would also apply to the photospheres <strong>of</strong> all other stars<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same type. Bruce used his scientific awareness <strong>of</strong> lightning within his<br />
considerations <strong>of</strong> the action taking place in the Sun’s photosphere because<br />
he viewed it as also being electrical in nature. From the credible scientific<br />
position he established through this approach, he was able to provide answers<br />
to puzzling questions that had arisen from observations <strong>of</strong> the Sun; questions<br />
that standard astronomy had previously not been able to answer.<br />
His work in this respect included the observed variability <strong>of</strong> star energy, as<br />
indicated by changes in the ‘radiant brightness’ that some <strong>of</strong> them display.<br />
Charles E R Bruce<br />
In addressing this, he believed that the Sun’s surface was being subjected to<br />
the equivalent <strong>of</strong> lightning strikes here on Earth, with the exception that these would be on a much larger scale<br />
<strong>of</strong> power, number and frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence. From this, he went on to suggest that the variability <strong>of</strong> star<br />
brightness could be explained through an association with a variation in the electric driving force that a star<br />
experiences on its plasmasphere from its surrounding cosmic environment.<br />
Bruce expanded this view to encompass electrical events in the more distant reaches <strong>of</strong> space, notably where<br />
Novae were concerned. He suggested that a nova event was electrical in nature and that it did not necessarily<br />
represent the death <strong>of</strong> a star. This was in stark opposition to the standard idea <strong>of</strong> gravitational collapse producing a<br />
nova event when a star dies. Although Bruce adhered to standard theory regarding the non-proven thermonuclear<br />
model for star operation, his preference was always for tangible pro<strong>of</strong>, especially where it could be obtained<br />
through observation and experiment. Through his core adherence to a pragmatic approach, and in the eyes <strong>of</strong><br />
many <strong>of</strong> his colleagues, the output <strong>of</strong> his research activities was viewed as having come from sound practical<br />
foundations. Significantly, he continued in this vein to suggest the existence <strong>of</strong> Quasars, and that these were<br />
born from galactic scale electrical discharges.<br />
Thinking as he did, Bruce was the man who introduced the word ‘electricity’ into astronomy. This, however,<br />
spelled disaster for him as his theories began to spread and eventually become ignored by the mainstream. The<br />
day is coming, however, when Dr. Bruce will be vindicated and recognised as the visionary man he was.<br />
| The work <strong>of</strong> the honourable but ignored