A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

Recommendations

Info

There are many other visual observations and data records that contradict standard comet theory and which seem to support the logic and experimental results behind the alternative electric theory. Why in 1991 was comet Halley seen to ‘expel’ a cloud of glowing dust from its 15 kilometre nucleus, where this cloud then grew rapidly to be 300,000 kilometres in diameter, even though Halley was 14 times the distance from the Sun than the Earth is [6-47a] [6-47b] . What level of heat from the Sun could have been present to affect so significantly a piece of ice at that far distance? In this case, and as previously with comet Holmes, the explanation is electrical. The double layer surrounding the comet’s negatively charged nucleus simply interacted with a significant concentration of positively charged plasma in the heliosphere (produced by a CME from the Sun perhaps) at that location. Observations also indicate that some comets seem not to be very solid or that they are bodies with very little mass. Astro-scientists have taken this apparent lightness (fluffiness, as they call it) as evidence that comets are indeed snowball-like or that they may be internally ‘honeycombed’ in some way by empty tunnels and voids. Bear in mind that these athletically creative views are offered confidently despite the great amounts of evidence that contradict the standard model for comets. One wonders how this can be, especially where we have close-up images of comet nuclei showing rugged, rocky, cratered, gouged and pitted surfaces that bear no resemblance to ice in any of its forms in any way whatsoever. The apparent ‘lightness’ being detected can be accounted for if we are willing to accept that gravity itself is fundamentally electrical and just another aspect of the EM force. Quite a leap, I know, but there are good reasons to accept this as true. The main piece of evidence here is that the weight (mass) of a negatively charged body located within the positively charged environment of space, would in the view of some really clever people, measure differently depending on the amount of negative charge it takes on. In terms of comets in space, this means that the highly negatively charged nuclei of comets travelling within the highly positively charged environment around our Sun, where the electrical difference between them would be very significant, would appear to us as if their weight was akin to that of a lump of polystyrene foam! I personally find the thought of electrically modifiable gravity fascinating, and if true, it could provide a route to consider explanations for other puzzles in astro-science and from archaeology and geology that have traditionally had a relationship with gravity; significant puzzles that have been around for a very long time. I underline, however, that this is my own thinking wandering off at a tangent [6-48a] . The craters and other sharply defined features that we see on the surfaces of comets can also be explained. Here once again we must keep in mind the scale of electric currents that are potentially available to flow between the plasma environment of space and the highly charged surfaces of comets. It may seem here tempting to imagine powerful Birkeland currents cutting into and lifting material away from comet surfaces, and this is fine to have as a mental image, for it is indeed what happens. 131 | The Electric Universe answers I see
Consider the electricity available around us. Have you ever seen a powerful electric welding spark or a simple electric fuse wire blow in a sudden flash at home? If you have, then you will know that there certainly seems to be a lot of instantaneous energy involved. This is because significant levels of electric current will vaporise metal and send debris flying as sparks in all directions. It can also result in surrounding surfaces becoming blackened with fine soot and splattered with tiny metal spheres. This may be the only evidence left behind when an old fashioned fuse wire ‘blows’ in the home, for it is common for those wire safety devices to totally disintegrate. That example is on a tiny scale but it highlights the effect that electric currents have when allowed to flow instantly and in great quantity. We need also to keep in mind that this example would involve only a few amps of electric current at the level we use in the domestic setting and not at the scales of millions and possibly billions of amps of current that would be released in space. Now consider the potential effect of those exceptionally dense Birkeland currents on a planetary scale. The idea of these operating within our solar system could easily provoke a mental picture of great damage being done to the surfaces of our planets and moons. We would not need to expand this picture much further to also appreciate that material broken up by these currents and ionised could also be removed from the surfaces of comets and asteroids by such EM forces. Is it not then likely that the craters, channels, ridges and other geological features seen on comets and asteroids, might also be products of this process? The concept of an asteroid or comet-like body being ‘machined’ by a Birkeland current © author This is the type of event that indeed seems to happen when comets get near the Sun and become electrically over-stressed or when they get too close to other charged bodies that have vastly different charge levels. It surely appears through logic and observation to be the case that when voltage difference between areas of a comet’s negative surface and its surrounding positive environment is great enough, then classic Birkeland currents will spin up from their surfaces to produce with powerful ease and also gentle erosion, the range of features we see. 132 | The Electric Universe answers I see Electric Arc Welding © www.electrical-picture.com
Page 2 and 3:
A Beginner’s View of Our Electric
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Dedication Acknowledgement
Page 6 and 7:
science book, this book will requir
Page 8 and 9:
Dedication For my wife Nora, my swe
Page 10 and 11:
Gerard, your eye for detail has bee
Page 12 and 13:
Foreword I continue to be amazed at
Page 14 and 15:
And so why should the theories behi
Page 16 and 17:
After having spent a good deal of t
Page 18 and 19:
In terms of what I felt I could do
Page 20 and 21:
In addition, my desire is to by-pas
Page 22 and 23:
Each and every one of these things
Page 24 and 25:
He believed that by including dark
Page 26 and 27:
They are further thought of as star
Page 28 and 29:
White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, Pulsar
Page 30 and 31:
Redshift [1-10] , in the context of
Page 32 and 33:
We have all seen Craters [1-13] in
Page 34 and 35:
Despite this being the case it seem
Page 36 and 37:
There have of course been very impo
Page 38 and 39:
Having reached this point with grav
Page 40 and 41:
make. People are not born to be sci
Page 42 and 43:
The process of nuclear fusion is no
Page 44 and 45:
We looked earlier at dark energy as
Page 46 and 47:
This is just not possible to reconc
Page 48 and 49:
to the effects of assumed, colossal
Page 50 and 51:
They have therefore failed on every
Page 52 and 53:
Comets were first described in 1950
Page 54 and 55:
“If the Earth’s orbit were repr
Page 56 and 57:
What if this powerful process based
Page 58 and 59:
One such very expensive experiment
Page 60 and 61:
… Young stars have been found in
Page 62 and 63:
In the normal state where everythin
Page 64 and 65:
We will go back to our model of a s
Page 66 and 67:
The four fundamental states of matt
Page 68 and 69:
on how much of an ‘encouraging fo
Page 70 and 71:
Dark Mode: (Low Energy) • • •
Page 72 and 73:
If a hydrogen atom has its single e
Page 74 and 75:
63 | Some basic theory that will he
Page 76 and 77:
On the domestic scene, we often fin
Page 78 and 79:
We experience two types of magnetis
Page 80 and 81:
Getting back to electric currents a
Page 82 and 83:
Here, the often powerful radiation
Page 84 and 85:
This twisted form will come as no s
Page 86 and 87:
These are all examples that involve
Page 88 and 89:
• • • • • • • • Rad
Page 90 and 91:
Helium is a gas with 2 protons and
Page 92 and 93: 5 | The work of the honourable but
Page 94 and 95: Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790) was
Page 96 and 97: Birkeland’s name will be remember
Page 98 and 99: Here are some of Alfvén’s other
Page 100 and 101: Ralph E Juergens (1924 - 1979) [5-6
Page 102 and 103: This has been a look back into hist
Page 104 and 105: Donald E Scott. [5-11] is the third
Page 106 and 107: Many of these ‘star objects’ ap
Page 108 and 109: These variables are: regions of vas
Page 110 and 111: If a straight split of a star is ac
Page 112 and 113: There is one other item to highligh
Page 114 and 115: Producing planets and moons: I ment
Page 116 and 117: Here, it has been suggested that ju
Page 118 and 119: Given what has been said so far, go
Page 120 and 121: As development progressed in radio
Page 122 and 123: The way we do this today, however,
Page 124 and 125: Note that Nova is the name given to
Page 126 and 127: Is this a pipe-dream? I do not know
Page 128 and 129: Here is what this experiment infers
Page 130 and 131: This time, however, the types of ma
Page 132 and 133: Visually, it appears to us that bot
Page 134 and 135: that have no other significant valu
Page 136 and 137: In real life, a capacitor has two m
Page 138 and 139: The Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud
Page 140 and 141: As mentioned previously, comet Holm
Page 144 and 145: Astro-scientists interpret these pl
Page 146 and 147: Asteroids and comets are fundamenta
Page 148 and 149: When meteoroids become meteors as t
Page 150 and 151: Geology thoughts: I have looked clo
Page 152 and 153: Just before the copper projectile s
Page 154 and 155: It seems once again that what was k
Page 156 and 157: We can closely inspect many craters
Page 158 and 159: Consider the ‘doctored’ image o
Page 160 and 161: The central peaks often seen inside
Page 162 and 163: Vast areas of the hemispheres of pl
Page 164 and 165: How is it that the small bodies of
Page 166 and 167: Monument Valley Arizona - Source Wi
Page 168 and 169: The similarities between this chasm
Page 170 and 171: ‘As seen in numerous counterparts
Page 172 and 173: It may therefore be NASA and ESA th
Page 174 and 175: These gullies have an almost errati
Page 176 and 177: Flat Top Mesa It may just be me, bu
Page 178 and 179: In terms of the job I originally se
Page 180 and 181: Given that these electrical process
Page 182 and 183: We need to find the more worthy sci
Page 184 and 185: important reason behind me writing
Page 186 and 187: And finally ... Why should any of t
Page 188 and 189: [1-13] Wikipedia article - “Impac
Page 190 and 191: Chapter Five References: [5-1] Kris
Page 192 and 193:
[6-23] Wal Thornhill, “Mystery of
Page 194 and 195:
[6-5 ] TPOD - “Meteor Crater in A
show all

A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?