A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

There are many other visual observations and data records that contradict standard comet theory and which
seem to support the logic and experimental results behind the alternative electric theory. Why in 1991 was comet
Halley seen to ‘expel’ a cloud of glowing dust from its 15 kilometre nucleus, where this cloud then grew rapidly
to be 300,000 kilometres in diameter, even though Halley was 14 times the distance from the Sun than the Earth
is [6-47a] [6-47b] . What level of heat from the Sun could have been present to affect so significantly a piece of ice at
that far distance? In this case, and as previously with comet Holmes, the explanation is electrical. The double
layer surrounding the comet’s negatively charged nucleus simply interacted with a significant concentration of
positively charged plasma in the heliosphere (produced by a CME from the Sun perhaps) at that location.
Observations also indicate that some comets seem not to be very solid or that they are bodies with very little
mass. Astro-scientists have taken this apparent lightness (fluffiness, as they call it) as evidence that comets are
indeed snowball-like or that they may be internally ‘honeycombed’ in some way by empty tunnels and voids.
Bear in mind that these athletically creative views are offered confidently despite the great amounts of evidence
that contradict the standard model for comets. One wonders how this can be, especially where we have close-up
images of comet nuclei showing rugged, rocky, cratered, gouged and pitted surfaces that bear no resemblance
to ice in any of its forms in any way whatsoever. The apparent ‘lightness’ being detected can be accounted for
if we are willing to accept that gravity itself is fundamentally electrical and just another aspect of the EM force.
Quite a leap, I know, but there are good reasons to accept this as true.
The main piece of evidence here is that the weight (mass) of a negatively charged body located within the
positively charged environment of space, would in the view of some really clever people, measure differently
depending on the amount of negative charge it takes on. In terms of comets in space, this means that the highly
negatively charged nuclei of comets travelling within the highly positively charged environment around our Sun,
where the electrical difference between them would be very significant, would appear to us as if their weight
was akin to that of a lump of polystyrene foam! I personally find the thought of electrically modifiable gravity
fascinating, and if true, it could provide a route to consider explanations for other puzzles in astro-science and
from archaeology and geology that have traditionally had a relationship with gravity; significant puzzles that
have been around for a very long time. I underline, however, that this is my own thinking wandering off at a
tangent [6-48a] .
The craters and other sharply defined features that we see on the surfaces of comets can also be explained. Here
once again we must keep in mind the scale of electric currents that are potentially available to flow between the
plasma environment of space and the highly charged surfaces of comets. It may seem here tempting to imagine
powerful Birkeland currents cutting into and lifting material away from comet surfaces, and this is fine to have
as a mental image, for it is indeed what happens.
131 | The Electric Universe answers I see